Soft-Pass G18658Recalls & reported problems
Cook Incorporated · Soft-Pass EchoTip Embryo Transfer Catheter Set · Class 2
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002186583), received between Apr 23, 2018 and Apr 21, 2026 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break1
- Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping1
Patient problems
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 21, 2026Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping
AS REPORTED, FOREIGN MATTER RESEMBLING A FIBER WAS NOTED ON THE "RIGHT SIDE OF THE TIP AND THE ECHO METAL" OF A SOFT-PASS ECHOTIP EMBRYO TRANSFER CATHETER SET DURING A FROZEN EMBRYO TRANSFER (FET) PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THERE HAS BEEN NO REPORT OF THE PATIENT EXPERIENCING ADVERSE EFFECTS. HOWEVER, THE USER EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT THE POTENTIAL IMPACT ON EMBRYO IMPLANTATION RESULTS. THE USER IS WAITING FOR THE PATIENT'S RESULTS WHICH SHOULD BE APPROXIMATELY NINE DAYS AFTER THE PROCEDURES WERE PERFORMED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24940112 ↗MalfunctionApr 23, 2018Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AT THE TIME OF MAKING AN EMBRYO TRANSFER, THE ECHOTIP FROM THE SOFT-PASS ECHOTIP EMBRYO TRANSFER CATHETER SET HAD DETACHED AND WAS LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT. THE ECHOTIP FROM THE CATHETER WAS NOT RETRIEVED. THE DOCTOR STATED THAT THE CATHETER HAD BEEN REUSED BY HIS ASSISTANT. PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU) THE DEVICE IS INTENDED FOR ONE-TIME USE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque
MAUDE report 7451936 ↗
Other CATHETER, ASSISTED REPRODUCTION devices
- Guardia G34783Cook Incorporated · CATHETER, ASSISTED REPRODUCTION62 reports
- Pivet G30457Cook Incorporated · CATHETER, ASSISTED REPRODUCTION29 reports
- Guardia G53007Cook Incorporated · CATHETER, ASSISTED REPRODUCTION10 reports
- Soft-Pass G18955Cook Incorporated · CATHETER, ASSISTED REPRODUCTION8 reports
- Guardia G24216Cook Incorporated · CATHETER, ASSISTED REPRODUCTION5 reports
- Sydney IVF G18740Cook Incorporated · CATHETER, ASSISTED REPRODUCTION3 reports
- Soft-Pass G30399Cook Incorporated · CATHETER, ASSISTED REPRODUCTION2 reports
- Soft-Trans G26669Cook Incorporated · CATHETER, ASSISTED REPRODUCTION2 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.