Flexor Parallel G56438Recalls & reported problems
Cook Incorporated · Flexor, Parallel Rapid Release Ureteral Access Sheath with AQ, Hydrophilic Coating · Class 2
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002564381), received between Apr 10, 2018 and Apr 1, 2025 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Coiled” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Coiled1
- Device Operates Differently Than Expected1
- Unsealed Device Packaging1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 1, 2025Unsealed Device Packaging; Unsealed Device Packaging
IT WAS REPORTED THE FLEXOR PARALLEL URETERAL ACCESS SHEATH AND DILATORS¿ PACKAGE WAS FOUND UNSEALED DURING AN UNSPECIFIED PROCEDURE. UPON OPENING THE PACKAGE, THE SHEATH SLIPPED OUT REPORTEDLY DUE TO A MISSING SEAM. IT WAS NOT USED. A NEW SHEATH WAS OPENED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE IS NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS ISSUE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21741766 ↗MalfunctionApr 10, 2018Coiled; Device Operates Differently Than Expected
THE COMPLAINANT REPORTED THAT THE FLEXOR PARALLEL URETERAL ACCESS SHEATH WAS IN POSITION AND WHEN THE DILATOR WAS REMOVED, THE WIRE WAS RELEASED ON THE TIP FOR REMAINING ACCESS IN THE WORKING CHANNEL. THE WIRE WAS CURLED UP SPIRALLY DURING THE PROCEDURE, SO WORKING CHANNEL ACCESS WAS NO LONGER POSSIBLE. IT WAS FURTHER NOTED THAT AN UNIDENTIFIED WIRE WAS UNCOILED. THERE WERE NO REPORTED SERIOUS INJURIES TO THE PATIENT AS A RESULT OF THE REPORTED PRODUCT PROBLEM.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7419335 ↗
Other endoscopic access overtube, gastroenterology-urology devices
- EVIS EXERA II SMALL INTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE OLYMPUS SIF TYPE Q180Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · endoscopic access overtube, gastroenterology-urology1 recall42 reports
- Trokamed WA2PS20STROKAMED GmbH · Endoscopic Access Overtube, Gastroenterology-Urology1 recall2 deaths2 reports
- Trokamed WA2PS20LTROKAMED GmbH · Endoscopic Access Overtube, Gastroenterology-Urology1 recall2 deaths2 reports
- Trokamed WA2PS18LTROKAMED GmbH · Endoscopic Access Overtube, Gastroenterology-Urology1 recall0 reports
- Trokamed WA2PS18STROKAMED GmbH · Endoscopic Access Overtube, Gastroenterology-Urology1 recall0 reports
- Navigator HD M0062502220Boston Scientific Corporation · endoscopic access overtube, gastroenterology-urology1 death31 reports
- Navigator HD M0062502230Boston Scientific Corporation · endoscopic access overtube, gastroenterology-urology29 reports
- Proxis™ Ureteral Access Sheath 231045C. R. Bard, Inc. · endoscopic access overtube, gastroenterology-urology22 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.