Skip to content

Midmark IQecg® Digital ECG 1-100-1330Recalls & reported problems

Midmark Corporation · The IQecg® from Midmark is an easy-to-use, digital, 12-lead resting ECG solution that helps you quickly administer testing and access patient test results you need to make informed cardiac assessments and provide more efficient patient care. · Class 2

All models of Midmark IQecg Digital ECG (4)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00841709100581), received between Oct 27, 2020 and Oct 27, 2020 — classified as 1 injury.

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Jul 20, 2026Class IIOpen, Classified

    A communication anomoly may result in incorrect electrocardiogram waveforms of a patient and an inaccurate beats-per-minute calculation.

    Z-3012-2026 · Root cause: Software design · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • Stroke/CVA1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 27, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A MISDIAGNOSIS OCCURRED DUE TO A WANDERING BASELINE AND A P-WAVE THAT WAS MISSING FROM THE ECG REPORT. THE PATIENT SUFFERED A STROKE. THE CUSTOMER WAS CONTACTED AND THE. CAR FILE WAS SENT. THE FILE WAS ANALYZED BY THE PRINCIPLE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEER AT MIDMARK. THE FILE WAS REVIEWED, AND THE PATIENT HAD ANTERIOR MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION WHICH THE SOFTWARE HAD DETECTED. MIDMARK'S PHYSICIAN'S GUIDE STATES: WHEN THE EVIDENCE OF ABNORMALITY IS ON THE BORDERLINE WITH SIGNAL ARTIFACTS, HUMAN INTELLIGENCE IS NEEDED. THE COMPUTER ANALYSIS RESULT IS JUST A SECOND OPINION FOR THE PHYSICIANS, IT IS NOT A REPLACEMENT OF A TRAINED PROFESSIONALS READING AND JUDGEMENT. MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS WERE MADE BY MIDMARK TO CONTACT THE CUSTOMER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Stroke/CVA

    MAUDE report 10741824 ↗

Other Electrocardiograph devices

All Electrocardiograph devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page