8.7 mm X 160 mm iFuse TORQ TNT Implant 870160Recalls & reported problems
Si-Bone Inc. · 8.7 mm X 160 mm iFuse TORQ TNT Implant · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00810055524402), received between Jun 13, 2025 and Jun 13, 2025 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Loss of Osseointegration1
Patient problems
- Inadequate Osseointegration1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 13, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
THE PATIENT IS A WOMAN OF APPROXIMATELY 70 YEARS. SHE HAD A FALL AT HOME WITH A U-TYPE SACRAL FRACTURE AND RIGHT PUBIC RAMUS FRACTURE. THE SURGEON PLACED ONE SI-BONE TORQ TNT TRANSILIAC TRANSSACRAL SCREW AND ONE STANDARD TRANSILIAC TRANSSACRAL SCREW IN THE S1 CORRIDOR. IFUSE TORQ TNT WAS PLACED IN/NEAR THE TRANSVERSE FRACTURE LINE OF THE SACRAL U TYPE FRACTURE. IFUSE TORQ TNT WAS REPORTED TO HAVE GOOD DISTAL ILIUM PURCHASE, AND THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT ANY PROBLEMS. ADDITIONALLY, A NON-SI-BONE SCREW WAS PLACED IN THE PUBIC RAMUS. THE PATIENT HAD BACK PAIN AFTER SURGERY. MRI SHOWED MULTIPLE DISC PROBLEMS AT L3-L4, L4-L5, AND L5-S1. AT ABOUT TWO WEEKS AFTER THE INITIAL PELVIC SURGERY, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT LAMINECTOMY/DISCECTOMY. THE PATIENT FELL AT AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY POSTOPERATIVELY. CT SCAN SHOWED IFUSE TORQ TNT BACKOUT. THE PATIENT WAS MEDICALLY COMPLICATED, WITH SEPSIS FROM UTI, AS WELL AS WOUND DEHISCENCE IN LUMBAR SPINE WOUND. THE PATIENT WAS NOTED TO BE MOVING AROUND A LOT IN BED POSTOPERATIVELY. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT LUMBOPELVIC SPINE FIXATION SURGERY, IN WHICH THE IFUSE TORQ TNT WAS REMOVED AND PELVIC FIXATION SCREWS WERE PLACED. THE SURGEON DID NOT KNOW THE C
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 22205209 ↗
Other Screw, Fixation, Bone devices
- NA 03.043.029Synthes GmbH · Screw, fixation, bone503 reports
- OSTEORAPTOR 72201995Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Screw, fixation, bone253 reports
- Control 360 SK12Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. · Screw, Fixation, Bone195 reports
- HEALIX PEEK ORTHOCORD 222205Medos International Sàrl · Screw, fixation, bone186 reports
- PRECICE® Bone Transport System STP3.5-400Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Screw, Fixation, Bone3 recalls0 reports
- PRECICE® Bone Transport System STP3.5-225Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Screw, Fixation, Bone3 recalls0 reports
- PRECICE® Bone Transport System STP3.5-350Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Screw, Fixation, Bone3 recalls0 reports
- PRECICE® Bone Transport System STP3.5-300Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Screw, Fixation, Bone3 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page