Skip to content

SafeGuide® 1214-02DRecalls & reported problems

Diversatek Healthcare, Inc. · Guidewire with Spring Tip - Single Use · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00816734021507), received between Nov 30, 2021 and Sep 30, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Remove” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult to Remove2
  • Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem1
  • Device Damaged by Another Device1
  • Difficult to Insert1
  • Mechanical Problem1

Patient problems

  • Laceration(s) of Esophagus2
  • Perforation of Esophagus2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 30, 2024Mechanical Problem; Difficult to Remove; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Mechanical Problem; Difficult to Remove; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem

    CUSTOMER REPORTED EVENT TO MANUFACTURER ON SEPTEMBER 04, 2024. CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE SPRING TIP OF THE GUIDEWIRE BENT IN SUCH A WAY AFTER DILATION THAT IT LED TO THE PERFORATION OF THE PATIENT'S ESOPHAGUS. THE BEND TO THE SPRING TIP FORMED A V-SHAPE. THE ACUTE BEND OF THE WIRE DUG INTO THE PATIENTS ESOPHAGUS UPON REMOVAL OF THE WIRE. THE ESOPHAGUS WAS PERFORATED AS A RESULT OF REMOVAL WITH THE EXTREME BEND TO THE TIP. SURGICAL INTERVENTION WAS NEEDED TO REPAIR THE PERFORATION. THE PATIENT WAS HOSPITALIZED FOR AN UNDISCLOSED AMOUNT OF TIME.

    Patient problems: Laceration(s) of Esophagus; Perforation of Esophagus

    MAUDE report 20333114 ↗
  • InjuryNov 30, 2021Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Remove; Device Damaged by Another Device; Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Remove; Device Damaged by Another Device

    CUSTOMER REPORTED EVENT TO MANUFACTURER ON NOVEMBER 1, 2021. CUSTOMER REPORTED THE GUIDEWIRE BENT WHICH LED TO THE PERFORATION OF THE PATIENT'S ESOPHAGUS. THE GUIDEWIRE FORMED A V-SHAPE. THE ACUTE BEND OF THE WIRED WAS LODGED IN THE WALL OF THE ESOPHAGUS. THE ESOPHAGUS TORE UPON REMOVAL OF THE WIRE. SURGICAL INTERVENTION WAS NEEDED TO REPAIR THE PERFORATION AND PLACE AN ESOPHAGEAL STENT WITH BILATERAL CHEST DRAINAGE TUBES. THE PATIENT WAS HOSPITALIZED FOR 6 DAYS FOLLOWING THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: Laceration(s) of Esophagus; Perforation of Esophagus

    MAUDE report 12903472 ↗

Other Dilator, Esophageal devices

All Dilator, Esophageal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page