Azur Detachable Helical HydroCoil 45-451020Recalls & reported problems
Microvention, Inc. · Azur · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Azur Detachable Helical HydroCoil (42)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00810170014970), received between Jun 12, 2018 and Apr 11, 2022 — classified as 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component3
- Device-Device Incompatibility2
- Detachment Of Device Component1
- Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 11, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device-Device Incompatibility; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN EMBOLIZATION TREATMENT OF A RENAL ANEURYSM, THE COIL ADVANCED INTO THE CATHETER WITHOUT INCIDENT. RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED AS THE COIL WAS ADVANCED INTO THE COIL MASS. THE COIL WAS WITHDRAWN AND ATTEMPTED TO REPOSITION THE CATHETER. THE COIL WAS RE-ADVANCED HOWEVER, RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING MANIPULATION, THE COIL DETACHED FROM THE DELIVERY PUSHER. ADDITIONAL COILS WERE DELIVERED WITHOUT INCIDENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPETED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14079851 ↗MalfunctionAug 18, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device-Device Incompatibility; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER THE IMPLANT COIL PARTLY EMERGED FROM THE CATHETER, THE COIL STOPPED ADVANCING. DURING THE ATTEMPT TO REMOVE THE DEVICE, THE COIL DETACHED FROM THE PUSHER WIRE. A .035 GUIDE WIRE WAS USED TO PUSH THE IMPLANT COIL INTO THE TREATMENT SITE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY OR ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION. THE PATIENT'S CURRENT CONDITION IS REPORTED TO BE "STABLE/UNREMARKABLE."
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10423558 ↗MalfunctionMar 14, 2020Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT COIL EMBOLIZATION WAS PERFORMED IN AN INTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY. DURING DELIVERY OF THE 8TH COIL, THE FIRST 2-3 LOOPS FORMED WITHOUT ISSUE, BUT ADVANCING THE COIL BECAME MORE DIFFICULT. THE CATHETER WAS MANIPULATED AND THE COIL WAS RE-ADVANCED SEVERAL TIMES OVER THE SPAN OF APPROXIMATELY 4.5 MINUTES UNTIL THE COIL WOULD NO LONGER ADVANCE. DURING THE WITHDRAWAL ATTEMPT, THE COIL DETACHED IN THE CATHETER. BOTH SEGMENTS OF THE COIL WERE REMOVED TOGETHER WITH THE CATHETER WITHOUT INCIDENT. THE SAME CATHETER WAS REINSERTED AND USED TO SUCCESSFULLY DEPLOY 3 MORE COILS TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9832967 ↗MalfunctionJun 12, 2018Detachment Of Device Component; Detachment Of Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING POSITIONING OF AN EMBOLIZATION COIL IN A PSEUDO ANEURYSM, THE COIL DETACHED IN THE CATHETER. THE COIL WAS REMOVED IN ITS ENTIRETY ALONG WITH THE CATHETER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED INTERVENTION OR PATIENT INJURY. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7594608 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page