Skip to content

Azur Detachable Helical HydroCoil 45-480405Recalls & reported problems

Microvention, Inc. · Azur · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Azur Detachable Helical HydroCoil (42)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00810170017896), received between Oct 18, 2018 and Mar 28, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Detachment of Device or Device Component3
  • Premature Separation2

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 28, 2025Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    AS REPORTED IN AN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, AN AZUR COIL WAS USED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE COIL DETACHED SPONTANEOUSLY FROM ITS DELIVERY CATHETER INTO THE MICROCATHETER, WITHOUT MANIPULATION ERROR. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED, AND A SECOND COIL WAS USED. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES FOR THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21724168 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 30, 2022Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING TREATMENT OF A PSEUDO ANEURYSM, AN EMBOLIZATION IMPLANT COIL DETACHED UNEXPECTEDLY DURING RETRACTION; THE PHYSICIAN WAS INITIALLY NOT SATISFIED WITH THE ORIGINAL POSITIONING. THE SYSTEM WAS REMOVED AND THE CASE COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY OR INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13956280 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 15, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PERIPHERAL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE, THE EMBOLIZATION COIL UNEXPECTEDLY DETACHED FROM ITS DELIVERY SYSTEM PRIOR TO DEPLOYMENT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY OR ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 10687881 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 24, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE EMBOLIZATION COIL DETACHED UNEXPECTEDLY IN THE MICROCATHETER DURING POSITIONING. THE IMPLANT COIL WAS PLACED IN THE INTENDED TREATMENT LOCATION. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY OR ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10320449 ↗
  • InjuryOct 18, 2018Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING ADVANCEMENT OF THE EMBOLIZATION COIL IN THE MICROCATHETER, THE COIL DETACHED WITHOUT USE OF THE CONTROLLER. TWO (2) ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO REMOVE THE COIL; HOWEVER, THEY WERE UNSUCCESSFUL. THE COIL WAS LEFT IMPLANTED IN THE HEPATIC ARTERY. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY AS A RESULT OF THE ISSUE. THE PATIENT IS REPORTED TO BE FEELING GOOD.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7979373 ↗

Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices

All Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page