Skip to content

Check-Flo G07417Recalls & reported problems

Cook Incorporated · Check-Flo Introducer Set · Class 2

All models of Check-Flo (19)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002074170), received between Dec 5, 2017 and Dec 11, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Crack” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Crack1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping1
  • Device Damaged Prior to Use1
  • Material Separation1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1
  • Unraveled Material1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 11, 2025Crack; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Crack; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED 03MAR2026. THE DEVICE WAS USED AS A TROCAR THROUGH THE UTERINE WALL, THROUGH WHICH NEONATAL AND PREMATURE LAPAROSCOPY INSTRUMENTS ARE HANDLED. THERE WERE NO ISSUES ENCOUNTERED DURING SHEATH INSERTION; HOWEVER, INSTRUMENTS WERE DIFFICULT TO MOBILIZE IN THE ¿DUCT¿, AND THE DEVICE WAS ¿TOO STRONG¿ TO MOBILIZE INSTRUMENTS CORRECTLY. A ¿NSP¿ WIRE WAS USED DURING THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23777997 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 9, 2024Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping; Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping

    AS REPORTED, DURING INSPECTION UPON ARRIVAL WITHIN A DISTRIBUTION FACILITY, FOREIGN MATTER WAS FOUND INSIDE A PERFORMER INTRODUCER'S STERILE PACKAGE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20877470 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 9, 2024Unraveled Material; Device Damaged Prior to Use; Material Twisted/Bent; Unraveled Material; Device Damaged Prior to Use; Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS ORIGINALLY REPORTED THAT DURING AN UNSPECIFIED PROCEDURE, SHEATH PUNCTURE WITH THE PERFORMER INTRODUCER SET WAS USED TO ESTABLISH VENOUS ACCESS. AFTER OPENING, THE USER FOUND THAT THE WIRE GUIDE WAS KINKED AND COULD NOT BE USED. THE DEVICE DID NOT COME INTO CONTACT WITH THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS OR REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. UPON INITIAL EVALUATION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE ON (B)(6) 2024, THE WIRE GUIDE COILS WERE FOUND TO BE ELONGATED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19074697 ↗
  • InjuryDec 5, 2017Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PULMONARY VALVULOPLASTY, APPROXIMATELY THREE (3) CENTIMETERS OF THE PERFORMER INTRODUCER BROKE AND SEPARATED FROM THE SHEATH INSIDE OF THE PATIENT. THE SHEATH WAS PLACED IN THE PATIENT'S RIGHT FEMORAL ARTERY THROUGH THE GROIN; ANOTHER MANUFACTURER'S BALLOON WAS BEING UTILIZED THROUGH THE SHEATH DURING THE EVENT. THE SEPARATED PIECE WAS NOT RETRIEVED DURING THE EVENT. FURTHER INFORMATION REGARDING DEVICE RETRIEVAL STATUS WILL BE PROVIDED UPON RECEIPT OF THIS INFORMATION. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT HAS NOT EXPERIENCED ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque

    MAUDE report 7083409 ↗

Other INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices

All INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page