Skip to content

Micropuncture G43871Recalls & reported problems

Cook Incorporated · Micropuncture Introducer Set Silhouette Transitionless With Nitinol Wire Guide · Class 2

All models of Micropuncture (39)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
10
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002438712), received between Jun 13, 2018 and Feb 26, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 8 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Unraveled Material” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Unraveled Material5
  • Material Separation2
  • Break1
  • Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material1
  • Material Integrity Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient3
  • Insufficient Information2
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 26, 2025Break; Break

    AS REPORTED, DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE VIA ACCESS IN THE FEMORAL ARTERY, THE TIP OF A MICROPUNCTURE TRANSITIONLESS ACCESS SET¿S WIRE SEPARATED IN A PATIENT DURING INSERTION OF THE DEVICE. THE ACCESS SITE WAS REPORTEDLY CALCIFIED. THE SEPARATED TIP WAS RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT VIA CUT-DOWN OF THE FEMORAL ARTERY. PER THE REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21472321 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 24, 2023Unraveled Material; Unraveled Material

    NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT AND/OR EVENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16613854 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 19, 2023Unraveled Material; Unraveled Material

    NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT AND/OR EVENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16205434 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 14, 2022Unraveled Material; Unraveled Material

    NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT AND/OR EVENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 15605929 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 9, 2022Unraveled Material; Unraveled Material

    AS REPORTED, DURING A PROCEDURE INVOLVING PLACEMENT OF AN ARTERIAL LINE, A MICROPUNCTURE TRADITIONLESS ACCESS SET'S WIRE "SHREDDED" UPON WITHDRAWAL OF THE WIRE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14644810 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 28, 2021Unraveled Material; Unraveled Material

    NO NEW PATIENT OR EVENT INFORMATION TO REPORT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 11243068 ↗
  • InjuryDec 18, 2018Material Separation; Material Separation

    NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT AND/OR EVENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 8173977 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 19, 2018Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem

    AN (B)(6) MALE WITH PAST MEDICAL HISTORY OF DIABETES (TYPE NOT SPECIFIED), MALIGNANT NEOPLASM OF THE PANCREAS, CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT (TYPE AND DATE NOT SPECIFIED), AND AORTIC STENOSIS UNDERWENT A PROCEDURE TO INSERT A MEDIPORT. PATIENT'S ANATOMY WAS NEITHER SCARRED, TORTUOUS, OR CALCIFIED. UPON REMOVAL OF THE GUIDEWIRE FROM THE SHEATH OF THE MICROPUNCTURE TRANSITIONLESS ACCESS SET, IT REPORTEDLY SHREDDED INTO STRANDS. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY ON INSERTION OF THE COMPLAINT DEVICE. NO RETAINED OBJECTS WERE SEEN UPON FLUOROSCOPY OF THE PATIENT'S CHEST AFTER THE OCCURRENCE OF THE EVENT. NO PATIENT ADVERSE EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. THE PATIENT'S OUTCOME WAS REPORTEDLY FAVORABLE. NO ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES WERE REQUIRED. MEDICATIONS ADMINISTERED DURING THE PROCEDURE WERE AS FOLLOWS: BACITRACIN FOR TOPICAL IRRIGATION OF MEDIPORT IMPLANT, MARCAINE 0.5% MIXED WITH LIDOCAINE 1% (15 ML GIVEN INTRADERMALLY TO INCISION SITE), 2G OF ANCEF FOR INTRAOPERATIVE ANTIBIOTIC, AND HEPARIN LOCK FLUSH (12ML USED TO FLUSH MEDIPORT CATHETER AT END OF CASE). ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WILL BE RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7891480 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 3, 2018Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED, DURING A DEVICE FAILURE ANALYSIS OF THE MICROPUNCTURE TRANSITIONLESS ACCESS SET THAT A PARTIAL SEPARATION OCCURRED. THE ORIGINAL INCIDENT WAS NOTED AS DIFFICULT ADVANCEMENT OF THE DEVICE IN AN UNSPECIFIED PROCEDURE. AFTER REMOVING THE FIRST DEVICE, ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED AND NO FURTHER ISSUES WERE REPORTED. HOWEVER, AFTER MANUFACTURER EVALUATION, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE COILS APPEARED "PUSHED AWAY" FROM THE SOLDER CONNECTION BETWEEN THE MANDRILL AND COIL. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7746805 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 13, 2018Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material

    IT WAS REPORTED, A HAIR WAS NOTED WITHIN THE STERILE PACKAGE OF A MICROPUNCTURE TRANSITIONLESS ACCESS SET PRIOR TO USE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS NOT USED. A DIFFERENT SET WAS OPENED AND USED TO BEGIN THE PROCEDURE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, NO PATIENT ADVERSE EVENTS WERE EXPERIENCED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7598108 ↗

Other INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices

All INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page