Flexor G11634Recalls & reported problems
Cook Incorporated · Flexor, Check-Flo, Introducer Raabe Modification · Class 2
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002116344), received between May 18, 2017 and Feb 25, 2025 — classified as 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component2
- Break1
- Defective Device1
- Material Deformation1
- Material Integrity Problem1
- Material Separation1
- Material Split, Cut or Torn1
- Unsealed Device Packaging1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Patient Involvement2
- Insufficient Information1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 25, 2025Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED 26FEB2025. CONTRALATERAL ACCESS WAS OBTAINED IN THE RIGHT COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY TO TARGET THE LEFT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY. THE ACCESS SITE WAS NOT SCARRED, THE ANATOMY WAS NOT STENOSED, TORTUOUS, OR CALCIFIED, AND THE BIFURCATION WAS NOT STEEP OR CALCIFIED. ANOTHER MANUFACTURER¿S WIRE GUIDE, ATHERECTOMY DEVICE, AND STENT WERE PLACED THROUGH THE SHEATH DURING THE PROCEDURE. RESISTANCE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED DURING INSERTION OR REMOVAL OF THE SHEATH OR DURING INSERTION OR REMOVAL OF ANY DEVICE THROUGH THE SHEATH. THE DILATOR WAS REINSERTED PRIOR TO REMOVAL OF THE SHEATH OVER THE WIRE GUIDE. THE SHEATH HUB WAS USED TO PULL THE DEVICE FROM THE PATIENT, AT WHICH POINT THE SHEATH SEPARATED AT THE HUB. PER THE REPORTER, THE SHEATH (¿OUTER LAYER¿) THEN SLID FREELY OVER THE DILATOR (¿INNER LAYER¿). THE USER IDENTIFIED THE ISSUE IMMEDIATELY, ADJUSTED HIS GRIP AND HELD THE SHEATH AND DILATOR TOGETHER, AND CAREFULLY REMOVED THE DEVICE OVER THE WIRE. NO ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES WERE NEEDED, AND THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21462955 ↗MalfunctionNov 17, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Material Deformation; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Material Deformation
AS REPORTED, DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY AND STENTING PROCEDURE, THE DISTAL HUB/VALVE OF A FLEXOR RAABE GUIDING SHEATH WAS SEPARATED FROM THE SHEATH. THE PROCEDURE WAS INVOLVING A RIGHT LOWER LIMB CRITICAL ISCHEMIA. ADDITIONAL PATIENT AND EVENT INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12830377 ↗MalfunctionNov 17, 2020Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
AS REPORTED, PRIOR TO PATIENT CONTACT, THE DILATOR OF A FLEXOR RAABE GUIDING SHEATH WAS FOUND TO BE SPLIT UPON FLUSHING THE DEVICE. THE PACKAGE WAS NOT DAMAGED AND THE DEVICE WAS STORED "AS REQUIREMENT". THE DEVICE WAS NOT USED, AND ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10855980 ↗MalfunctionJul 18, 2019Unsealed Device Packaging; Unsealed Device Packaging
NO NEW PATIENT OR EVENT INFORMATION TO REPORT.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 8803359 ↗MalfunctionMay 18, 2017Defective Device; Material Integrity Problem
DURING PREPARATION OF THE PROCEDURE IT WAS NOTED THAT THE INTRODUCER HAD A DEFECT IN THE DILATOR, THERE WAS THE PRESENCE OF CLEFT IN THE TIP. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE DID NOT MAKE PATIENT CONTACT.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 6577112 ↗MalfunctionMay 18, 2017Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED DURING A RECANALIZATION OF ARTERIOSCLEROSIS OBLITERANS PROCEDURE USING A FLEXOR RAABE GUIDING SHEATH, THE SHEATH WAS SEPARATED FROM THE HEMOSTASIS VALVE. THE END USER FINISHED THE PROCEDURE WITH ANOTHER NEW DEVICE. THE SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN IN THE PATIENT'S BODY AND THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6576602 ↗
Other INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices
- VIZIGO D138502Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER2 recalls4 deaths2,839 reports
- VIZIGO D138501Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER2 recalls2 deaths2,005 reports
- Swartz™ 407451St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER5 deaths728 reports
- Edwards eSheath+ Introducer set 914ESPEdwards Lifesciences LLC · Introducer, Catheter22 deaths532 reports
- Fast-Cath™ 406849St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER420 reports
- VIZIGO D138503Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER362 reports
- Agilis™ G408318St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER333 reports
- Agilis™ NxT Steerable Introducer Dual-Reach™ SI-1371-MSt. Jude Medical, Inc. · Introducer, catheter1 death301 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page