Skip to content

INBONE 220223210ERecalls & reported problems

Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of INBONE (56)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00840420125019), received between Jul 12, 2024 and Jul 12, 2024 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Deformation” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 2 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Deformation2

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJul 12, 2024Material Deformation; Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN INSERTING THE POLY AT THE END OF THE CASE, THE POLY GOT DAMAGED UPON INSERTION. WE HAD A SECOND POLY TO INSERT AND IT TOO HAD A SMALL DAMAGED WHEN INSERTING ON THE LATTER SIDE BUT THE SURGEONS WAS OK TO USE IT. A SURGICAL DELAY OF APPROXIMATELY 15 MINUTES WAS ENCOUNTERED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19735691 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 12, 2024Material Deformation; Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN INSERTING THE POLY AT THE END OF THE CASE, THE POLY GOT DAMAGED UPON INSERTION. WE HAD A SECOND POLY TO INSERT AND IT TOO HAD A SMALL DAMAGED WHEN INSERTING ON THE LATTER SIDE BUT THE SURGEONS WAS OK TO USE IT. A SURGICAL DELAY OF APPROXIMATELY 15 MINUTES WAS ENCOUNTERED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19735690 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page