Skip to content

Flexor G32194Recalls & reported problems

Cook Incorporated · Flexor, Check-Flo, Introducer Set · Class 2

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002321946), received between May 10, 2018 and May 9, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Unraveled Material” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Unraveled Material3
  • Material Separation2
  • Break1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Fluid/Blood Leak1
  • Peeled/Delaminated1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 9, 2025Break; Break

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED 20MAY2025. ANTEGRADE ACCESS WAS OBTAINED IN THE LEFT GROIN FOR AN IPSILATERAL APPROACH. THE ANATOMY WAS REPORTEDLY SCARRED. PER THE REPORTER, THE USER WAS PLACING THE SHEATH WHEN THE DISTAL END SEPARATED; THEREFORE, NO OTHER DEVICES WERE USED THROUGH THE SHEATH; HOWEVER, THE REPORTER ALSO STATED THAT RESISTANCE WAS FELT DURING BOTH INSERTION AND REMOVAL OF DEVICES THROUGH THE SHEATH. REPORTEDLY, THE USER ATTEMPTED TO REINSERT THE DILATOR PRIOR TO REMOVAL OF THE SHEATH OVER A WIRE; HOWEVER, THE DILATOR WOULD NOT ADVANCE ALL THE WAY DOWN THE SHEATH.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 21996981 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 29, 2023Peeled/Delaminated; Material Separation; Unraveled Material; Peeled/Delaminated; Material Separation; Unraveled Material

    AS REPORTED, DURING A PROCEDURE INVOLVING ANGIOPLASTY OF THE RIGHT ILIAC ARTERY, A FLEXOR INTRODUCER SHEATH UNRAVELED UPON ATTEMPTED REMOVAL OF ANOTHER MANUFACTURER'S BALLOON CATHETER. ACCESS WAS OBTAINED IN THE LEFT COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY. THE BALLOON HAD BEEN DEFLATED AND NEGATIVE PRESSURE WAS MAINTAINED UPON ATTEMPTED REMOVAL OF THE OTHER MANUFACTURER'S 5-FRENCH, 8X80 BALLOON CATHETER; HOWEVER, THE BALLOON CATHETER WAS NOT ABLE TO BE PULLED THROUGH THE SHEATH. THE SHEATH AND BALLOON CATHETER WERE THEN REMOVED TOGETHER, OVER AN UNSPECIFIED STIFF ANGLED GUIDE WIRE, WITHOUT LOSING WIRE ACCESS. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. UPON RETURN AND INITIAL EVALUATION OF THE SHEATH, THE SHEATH WAS UNRAVELED AND DELAMINATED, WITH UNRAVELED COILS CONNECTING SEPARATED SHEATH MATERIAL. THE OTHER MANUFACTURER'S BALLOON CATHETER WAS LODGED INSIDE THE SHEATH.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17641647 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 10, 2021Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED 18NOV2021. THE ACCESS SITE WAS DESCRIBED AS NORMAL, AND THE ANATOMY WAS NOT TORTUOUS, CALCIFIED, OR SCARRED. AN UNKNOWN WIRE AND 5 FRENCH CATHETERS WERE USED THROUGH THE SHEATH, WHICH WAS IN PLACE FOR FORTY-FIVE MINUTES. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12788663 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 31, 2020Material Separation; Material Separation

    AS REPORTED, DURING A RIGHT LEG ARTERIOGRAM IN WHICH ACCESS WAS GAINED THROUGH THE SFA A FLEXOR INTRODUCER SHEATH WAS BEING REMOVED WHEN THE HUB SEPARATED FROM THE SHEATH. AS THE USER CONTINUED TO REMOVE THE SHEATH IT SEPARATED TWO MORE TIMES ABOUT A THIRD AND TWO THIRDS OF THE WAY DOWN THE SHEATH. ALL THREE SEGMENTS WERE STUCK TO THE COIL AND MANUALLY PULLED FROM THE PATIENT. ANOTHER SHEATH WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO PORTION OF THE DEVICE REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT. THIS DID NOT RESULT IN THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES OR PROLONGED HOSPITALIZATION. THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10470914 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 25, 2019Unraveled Material; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Unraveled Material; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT AND/OR EVENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8367463 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 10, 2018Unraveled Material; Unraveled Material

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY USING ANOTHER MANUFACTURER'S DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) THROUGH THE FLEXOR INTRODUCER SHEATH, THE BALLOON BROKE OFF IN THE RIGHT EXTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE THE BALLOON THROUGH THE SHEATH BUT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. UPON REMOVAL OF THE COMPLAINT DEVICE THE BALLOON WAS FOUND TO BE LODGED HALF WAY INSIDE AND HALF WAY OUTSIDE THE SHEATH; THE SHEATH BECAME LOOSE, SEEMED TO BE OVERWORKED, AND THE COILS LOOSENED. A FLUOROSCOPY WAS PERFORMED WHICH SHOWED NO REMAINING BALLOON/FOREIGN BODY WAS LEFT IN THE RIGHT ILIAC ARTERY. THE PHYSICIAN RE-ACCESSED THE RIGHT COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY WITH A 4F MICROPUNCTURE CATHETER TO DO AN ANGIOGRAM TO ENSURE THERE WAS NO DAMAGE TO THE ARTERY. THE MICROCATHETER WAS THEN REMOVED AND PRESSURE WAS HELD, A PRESSURE BANDAGE WAS THEN APPLIED TO ACCESS SITE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7502566 ↗

Other INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices

All INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.