Halo One™ Thin-Walled Guiding Sheath HLO57035Recalls & reported problems
Clearstream Technologies Limited · Halo One 5F guiding sheath diameter, 70 cm shaft length, including 035 Dilator with hydrophilic coating · Class 2
All models of Halo One Thin-Walled Guiding Sheath (27)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741161933), received between Oct 8, 2020 and Sep 2, 2025 — classified as 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material3
- Device-Device Incompatibility1
- Failure to Advance1
- Material Deformation1
- Retraction Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 2, 2025Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE OF A 5CM CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION IN THE RIGHT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY VIA TAI APPROACH, I WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE WAS ALLEGEDLY WETTED WITH SALINE AND WIPED WITH WET GAUZE, SMALL WHITE LUMPS WERE FOUND ADHERING TO THE SHEATH SURFACE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22932079 ↗MalfunctionSep 2, 2025Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE OF A 5CM CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION IN THE RIGHT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY VIA TAI APPROACH. IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE, THE SURFACE OF THE SHEATH FELT ROUGH WHEN THE DEVICE WAS OPENED. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE WAS ALLEGEDLY WETTED WITH SALINE AND LIGHTLY WIPED WITH WET GAUZE, REVEALING SMALL WHITE LUMPS ADHERING TO THE SHEATH SURFACE IN SEVERAL PLACES. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22931715 ↗MalfunctionMar 4, 2022Failure to Advance; Material Deformation; Failure to Advance; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A RECANALIZATION PROCEDURE OF THE COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY TO ACCESS THE SPLENIC ARTERY ANEURYSM, RESISTANCE WAS ALLEGEDLY FELT WHEN ADVANCING THE DEVICE. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED OFF THE PATIENT AND UPON EXAMINATION, THE DILATOR TIP OF THE DEVICE WAS ALLEGEDLY NOTED TO BE DAMAGED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13665342 ↗MalfunctionNov 7, 2021Retraction Problem; Device-Device Incompatibility; Retraction Problem; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT POST AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE THROUGH PUNCTURE IN THE ARTERIAL BRACHIALIS, THE CATHETER SHAFT WAS ALLEGEDLY UNABLE TO BE REMOVED THROUGH THE DEVICE. THE HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL HAD TO REMOVE EVERYTHING TOGETHER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12757272 ↗MalfunctionOct 8, 2020Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE THE GUIDEWIRE WAS BEING LOADED ON TO THE GUIDING SHEATH, THE GUIDING SHEATH WAS FOUND ALLEGEDLY CONTAMINATED WITH A MILKY SUBSTANCE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10653385 ↗
Other INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices
- VIZIGO D138502Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER2 recalls4 deaths2,839 reports
- VIZIGO D138501Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER2 recalls2 deaths2,005 reports
- Swartz™ 407451St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER5 deaths728 reports
- Edwards eSheath+ Introducer set 914ESPEdwards Lifesciences LLC · Introducer, Catheter22 deaths532 reports
- Fast-Cath™ 406849St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER420 reports
- VIZIGO D138503Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER362 reports
- Agilis™ G408318St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER333 reports
- Agilis™ NxT Steerable Introducer Dual-Reach™ SI-1371-MSt. Jude Medical, Inc. · Introducer, catheter1 death301 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page