Flexor G13069Recalls & reported problems
Cook Incorporated · Flexor, Check-Flo, Introducer Raabe Modification · Class 2
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 15
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 6
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 15 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002130692), received between Dec 23, 2016 and Dec 30, 2024 — classified as 6 injuries, 9 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Unraveled Material” (6 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Unraveled Material6
- Material Separation5
- Break3
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Device Markings/Labelling Problem1
- Fluid/Blood Leak1
- Material Split, Cut or Torn1
- Peeled/Delaminated1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions7
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient4
- No Code Available3
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- No Patient Involvement1
Recent adverse event reports
The 15 most recent of 15 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 30, 2024Break; Unraveled Material; Break; Unraveled Material
AS REPORTED, DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, A FLEXOR RAABE GUIDING SHEATH UNRAVELED UPON WITHDRAWAL FROM THE PATIENT. THE SHEATH WAS MANUALLY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT AFTER UNRAVELING. AN X-RAY WAS PERFORMED TO DETERMINE IF ANY PART OF THE DEVICE WAS LEFT IN THE PATIENT; HOWEVER, NOTHING WAS FOUND, AND THE USER WAS REPORTEDLY SATISFIED THAT NO PART OF THE DEVICE REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES OR EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21036952 ↗MalfunctionOct 30, 2024Unraveled Material; Unraveled Material
NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT AND/OR EVENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20567028 ↗MalfunctionJan 24, 2024Peeled/Delaminated; Material Separation; Unraveled Material; Peeled/Delaminated; Material Separation; Unraveled Material
AS REPORTED, DURING AN UNSPECIFIED VASCULAR CASE, A FLEXOR RAABE GUIDING SHEATH TORE DURING USE. ANOTHER DEVICE OF THE SAME TYPE WAS USED TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. UPON RETURN AND INITIAL EVALUATION OF THE DEVICE, THE SHEATH MATERIAL WAS SEPARATED, BUT HELD TOGETHER BY UNRAVELED COILS. DELAMINATION WAS NOTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18574909 ↗InjuryJun 16, 2023Break; Break
NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT AND/OR EVENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17145336 ↗InjuryJun 16, 2023Break; Break
NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT AND/OR EVENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17145328 ↗MalfunctionFeb 16, 2023Unraveled Material; Unraveled Material
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AT THE END OF AN UNSPECIFIED ANGIO PROCEDURE, A FLEXOR RAABE GUIDING SHEATH BEGAN TO UNRAVEL AS THE USER WAS PULLING THE DEVICE OVER A STIFF WIRE FROM THE PATIENT. THE DEVICE WAS ABLE TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A DIFFERENT UNSPECIFIED SHEATH TO FINISH THE CASE. AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS OR REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. THERE WAS NOT ANY UNINTENDED SECTION OF THE DEVICE LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16386442 ↗MalfunctionJun 29, 2021Device Markings/Labelling Problem; Device Markings/Labelling Problem
NO NEW PATIENT OR EVENT INFORMATION TO REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12085419 ↗MalfunctionAug 28, 2019Material Separation; Material Separation
NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT AND/OR EVENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8940537 ↗MalfunctionApr 5, 2019Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak
NO NEW PATIENT OR EVENT INFORMATION RECEIVED SINCE THE LAST REPORT WAS SUBMITTED.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 8487253 ↗InjuryFeb 25, 2019Unraveled Material; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Unraveled Material; Material Split, Cut or Torn
NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT AND/OR EVENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 8367423 ↗InjuryNov 8, 2018Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED, DURING REMOVAL OF ANOTHER MANUFACTURER'S 0.035 INCH GUIDE WIRE THROUGH THE FLEXOR RAABE GUIDING SHEATH, THE HUB OF THE SHEATH WAS PULLED OFF. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THERE WERE KNOTS ON THE GUIDE WIRE WHICH CAUSED THE HUB TO SEPARATE FROM THE COMPLAINT DEVICE. AT THE TIME OF THE EVENT, THE PHYSICIAN WAS TREATING A STENOSIS IN THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). THERE WAS NO REPORT OF DIFFICULT ADVANCEMENT OR REMOVAL. THE PROCEDURE WAS BEING PERFORMED VIA THE IPSALATERAL APPROACH IN THE PATIENT'S RIGHT GROIN AND THE AREA BEING TREATED WAS TORTUOUS BUT NOT CALCIFIED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED RELATIVE TO THE EVENTS TAKING PLACE DURING REMOVAL OF THE WIRE GUIDE. WHEN THE HUB SEPARATED ONLY THE WIRE GUIDE WAS INSIDE THE COMPLAINT SHEATH. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO QUICKLY REMOVE BOTH THE COMPLAINT SHEATH AND THE WIRE GUIDE USING CLAMPS AND BOTH WERE REMOVED TOGETHER. AFTER THE REMOVAL, THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH NO ADVERSE EFFECTS TO THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO SIGNIFICANT BLOOD LOSS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 8051069 ↗MalfunctionMay 18, 2018Material Separation; Material Separation
NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT AND/OR EVENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7525423 ↗InjuryApr 3, 2018Material Separation; Material Separation
NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT AND/OR EVENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; No Code Available
MAUDE report 7393451 ↗MalfunctionDec 29, 2017Material Separation; Material Separation
IT HAS BEEN REPORTED THAT A FLEXOR RAABE GUIDING SHEATH DEVICE SEPARATED UPON REMOVAL DURING AN ANGIOGRAM PROCEDURE. THE DEVICE WAS PLACED IN THE PATIENT'S "LEG" AND WAS BEING USED VIA CONTRALATERAL APPROACH. ALTHOUGH ANOTHER MANUFACTURER'S WIRE GUIDE WAS INSIDE THE SHEATH, IT WAS SAID THAT THE PHYSICIAN WAS WITHDRAWING THE SHEATH FROM THE PATIENT WITHOUT HAVING THE DILATOR PLACED WHEN THE SEPARATION OCCURRED. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO HAVE NORMAL BODY HABITUS. NO UNINTENDED SECTION OF THE DEVICE REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT'S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE, NOR HAVE ANY ADVERSE EVENTS BEEN REPORTED REGARDING THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7155022 ↗InjuryDec 23, 2016Unraveled Material; Unraveled Material
AFTER A BTK INTERVENTION, THE DEVICE WAS BEING TAKEN OUT AND IT UNRAVELED INSIDE THE PATIENT'S BODY. THE DILATOR WAS IN PLACE WHILE REMOVING THE SHEATH. THE PHYSICIAN STENTED THE REMAINING PORTION OF THE SHEATH AGAINST THE PATIENT'S VESSEL WALL.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6202285 ↗
Other INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices
- VIZIGO D138502Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER2 recalls4 deaths2,839 reports
- VIZIGO D138501Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER2 recalls2 deaths2,005 reports
- Swartz™ 407451St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER5 deaths728 reports
- Edwards eSheath+ Introducer set 914ESPEdwards Lifesciences LLC · Introducer, Catheter22 deaths532 reports
- Fast-Cath™ 406849St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER420 reports
- VIZIGO D138503Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER362 reports
- Agilis™ G408318St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER333 reports
- Agilis™ NxT Steerable Introducer Dual-Reach™ SI-1371-MSt. Jude Medical, Inc. · Introducer, catheter1 death301 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page