PRECICE® Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System P12.5-80B275Recalls & reported problems
Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Orthopedic intramedullary limb lengthening rod, antegrade femur (piriformis), 12.5 mm diameter, 275 mm length · Class 2 · Implant
All models of PRECICE Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System (551)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
2 open recalls name this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 2
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00812258020330), received between Jan 27, 2022 and Dec 16, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).
2 FDA recall records name this device's identifier, 2 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Oct 29, 2021Class IIOpen, Classified
The Instructions for Use have been updated to include: (1) Clarification that the device is intended for use only in patients 18 years and older, (2) That patients should weigh 50 lbs. or more while undergoing treatment, and (3) That no more than two devices should be implanted at a time.
Z-0319-2022 · Root cause: Device Design · Recall details · FDA record ↗
- Feb 12, 2021Class IIOpen, Classified
Due to not having the full complement of biological assessments for all potential patients and as a result the devices are not indicated for use in individuals under the age of 18 years old.
Z-1349-2021 · Root cause: Device Design · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break2
- Failure to Advance1
- Fracture1
- Mechanical Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Failure of Implant1
- Implant Pain1
- Insufficient Information1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 16, 2025Break; Fracture; Break; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT PRECICE HARDWARE EXCHANGE DUE TO A BROKEN NAIL. THE PATIENT REQUIRED AN OSTEOTOMY TO FIX THE MALROTATION OF FEMUR.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23818463 ↗InjuryDec 3, 2024Break; Break
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT BILATERAL FEMUR LENGTHENING ON (B)(6) 2024. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT REPORTED EXPERIENCING A ¿POPPING¿ SENSATION IN THE RIGHT FEMUR DURING ROUTINE PHYSICAL THERAPY. WHILE THE EXACT DATE OF OCCURRENCE IS UNCLEAR, IT IS ESTIMATED TO HAVE TAKEN PLACE WITHIN 7 TO 10 DAYS PRIOR TO (B)(6) 2024. UPON FURTHER EVALUATION USING RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGING, A FRACTURE OF THE FEMORAL NAIL WAS IDENTIFIED. THE PATIENT DENIED ANY HISTORY OF TORSIONAL FORCES OR EXCEEDING PRESCRIBED WEIGHT-BEARING LIMITATIONS. THE REPORTED ¿POPPING¿ WAS ACCOMPANIED BY PAIN AND ROTATIONAL INSTABILITY. ON (B)(6) 2024, THE FRACTURED NAIL WAS SUCCESSFULLY REPLACED, AND THE PATIENT IS NOW SET TO RESUME POST-OPERATIVE LENGTHENING.
Patient problems: Implant Pain
MAUDE report 20833101 ↗MalfunctionJan 24, 2023Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT WHILE TESTING DURING IMPLANTATION THE NAIL FAILED TO DISTRACT AFTER MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS TO LENGTHEN INTRA-OPERATIVELY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A NEW NAIL. THE NAIL WAS EXAMINED AFTER THE PROCEDURE AND THE MALE/FEMALE JUNCTION WAS REPORTEDLY NEVER SECURELY FASTENED TOGETHER ALLOWING THE NAIL TO BE PULLED APART WITH LITTLE TO NO EFFORT.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 16234734 ↗MalfunctionJan 27, 2022Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING INTEROPERATIVE TESTING PERFORMED AFTER THE NAIL WAS IMPLANTED, THE NAIL FAILED TO LENGTHEN. THE NAIL WAS EXCHANGED WITH ANOTHER NAIL, WHICH LENGTHENED SUCCESSFULLY DURING TESTING. NO PATIENT HARM OR IMPACT WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13367662 ↗
Other Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories devices
- NA 03.033.001Synthes GmbH · ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES265 reports
- GAMMA 3125-1180SStryker GmbH · ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES249 reports
- NA 03.037.026Synthes GmbH · ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES225 reports
- PRECICE® Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System LSC5-075Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories4 recalls2 reports
- PRECICE® Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System LSC5-045Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories4 recalls1 report
- PRECICE® Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System LSC5-050Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories4 recalls1 report
- TRIGEN 71674067Smith & Nephew, Inc. · ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES201 reports
- PRECICE Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System LSB5-040Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories4 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page