Azur Detachable Helical HydroCoil 45-481015Recalls & reported problems
Microvention, Inc. · Azur · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Azur Detachable Helical HydroCoil (42)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00810170018008), received between Dec 23, 2016 and Feb 23, 2022 — classified as 3 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Migration2
- Detachment Of Device Component1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Unraveled Material1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryFeb 23, 2022Unraveled Material; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Unraveled Material; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING EMBOLIZATION TREATMENT OF A LEFT HEPATIC ARTERY ANEURYSM, THE COIL WAS RETRACTED AND POSITIONED WITHOUT ENCOUNTERED RESISTANCE. THE COIL WAS REPORT TO HAVE DETACHED FROM THE DELIVERY PUSHER. ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO RETRACT AND ADVANCE THE COIL UNSUCCESSFULLY. THE MAJORITY OF THE COIL REMAINED WITHIN THE MICROCATHETER WHICH WAS STILL POSITIONED WITHIN THE COMMON HEPATIC ARTERY AND CELIAC TRUNK. THE COIL WAS SNARED WITHIN THE 5FR BASE CATHETER VIA THE MICRO CATHETER. THE PROXIMAL PORTION OF THE COIL WAS SUCCESSFULLY SNARED, HOWEVER ONLY A SMALL PORTION OF THE COIL WAS RETRIEVED ON RETRACTION. THE MAIN PORTION OF THE COIL WAS DEPLOYED WITHIN THE DISTAL COMMON HEPATIC ARTERY AND PROXIMAL COMMON HEPATIC ARTERY BY INJECTION OF SALINE VIA THE BASE CATHETER. AS THIS WAS NON-OCCLUSIVE, THE COIL WAS LEFT IN SITU. ON REMOVAL OF THE BASE CATHETER IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE REMAINED A LONG ATTACHED, UNRAVELED PORTION OF COIL EXTENDING BACK TO THE CELIAC AXIS, AORTA AND RIGHT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY. PATIENT IS NOT SHOWING SYMPTOMS FROM THE MAL-POSITIONED COIL AT THIS TIME. NO PATIENT HARM OR INJURY WAS REPORTED. NO FURTHER TREATMENT IS PLANNED TO ADDRESS THE UNRAVELED PORT
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13586635 ↗InjurySep 27, 2018Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT NINE (9) COILS WERE IMPLANTED IN AN ARTERIOVENOUS (AV) FISTULA OFF THE RIGHT ILIAC ARTERY IN (B)(6) 2018. APPROXIMATELY THREE (3) MONTHS LATER IN (B)(6) THE PATIENT HAD SYMPTOMATIC COMPLAINTS IN HER PELVIS AGAIN. ANGIOGRAPHIC EXAMINATION REVEALED THE COIL PACK WAS NO LONGER IN THE AREA OF THE AV FISTULA, AND HAD MIGRATED TO THE PATIENT'S LUNG. ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO RETRIEVE THE COIL PACK OVER A PERIOD OF 1.5 HOURS; HOWEVER, THEY WERE UNSUCCESSFUL. THE PATIENT HAS HAD NO SYMPTOMS OF COMPLICATIONS IN THE RESPIRATORY SYSTEM. THE PATIENT HAS BEEN REFERRED TO A CT SURGEON. THE PATIENT IS CURRENTLY REPORTED TO BE STABLE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7916754 ↗InjurySep 27, 2018Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT NINE (9) COILS WERE IMPLANTED IN AN ARTERIOVENOUS (AV) FISTULA OFF THE RIGHT ILIAC ARTERY IN (B)(6) 2018. APPROXIMATELY THREE (3) MONTHS LATER IN (B)(6) THE PATIENT HAD SYMPTOMATIC COMPLAINTS IN HER PELVIS AGAIN. ANGIOGRAPHIC EXAMINATION REVEALED THE COIL PACK WAS NO LONGER IN THE AREA OF THE AV FISTULA, AND HAD MIGRATED TO THE PATIENT'S LUNG. ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO RETRIEVE THE COIL PACK OVER A PERIOD OF 1.5 HOURS; HOWEVER, THEY WERE UNSUCCESSFUL. THE PATIENT HAS HAD NO SYMPTOMS OF COMPLICATIONS IN THE RESPIRATORY SYSTEM. THE PATIENT HAS BEEN REFERRED TO A CT SURGEON. THE PATIENT IS CURRENTLY REPORTED TO BE STABLE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7916752 ↗MalfunctionDec 23, 2016Detachment Of Device Component; Detachment Of Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED A COIL WAS DEPLOYED BUT WOULD NOT TAKE CORRECT SHAPE OR DESIRED POSITION. AFTER MULTIPLE MANIPULATION ATTEMPTS, THE COIL SEPARATED FROM PUSHER WIRE INSIDE THE MICROCATHETER. BOTH COIL AND MICROCATHETER WAS SAFELY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED WITH THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6203399 ↗
Other Device, Neurovascular Embolization devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page