Flexor G08246Recalls & reported problems
Cook Incorporated · Flexor, Check-Flo, Introducer Set · Class 2
All models of Flexor (134)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002082465), received between Aug 11, 2020 and Dec 12, 2023 — classified as 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component2
- Fluid/Blood Leak1
- Material Deformation1
- Material Separation1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 12, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
AS REPORTED, DURING AN UNSPECIFIED PROCEDURE, THE HUB SEPARATED ON A FLEXOR INTRODUCER SHEATH. NEAR THE END OF THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN WITHDREW THE SHEATH BY THE HUB AND THE HUB CAME OFF, CAUSING BLEEDING OUT THE PROXIMAL END. THE DILATOR WAS NOT REINSERTED PRIOR TO REMOVAL. THE SHEATH WAS REMOVED AND THE PROCEDURE COMPLETED. THE PATIENT IS REPORTEDLY DOING "FINE". A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES OR EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18313096 ↗InjuryAug 23, 2021Material Deformation; Material Deformation
AS REPORTED, A FLEXOR INTRODUCER SHEATH WAS USED DURING A PROCEDURE INVOLVING PLACEMENT OF BILATERAL ILIAC STENTS AND SHOCKWAVE BALLOONING FOR BILATERAL ILIAC OCCLUSION. ACCESS WAS OBTAINED IN THE RIGHT COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY, AND THE ANATOMY WAS CALCIFIED. ANOTHER MANUFACTURER'S SHOCKWAVE BALLOON WAS ADVANCED THROUGH THE COOK SHEATH OVER AN UNSPECIFIED WIRE GUIDE. AFTER INFLATION AND DEFLATION OF THE BALLOON, IT WAS REMOVED THROUGH THE SHEATH; HOWEVER, THE BALLOON WAS NOTED TO HAVE SEPARATED FROM THE SHOCKWAVE CATHETER. THE SHEATH WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT WITHOUT THE DILATOR. AFTER REMOVAL, THE END OF THE SHEATH WAS DESCRIBED AS FLARED AND ROUGH. THE PATIENT WAS TAKEN TO SURGERY FOR REMOVAL OF THE OTHER MANUFACTURER'S BALLOON FRAGMENTS. THE COOK SHEATH DID NOT SEPARATE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 12352890 ↗MalfunctionMay 4, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
NO NEW PATIENT OR EVENT INFORMATION TO REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11768507 ↗MalfunctionAug 25, 2020Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED, DURING AN UNSPECIFIED PROCEDURE, THE FLEXOR INTRODUCER SHEATH & FLEXOR ANSEL GUIDING SHEATH WERE UTILIZED WITH COMPLICATIONS. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, BOTH DEVICES WERE USED AT THE SAME ACCESS SITE, WHICH WAS NOTED TO HAVE HEAVY CALCIFICATION. WHILE ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE THE OTHER MANUFACTURER'S DEVICE, THE HUB OF ONE OF THE COOK SHEATH'S SEPARATED. DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE, THE OTHER COOK SHEATH UNCOILED; HOWEVER, THE ATTENDING NURSE WAS UNABLE TO IDENTIFIED AT WHAT POINT DURING THE PROCEDURE THIS OCCURRED. ADDITIONALLY, THE INITIAL REPORTER COULD NOT CONFIRM WHAT SHEATH EXHIBITED WHICH FAILURE. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING EVENT DETAILS, PATIENT ANATOMY AND OUTCOME HAS BEEN REQUESTED, BUT IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10450122 ↗MalfunctionAug 11, 2020Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak
NO NEW PATIENT OR EVENT INFORMATION TO REPORT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10390950 ↗
Other INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices
- VIZIGO D138502Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER2 recalls4 deaths2,839 reports
- VIZIGO D138501Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER2 recalls2 deaths2,005 reports
- Swartz™ 407451St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER5 deaths728 reports
- Edwards eSheath+ Introducer set 914ESPEdwards Lifesciences LLC · Introducer, Catheter22 deaths532 reports
- Fast-Cath™ 406849St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER420 reports
- VIZIGO D138503Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER362 reports
- Agilis™ G408318St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER333 reports
- Agilis™ NxT Steerable Introducer Dual-Reach™ SI-1371-MSt. Jude Medical, Inc. · Introducer, catheter1 death301 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page