Skip to content

Check-Flo G12423Recalls & reported problems

Cook Incorporated · Micropuncture Check-Flo Performer Introducer Set · Class 2

All models of Check-Flo (19)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002124233), received between Feb 3, 2021 and Feb 20, 2025 — classified as 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Unraveled Material” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Unraveled Material2
  • Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material1
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1
  • Packaging Problem1
  • Unsealed Device Packaging1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
  • No Patient Involvement1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 20, 2025Unraveled Material; Unraveled Material

    AS REPORTED, UPON OPENING THE PACKAGE PRIOR TO USE FOR AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, THE DISTAL END OF A PERFORMER INTRODUCER¿S WIRE WAS ELONGATED/UNRAVELED. THE WIRE DID NOT MAKE PATIENT CONTACT. ANOTHER WIRE WAS USED TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS NOT HOSPITALIZED, DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES, AND DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21424021 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 12, 2024Unraveled Material; Unraveled Material

    AS REPORTED, DURING A PROCEDURE INVOLVING TREATMENT OF VARICOSE VEINS WITHIN THE LEG, A WIRE GUIDE INCLUDED WITH A PERFORMER INTRODUCER UNRAVELED UPON REMOVAL OF THE DEVICE. PERCUTANEOUS NEEDLE ACCESS WAS OBTAINED IN THE FEMORAL ARTERY, AND THE ACCESS SITE WAS NORMAL. ULTRASOUND GUIDANCE WAS NOT USED TO OBTAIN ACCESS, AND BLOOD RETURN WAS NOT NOTED UPON INSERTION OF THE ACCESS NEEDLE, PRIOR TO ADVANCEMENT OF THE WIRE GUIDE. THE WIRE WAS ADVANCED THROUGH THE ACCESS NEEDLE, AND THE NEEDLE WAS REMOVED. SLIGHT RESISTANCE WAS REPORTED UPON INSERTION AND/OR REMOVAL OF THE DEVICE COMPONENTS. THE 6-FRENCH SHEATH WAS ADVANCED ALONG THE WIRE. WHEN THE USER ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE THE WIRE, IT COULD NOT BE REMOVED FROM THE SHEATH. WHEN THE WIRE WAS REMOVED, IT WAS FOUND TO BE UNRAVELED. PER THE REPORTER, THE WIRE WAS PULLED BACKWARDS AND/OR REMOVED THROUGH THE ENTRY NEEDLE AT SOME POINT. THE USER IMMEDIATELY REPLACED THE DEVICE TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. A DELAY IN TREATMENT WAS REPORTED; HOWEVER, THERE WERE NO ADVERSE EFFECTS TO THE PATIENT AS A RESULT. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19733408 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 21, 2023Unsealed Device Packaging; Unsealed Device Packaging

    NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT AND/OR EVENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16585556 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 10, 2022Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    AS REPORTED, DURING A PROCEDURE INVOLVING THE GREAT SAPHENOUS VEIN, THE TIP OF A PERFORMER INTRODUCER SPLIT UPON INSERTION OF THE DEVICE. THE DEVICE WAS FLUSHED WITH HEPARINIZED SALINE AND THE USER ATTEMPTED TO INSERT THE SHEATH AND DILATOR OVER A WIRE GUIDE INTO THE DISTAL GREAT SAPHENOUS VEIN, AT WHICH POINT THE TIP OF THE SHEATH WAS NOTED TO BE SPLIT WITH SHARP EDGES. THE ANATOMY WAS MODERATELY TORTUOUS. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THERE HAS BEEN NO REPORT THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS OR REQUIRED ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14658833 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 3, 2021Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Packaging Problem; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Packaging Problem

    NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT AND/OR EVENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 11274017 ↗

Other INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices

All INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page