Skip to content

Flexor G10406Recalls & reported problems

Cook Incorporated · Flexor, Check-Flo, Introducer Balkin Up & Over, Contralateral Design · Class 2

All models of Flexor (134)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00827002104068), received between Jul 2, 2024 and Jul 2, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Unraveled Material1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 2, 2024Break; Unraveled Material; Break; Unraveled Material

    AS REPORTED, DURING A ¿LR¿ RUNOFF AND AORTOGRAM UNDER CONSCIOUS SEDATION, A FLEXOR BALKIN GUIDING SHEATH UNRAVELED AND SEPARATED IN THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT HAD A HISTORY OF ATHEROSCLEROSIS AND PAIN IN THE LEFT LEG, AS WELL AS EXTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY DISEASE. ULTRASOUND GUIDED MICROPUNCTURE ACCESS WAS OBTAINED IN THE RIGHT FEMORAL ARTERY USING A COOK 4-FRENCH MICROPUNCTURE KIT. THE PATIENT'S GROIN (ACCESS SITE) WAS REPORTEDLY CALCIFIED AND SCARRED. A FULL AND COMPLETE DIAGNOSTIC PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAPHY OF THE RIGHT LEG WAS PERFORMED. THE MICROPUNCTURE SHEATH WAS UPSIZED TO ANOTHER MANUFACTURER¿S 6-FRENCH, 10-CENTIMETER SHEATH, AND THE USER CROSSED OVER TO THE LEFT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY, USING ANOTHER MANUFACTURER¿S ¿UF¿ CATHETER AND A ¿SOFT STORQ¿ WIRE. ANOTHER MANUFACTURER¿S WIRE WAS THEN USED TO CROSS A CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION/LESION WITHIN THE LEFT EXTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY. THE USER THEN ATTEMPTED TO EXCHANGE THE OTHER MANUFACTURER¿S SHEATH FOR THE COMPLAINT DEVICE. THE SHEATH WOULD NOT ADVANCE OVER THE WIRE GUIDE, SO THE WIRE WAS REPLACED WITH A COOK AMPLATZ .035 STIFF WIRE; HOWEVER, THE SHEATH WOULD ONLY ADVANCE TWO INCHES OR LESS INTO THE PATIENT. THE USER THEN INSERTED THE DILATOR A

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 19661238 ↗

Other INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices

All INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page