Skip to content

Cannulated Compression Headless Screw 03.333.101Recalls & reported problems

Tyber Medical, LLC · 2.0MM CANN DRILL BIT QC/ 145MM · Class 1

All models of Cannulated Compression Headless Screw (21)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00819917026566), received between Aug 14, 2025 and Aug 14, 2025 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 14, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2025 WHILE DRILLING THROUGH THE 1ST MET, RESIDENT DOCTOR MENTIONED THAT THERE WASN'T FEELING LIKE THERE WAS MUCH POWER OR ANY ADVANCEMENTS WITH THE DRILL BIT. THE SURGEON ASSUMED IT WAS DUE TO THE NATURE OF THE PATIENT'S HARDER THAN AVERAGE BONE AS THE SURGEON HAD ALREADY GONE THROUGH 3 SAW BLADES PRIOR TO THIS INCIDENT. UPON PULLING THE DRILL BIT OUT OF THE TISSUE SLEEVE, THE RESIDENT NOTICED THE DRILL BIT HAD SNAPPED. UPON FLUORO, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE TIP OF THE DRILL BIT HAD SNAPPED INTO ONE LARGE PIECE, AND 2 SMALLER PIECES WHILE ALSO DAMAGING THE DRILL SLEEVE WHEN PULLING OUT. THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO REMOVE THE LARGE PIECE OF THE DRILL BIT BUT WAS UNABLE TO RECOVER THE 2 SMALLER FRAGMENTS THAT WERE STUCK WITHIN THE BONE/OSTEOTOMY SITE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22811861 ↗

Other ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices

All ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page