Skip to content

Flexor G09602Recalls & reported problems

Cook Incorporated · Flexor, Check-Flo, Introducer Set · Class 2

All models of Flexor (134)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002096028), received between Jul 23, 2018 and Aug 27, 2025 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Detachment of Device or Device Component3

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 27, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    AS REPORTED, DURING AN UNSPECIFIED AORTIC INTERVENTION CASE, THE HUB OF A FLEXOR INTRODUCER SHEATH SEPARATED FROM THE DEVICE. THE ANATOMY WAS REPORTEDLY TORTUOUS. ALTHOUGH THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE FLEXOR HUB SEPARATED UPON REMOVAL OF THE DEVICE FROM ANOTHER MANUFACTURER¿S SHEATH, THE CUSTOMER ALSO REPORTED THAT THE OTHER MANUFACTURER¿S SHEATH WAS USED THROUGH THE FLEXOR SHEATH. PER THE REPORTER, THE DILATOR WAS REINSERTED PRIOR TO SHEATH REMOVAL OVER AN UNSPECIFIED WIRE GUIDE. A NEW FLEXOR SHEATH WAS USED TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES OR EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22905266 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 2, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    NO NEW PATIENT OR EVENT INFORMATION TO REPORT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10936482 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 23, 2018Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED, THE HEMOSTATIC VALVE ON THE FLEXOR INTRODUCER SHEATH DISCONNECTED COMPLETELY WHILE THE DEVICE WAS BEING FLUSHED, PRIOR TO USE. ANOTHER FLEXOR INTRODUCER SHEATH WAS SUCCESSFULLY PREPARED AND USED TO COMPLETE THE UNSPECIFIED PROCEDURE. THE DEVICE NEVER MADE CONTACT WITH THE PATIENT. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER THE PROCEDURE "WENT VERY WELL" AND THE "PATIENT IS FINE".

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7711350 ↗

Other INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices

All INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page