Tracer Metro G25686Recalls & reported problems
Cook Incorporated · Tracer Metro Direct Wire Guide · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002256866), received between Sep 24, 2018 and Sep 2, 2026 — classified as 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Peeled/Delaminated” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Peeled/Delaminated4
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Migration1
- Positioning Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
- No Patient Involvement1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 2, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50555690 ↗MalfunctionMay 8, 2025Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated
DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC STONE REMOVAL FROM CBD PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN USED A COOK TRACER METRO DIRECT WIRE GUIDE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE [WIRE GUIDE] TIP BENT AND OUTER COATING PEELED OFF. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21987851 ↗MalfunctionApr 12, 2019Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated
DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP), THE PHYSICIAN USED A COOK TRACER METRO DIRECT WIRE GUIDE. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO COOK VIA MEDWATCH REPORT (B)(4): "WIRE GOT STUCK IN A RETRIEVAL BALLOON, AND DID NOT FUNCTION PROPERLY. THE COATING OF THE WIRE SHEARED OFF AND GOT CAUGHT." OUR ATTEMPTS TO COLLECT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING PATIENT OUTCOME WERE UNSUCCESSFUL. WHILE THE COMPLAINANT DID NOT SPECIFY IF THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS OR REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MEDICAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS EVENT, THE INFORMATION ABLE TO BE COLLECTED DOES NOT REASONABLY SUGGEST THE PATIENT WAS ADVERSELY IMPACTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8510343 ↗MalfunctionNov 21, 2018Peeled/Delaminated; Positioning Problem; Migration; Peeled/Delaminated; Positioning Problem; Migration
DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP), THE PHYSICIAN USED A COOK TRACER METRO DIRECT WIRE GUIDE. THE COATING OF THE WIRE GOT DAMAGED. THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON (B)(6) 2018, THE WIRE GUIDE WAS PLACED OVER A CATHETER/SPHINCTEROTOME AND LEFT IN THE BILE DUCT. A METAL STENT WAS ADVANCED OVER THE WIRE GUIDE, BUT COULD NOT BE ADVANCED FULLY AS IT GOT STUCK. EVERYTHING WAS REMOVED [LOST WIRE GUIDE ACCESS]. DAMAGE AND STRIPPING OF THE COATING OF THE WIRE GUIDE WAS VISIBLE. PLACEMENT OF A NEW WIRE GUIDE AND FINISHED PROCEDURE WITH THIS NEW DEVICE. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8095057 ↗MalfunctionSep 24, 2018Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated
DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP), THE PHYSICIAN USED A COOK TRACER METRO DIRECT WIRE GUIDE. THE PHYSICIAN WANTED TO CANNULATE BY USING ANOTHER MANUFACTURER'S DEVICE AND A METII-35-480. THE ASSISTANT NURSE OPENED THE PACKAGE OF THE MET II-35-480 AND FLUSHED. WHEN THE NURSE TRIED TO PUT THE WIRE IN THE PORT, A PORTION OF THE COATING TIP WAS DETACHED FROM THE GUIDE WIRE [PRIOR TO ENDOSCOPE CONTACT]. THE NURSE OPENED THE NEW ONE AND IT WAS USED. FURTHER INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 09-SEPTEMBER- 2018: THE LOCATION OF THE DAMAGE OCCURRED AT THE PATIENT END, IN THE BLACK COATED TIP. THIS OCCURRED PRIOR TO PATIENT CONTACT; THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 7901527 ↗
Other Endoscopic guidewire, gastroenterology-urology devices
- HiWire G30474Cook Incorporated · Endoscopic guidewire, gastroenterology-urology82 reports
- Roadrunner G18154Cook Incorporated · Endoscopic guidewire, gastroenterology-urology1 recall18 reports
- Roadrunner G17542Cook Incorporated · Endoscopic guidewire, gastroenterology-urology1 recall9 reports
- Roadrunner G18153Cook Incorporated · Endoscopic guidewire, gastroenterology-urology1 recall6 reports
- Roadrunner G18155Cook Incorporated · Endoscopic guidewire, gastroenterology-urology1 recall3 reports
- Roadrunner G17539Cook Incorporated · Endoscopic guidewire, gastroenterology-urology1 recall2 reports
- Roadrunner G17540Cook Incorporated · Endoscopic guidewire, gastroenterology-urology1 recall0 reports
- Jagwire M00556580Boston Scientific Corporation · Endoscopic guidewire, gastroenterology-urology1 death49 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page