Azur Detachable Helical HydroCoil 45-451220Recalls & reported problems
Microvention, Inc. · Azur · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Azur Detachable Helical HydroCoil (42)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00810170014994), received between Oct 21, 2016 and Nov 30, 2023 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment Of Device Component” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment Of Device Component1
- Premature Separation1
- Separation Failure1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionNov 30, 2023Premature Separation; Premature Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN THE DOCTOR DEPLOYED THE COIL DURING A PAVM EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE, IT DID NOT WORK. THE COIL WAS ADVANCED THROUGH A MICROCATHETER, AND IT UNINTENTIONALLY DETACHED INSIDE THE MICROCATHETER. NO DETACHMENT CONTROLLER WAS USED. A FLUOROSCOPY SHOWED THAT THE COIL WAS DETACHED INSIDE THE MICROCATHETER. BOTH THE COIL AND MICROCATHETER WERE REMOVED TOGETHER FROM THE PATIENT. NO PATIENT INJURY OR INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED. THE PATIENT WAS NOT HARMED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18243786 ↗MalfunctionOct 21, 2016Detachment Of Device Component; Separation Failure; Detachment Of Device Component; Separation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE AZUR EMBOLIZATION COIL WOULD NOT DETACH. DURING THE ATTEMPT TO REPOSITION THE COIL, IT DETACHED IN THE MICROCATHETER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY OR ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION. THE PROCEDURE CONTINUED AND WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6049509 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page