Skip to content

INBONE 200011904Recalls & reported problems

Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of INBONE (56)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
7
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00840420123916), received between Feb 14, 2022 and Dec 10, 2025 — classified as 7 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Osseointegration Problem3
  • Migration2
  • Biocompatibility1
  • Implant subsidence1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration3
  • Unspecified Infection3
  • Implant Pain2
  • Pain2
  • Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • Discomfort1
  • Extraskeletal ossification1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 10, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Migration; Implant subsidence; Osseointegration Problem; Migration; Implant subsidence

    THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT HAS MULTIPLE FRACTURES IN THE TIBIA AND MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO SUBSIDENCE OF THE TIBIAL COMPONENT AND THE IMPLANT TILTING INTO VARUS, CAUSING SIGNIFICANT PAIN.

    Patient problems: Extraskeletal ossification; Inadequate Osseointegration; Limb Fracture; Pain

    MAUDE report 23771550 ↗
  • InjuryMay 20, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO PAIN AND LOOSENING.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain

    MAUDE report 22056570 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 18, 2025Biocompatibility; Biocompatibility

    THE PATIENT REPORTED EXPERIENCING A SEVERE ALLERGIC REACTION AND INFECTION RELATED TO THE METAL COMPONENTS IN A STRYKER PRODUCT. THEY ALSO ALLEGE CHRONIC FOOT PAIN CAUSED BY THE IMPLANTS AND HAVE REQUESTED AN ANKLE AMPUTATION, STATING THEY DO NOT BELIEVE THEY ARE A SUITABLE CANDIDATE FOR AN ANKLE PROSTHESIS. POSTOPERATIVELY, THE PATIENT¿S PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIAN EXAMINED THE ANKLE AND NOTED SIGNS CONSISTENT WITH INFECTION. THE PATIENT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY PRESCRIBED ANTIBIOTICS. DURING A FOLLOW-UP WITH THE SURGEON, THEY WERE ADVISED TO USE NUMBER TWO COMPRESSION SOCKS. THE PATIENT IS CURRENTLY SEEKING ADDITIONAL MEDICAL OPINIONS REGARDING NEXT STEPS AND HAS MENTIONED IDENTIFYING A SURGEON WHO MAY BE ABLE TO PERFORM THE ANKLE AMPUTATION.

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Discomfort; Fever; Implant Pain; Unspecified Infection; Wound Dehiscence; Wound Odor

    MAUDE report 21393238 ↗
  • InjuryAug 18, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A TOTAL ANKLE REPLACEMENT. THE PATIENT HAD AN INFECTION, THE TOTAL ANKLE WAS EXPLANTED AND A CEMENT SPACER WAS INSERTED. THE PATIENT WAS WASHED OUT AND A POLY EXCHANGE WAS DONE ALONG WITH ANTIBIOTICS.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 17575128 ↗
  • InjuryMar 10, 2023Osseointegration Problem; Migration; Osseointegration Problem; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A TOTAL ANKLE REPLACEMENT. ALLEGEDLY, THE PATIENT MAY NEED TO UNDERGO A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO PAIN AND LOOSENING OF THE TIBIA STEM OF THE PROSTHESIS. NO OPERATING HAS BEEN DONE. THE PATIENT HAS BEEN GOING THROUGH PHYSICAL THERAPY WITH NO POSITIVE RETURNS.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain; Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 16522467 ↗
  • InjuryJun 27, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD AN INFECTION AND UNDERWENT A PROCEDURE TO REMOVE THE IMPLANT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 14836514 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 14, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A REVISION SURGERY THE PATIENT SUFFERED AN ANTERIOR MIDLINE FRACTURE OF THE TIBIA UPON IMPLANTATION OF THE TIBIAL STEMS. THE SURGEON USED A PLATE AND SCREWS TO TREAT THE FRACTURE. THE SURGEON EXPECTS THE PATIENT TO RECOVER WELL AND WILL PROCEED WITH NON-WEIGHT BEARING FOR 8 WEEKS.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 13529273 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page