INBONE 200011904Recalls & reported problems
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant
All models of INBONE (56)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 7
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00840420123916), received between Feb 14, 2022 and Dec 10, 2025 — classified as 7 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
- Osseointegration Problem3
- Migration2
- Biocompatibility1
- Implant subsidence1
Patient problems
- Inadequate Osseointegration3
- Unspecified Infection3
- Implant Pain2
- Pain2
- Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
- Bone Fracture(s)1
- Discomfort1
- Extraskeletal ossification1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryDec 10, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Migration; Implant subsidence; Osseointegration Problem; Migration; Implant subsidence
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT HAS MULTIPLE FRACTURES IN THE TIBIA AND MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO SUBSIDENCE OF THE TIBIAL COMPONENT AND THE IMPLANT TILTING INTO VARUS, CAUSING SIGNIFICANT PAIN.
Patient problems: Extraskeletal ossification; Inadequate Osseointegration; Limb Fracture; Pain
MAUDE report 23771550 ↗InjuryMay 20, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO PAIN AND LOOSENING.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain
MAUDE report 22056570 ↗InjuryFeb 18, 2025Biocompatibility; Biocompatibility
THE PATIENT REPORTED EXPERIENCING A SEVERE ALLERGIC REACTION AND INFECTION RELATED TO THE METAL COMPONENTS IN A STRYKER PRODUCT. THEY ALSO ALLEGE CHRONIC FOOT PAIN CAUSED BY THE IMPLANTS AND HAVE REQUESTED AN ANKLE AMPUTATION, STATING THEY DO NOT BELIEVE THEY ARE A SUITABLE CANDIDATE FOR AN ANKLE PROSTHESIS. POSTOPERATIVELY, THE PATIENT¿S PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIAN EXAMINED THE ANKLE AND NOTED SIGNS CONSISTENT WITH INFECTION. THE PATIENT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY PRESCRIBED ANTIBIOTICS. DURING A FOLLOW-UP WITH THE SURGEON, THEY WERE ADVISED TO USE NUMBER TWO COMPRESSION SOCKS. THE PATIENT IS CURRENTLY SEEKING ADDITIONAL MEDICAL OPINIONS REGARDING NEXT STEPS AND HAS MENTIONED IDENTIFYING A SURGEON WHO MAY BE ABLE TO PERFORM THE ANKLE AMPUTATION.
Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Discomfort; Fever; Implant Pain; Unspecified Infection; Wound Dehiscence; Wound Odor
MAUDE report 21393238 ↗InjuryAug 18, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A TOTAL ANKLE REPLACEMENT. THE PATIENT HAD AN INFECTION, THE TOTAL ANKLE WAS EXPLANTED AND A CEMENT SPACER WAS INSERTED. THE PATIENT WAS WASHED OUT AND A POLY EXCHANGE WAS DONE ALONG WITH ANTIBIOTICS.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 17575128 ↗InjuryMar 10, 2023Osseointegration Problem; Migration; Osseointegration Problem; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A TOTAL ANKLE REPLACEMENT. ALLEGEDLY, THE PATIENT MAY NEED TO UNDERGO A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO PAIN AND LOOSENING OF THE TIBIA STEM OF THE PROSTHESIS. NO OPERATING HAS BEEN DONE. THE PATIENT HAS BEEN GOING THROUGH PHYSICAL THERAPY WITH NO POSITIVE RETURNS.
Patient problems: Implant Pain; Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 16522467 ↗InjuryJun 27, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD AN INFECTION AND UNDERWENT A PROCEDURE TO REMOVE THE IMPLANT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 14836514 ↗InjuryFeb 14, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A REVISION SURGERY THE PATIENT SUFFERED AN ANTERIOR MIDLINE FRACTURE OF THE TIBIA UPON IMPLANTATION OF THE TIBIAL STEMS. THE SURGEON USED A PLATE AND SCREWS TO TREAT THE FRACTURE. THE SURGEON EXPECTS THE PATIENT TO RECOVER WELL AND WILL PROCEED WITH NON-WEIGHT BEARING FOR 8 WEEKS.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 13529273 ↗
Other PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER devices
- Vantage 350-22-03Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Ankle, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer2 recalls2 reports
- Vantage 350-21-04Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Ankle, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer2 recalls0 reports
- INFINITY 33630023Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER60 reports
- INFINITY 33600020Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER1 recall9 reports
- Vantage 350-22-02Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Ankle, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer1 recall5 reports
- INFINITY 33650003Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER55 reports
- INFINITY 33630022Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER54 reports
- INFINITY 33600030Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER1 recall4 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page