Skip to content

Savary Gilliard G57280Recalls & reported problems

Cook Incorporated · Savary Gilliard Wire Guide · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002572805), received between Jan 29, 2020 and Jan 7, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Twisted/Bent” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Twisted/Bent3

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
  • Perforation of Esophagus1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 7, 2026Material Twisted/Bent

    IN PREPARATION FOR AN ENDOSCOPIC PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN USED A COOK SAVARY-GILLIARD WIRE GUIDE. IT WAS REPORTED [THAT] WHEN USER OPENED THE PACKAGE, THEY NOTICED THAT THE TIP OF THE WIRE WAS SIGNIFICANTLY KINKED. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE OF THE SAME TYPE. THIS OCCURRED PRIOR TO PATIENT CONTACT; THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT. IN ADDITION, THE PATIENT SUSTAINED NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCE AND THERE WERE NO ADVERSE EFFECTS TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23993951 ↗
  • InjuryJun 26, 2020Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

    DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN USED A COOK SAVARY-GILLIARD WIRE GUIDE. THE DEVICE WAS ADVANCED AND THE DILATION WAS PERFORMED. WHEN GUIDE WIRE WAS REMOVED IT WAS NOTED THAT THE WIRE WAS BROKEN AT THE BASE OF THE SPRING COIL. THE PHYSICIAN THEN NOTED THAT DUE TO THE BROKEN WIRE THE ESOPHAGUS WAS PERFORATED. USING A COMPETITORS CLIPPING DEVICE EIGHT CLIPS WERE DEPLOYED TO CLOSE THE PERFORATION SUCCESSFULLY. THE PATIENT WAS TRANSPORTED TO IN-HOUSE TO BE MONITORED. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT REQUIRED THE USE OF CLIPS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. THE PATIENT WAS TRANSPORTED TO IN-HOUSE TO BE MONITORED.

    Patient problems: Perforation of Esophagus

    MAUDE report 10201180 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 29, 2020Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

    DURING A DILATION PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN USED A COOK SAVARY-GILLIARD WIRE GUIDE. THE PHYSICIAN WAS DILATING A STRICTURE AND NOTED THE WIRE WAS "NOT GOING DOWN", SO HE PULLED IT OUT AND FOUND THAT THE WIRE WAS BENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A REUSABLE WIRE GUIDE. OUR ATTEMPTS TO COLLECT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING PATIENT OUTCOME WERE UNSUCCESSFUL. WHILE THE COMPLAINANT DID NOT SPECIFY IF THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS OR REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MEDICAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS EVENT, THE INFORMATION ABLE TO BE COLLECTED DOES NOT REASONABLY SUGGEST THE PATIENT WAS ADVERSELY IMPACTED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 9641649 ↗

Other Dilator, esophageal devices

All Dilator, esophageal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page