INBONE 220222903Recalls & reported problems
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant
All models of INBONE (56)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 8
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00840420124272), received between Jan 6, 2022 and May 28, 2026 — classified as 8 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem5
- Loss of Osseointegration2
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
- Osseointegration Problem1
- Use of Device Problem1
Patient problems
- Inadequate Osseointegration3
- Bone Fracture(s)2
- Pain2
- Unspecified Infection2
- Discomfort1
- Implant Pain1
- Insufficient Information1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 28, 2026Loss of Osseointegration
THE STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN FOR AN UPCOMING REVISION SURGERY. THE TALAR COMPONENT WAS INITIALLY IMPLANTED TOO FAR LATERAL AND WAS IMPINGING ON THE FIBULA. THE TALAR COMPONENT WAS REMOVED. UPON REMOVAL, THE SURGEON DISCOVERED THE TIBIAL COMPONENT WAS LOOSE, IT WAS REMOVED.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 25319200 ↗InjuryMar 30, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A DEVICE EXPLANT SURGERY FOR REASONS THAT ARE NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT. THE PATIENT RECEIVED A CEMENT SPACER.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 24735398 ↗InjuryOct 2, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE ANKLE JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED UNTIL (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO ACTIVE INFECTION, WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 23199766 ↗InjuryMay 20, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO PAIN AND LOOSENING.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain
MAUDE report 22056655 ↗InjuryMar 26, 2025Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING PAIN AND MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY FOR REASONS THAT ARE NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: Implant Pain; Pain
MAUDE report 21701321 ↗InjuryApr 9, 2024Use of Device Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Use of Device Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED IT WAS REPORTED THAT TWO IMPLANTS WERE FOUND TO BE DEFECTIVE DURING A PRIMARY PROPHECY INBONE CASE. THE TIBIA FRACTURED AS A RESULT OF THE REPEATED IMPACT TO THE TIBIAL PLATE AND STEM. ARTHREX PLATES AND SCREWS WERE USED TO MANAGE THE FRACTURE AS WELL AS BONE CEMENT TO HELP FIXATE THE INBONE STEM. NEW IMPLANTS WERE USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 19071615 ↗InjuryNov 3, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD POST TRAUMATIC ARTHRITIS FROM A PRIOR PILON FRACTURE. THE DISTAL TIBIAL BONE WAS RATHER SOFT AT THE TIME OF SURGERY- THE TALAR COMPONENT COLLAPSED INTO SOME VALGUS. THE PATIENT HAD A TIBIAL PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE THAT REQUIRED SURGERY. THE PATIENT CONTINUES TO HAVE DISCOMFORT. THE PHYSICIAN IS PLANNING TO REVISE THE PATIENT WITH LONGER TIBIAL STEM FOR ADDED STABILITY. THE PHYSICIAN PLANS TO HAVE A NAIL BACK UP IN CASE THE BONE IS TOO SOFT AND UNABLE TO REVISE. DURING A LATER CONVERSATION THE PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT COMPONENTS WERE NOT THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE, IT WAS THE PATIENT'S POOR QUALITY OF BONE. THEY PLAN ON REVISING IN THE NEAR FUTURE BUT THE PATIENT IS CURRENTLY HAVING CARDIAC ISSUES AND HAS NOT BEEN CLEARED BY CARDIOLOGY.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Discomfort; Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 18069708 ↗InjuryAug 18, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A TOTAL ANKLE REPLACEMENT. THE PATIENT HAD AN INFECTION, THE TOTAL ANKLE WAS EXPLANTED AND A CEMENT SPACER WAS INSERTED. THE PATIENT WAS WASHED OUT AND A POLY EXCHANGE WAS DONE ALONG WITH ANTIBIOTICS.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 17575421 ↗MalfunctionJan 6, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
DURING A REVISION TAR INTERVENTION THERE WAS A DISASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE TIBIAL TRAY AND THE BASE STEM PIECE WHILE TRIALING FOR THE PE INSERT THICKNESS. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE WAS FOLLOWED AS DESCRIBED, MORSE TAPER LOCKING BETWEEN THE 2 COMPONENTS WAS TESTED AS DESCRIBED IN TECHNIQUE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13181786 ↗
Other PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER devices
- Vantage 350-22-03Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Ankle, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer2 recalls2 reports
- Vantage 350-21-04Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Ankle, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer2 recalls0 reports
- INFINITY 33630023Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER60 reports
- INFINITY 33600020Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER1 recall9 reports
- Vantage 350-22-02Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Ankle, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer1 recall5 reports
- INFINITY 33650003Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER55 reports
- INFINITY 33630022Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER54 reports
- INFINITY 33600030Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER1 recall4 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page