Skip to content

PRECICE® Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System P8.5-50D215Recalls & reported problems

Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Orthopedic intramedullary limb lengthening rod, antegrade femur (Trochanteric), 8.5 mm diameter, 215 mm length · Class 2 · Implant

All models of PRECICE Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System (551)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

2 open recalls name this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
2

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00812258020583), received between Apr 15, 2020 and Nov 10, 2023 — classified as 1 injury, 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

2 FDA recall records name this device's identifier, 2 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Oct 29, 2021Class IIOpen, Classified

    The Instructions for Use have been updated to include: (1) Clarification that the device is intended for use only in patients 18 years and older, (2) That patients should weigh 50 lbs. or more while undergoing treatment, and (3) That no more than two devices should be implanted at a time.

    Z-0319-2022 · Root cause: Device Design · Recall details · FDA record ↗

  2. Feb 12, 2021Class IIOpen, Classified

    Due to not having the full complement of biological assessments for all potential patients and as a result the devices are not indicated for use in individuals under the age of 18 years old.

    Z-1349-2021 · Root cause: Device Design · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Mechanical Problem1
  • Migration1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant5
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 10, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT DURING EXPLANTATION, THE NAIL SEPARATED AND THE DISTAL PORTION WAS INITIALLY LEFT IN THE PATIENT'S BONE AS THE BONE CORTEX APPEARED TO HAVE CHANGED, WHICH RESULTED IN A REDUCED INTRAMEDULLARY CANAL SIZE. THE DISTAL PORTION WAS SUBSEQUENTLY RETRIEVED ANTEGRADE; HOWEVER, IT TOOK APPROXIMATELY 45 MINUTES TO RETRIEVE THE DISTAL PORTION. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT INJURY OR FURTHER PROCEDURE IMPACT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 18112539 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 24, 2023Migration; Migration

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT THERE WAS DISLOCATION OF THE NAIL. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 16800977 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 31, 2023Break; Break

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT DURING A PLANNED REMOVAL PROCEDURE THE NAIL WAS FOUND TO BE CRACKED IN THE DISTAL ASPECT OF THE OUTER HOUSING. THE CRACK ON THE NAIL WAS NOTED TO EXTEND PROXIMAL ANOTHER 2-4CM. THE PATIENT REPORTED NO FALLS, IMPACTS, PAIN, OR OTHER NOTABLE EVENTS THAT WOULD CONTRIBUTE TO THE BREAKAGE. A PIECE OF THE HOUSING WAS MISSING FROM THE NAIL AND WAS LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT'S MEDULLARY CANAL. THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO RETRIEVE THE REMAINING METAL PIECE IN THE MEDULLARY CANAL, BUT DECIDED TO PROCEED WITH INSERTING THE NEW TRAUMA NAIL WITHOUT SUCCESSFULLY REMOVING THE BROKEN PIECE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 16273137 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 29, 2022Break; Break

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT THE NAIL LENGTHENED ABOUT 3.5CM BEFORE IT WAS FOUND TO BE BENT. ALTHOUGH THE NAIL WAS FOUND TO BE BENT, THE PATIENT COMPLETED EXTENSION. HOWEVER, THE PATIENT IS NOW EXPERIENCING PAIN AS THE NAIL IS BROKEN AFTER THE PATIENT JUMPED INTO WATER. THE NAIL WAS EXPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain

    MAUDE report 15129605 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 18, 2022Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT THE PATIENT PREMATURELY CONSOLIDATED AND ANOTHER OSTEOTOMY WAS PERFORMED. THE NAIL WAS REPORTED TO HAVE FAILED TO DISTRACT INTRA-OPERATIVELY. NO PATIENT ADVERSE EVENT WAS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14137645 ↗
  • InjuryApr 15, 2020Break; Break

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT A REVISION PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2020. AS PER THE REPORTER, THE NAIL WAS BROKEN. REPORTEDLY, THE PATIENT WAS FULL WEIGHT BEARING BEYOND INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 9965487 ↗

Other Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories devices

All Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page