Thromborel® S 10446442Recalls & reported problems
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products GmbH · Determination of prothrombin time (PT) and of the activity of coagulation factors II, V, VII and X · Class 2
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00842768011306), received between Aug 24, 2020 and Aug 24, 2020 — classified as 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings4
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient4
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 24, 2020Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings
A DISCORDANT, FALSELY ELEVATED PROTHROMBIN TIME (PT) AND PROTHROMBIN TIME INTERNATIONAL NORMALIZED RATIO (INR) RESULT, AS WELL AS A DISCORDANT, FALSELY LOW PROTHROMBIN TIME PERCENT (PT%) RESULT WERE OBTAINED ON A PATIENT SAMPLE ON A SYSMEX CA-660 SYSTEM USING THROMBOREL S REAGENT. PRIOR TO OBTAINING THE DISCORDANT RESULTS, THE SAMPLE WAS RUN FOR PT, INR, AND PT%, BUT THE SYSTEM DID NOT YIELD NUMERIC RESULTS AND GENERATED AN ERROR MESSAGE. AFTER THE INITIAL DISCORDANT RESULTS WERE OBTAINED, THE SAME SAMPLE WAS REPEATED FOR PT, INR, AND PT% USING THE SAME SYSTEM AND REAGENT. THE PT AND INR RECOVERED LOWER AND THE PT% RECOVERED HIGHER. THE SAME SAMPLE WAS THEN REPEATED AGAIN FOR PT, INR, AND PT% USING THE SAME SYSTEM AND REAGENT. THE PT AND INR RECOVERED LOWER AND THE PT% RECOVERED HIGHER. THESE FINAL PT, INR, AND PT% RESULTS WERE REPORTED, AS THE CORRECT RESULTS, TO THE PHYSICIAN(S). A DISCORDANT, FALSELY ELEVATED PROTHROMBIN TIME (PT) AND PROTHROMBIN TIME INTERNATIONAL NORMALIZED RATIO (INR) RESULT, AS WELL AS A DISCORDANT, FALSELY LOW PROTHROMBIN TIME PERCENT (PT%) RESULT WERE ALSO OBTAINED ON ANOTHER PATIENT SAMPLE FROM A DIFFERENT PATIENT ON THE SAME DAY ON A SYSMEX CA-660 SYSTEM
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10442778 ↗MalfunctionAug 24, 2020Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings
A DISCORDANT, FALSELY ELEVATED PROTHROMBIN TIME (PT) AND PROTHROMBIN TIME INTERNATIONAL NORMALIZED RATIO (INR) RESULT, AS WELL AS A DISCORDANT, FALSELY LOW PROTHROMBIN TIME PERCENT (PT%) RESULT WERE OBTAINED ON A PATIENT SAMPLE ON A SYSMEX CA-660 SYSTEM USING THROMBOREL S REAGENT. THE SAME SAMPLE WAS REPEATED FOR PT, INR, AND PT% USING THE SAME SYSTEM AND REAGENT. THE PT AND INR RECOVERED LOWER AND THE PT% RECOVERED HIGHER. THE REPEAT PT, INR, AND PT% RESULTS WERE REPORTED, AS THE CORRECT RESULTS, TO THE PHYSICIAN(S). THE SAME PATIENT SAMPLE WAS THEN RUN FOR PT, INR, AND PT% IN AN ALTERNATE TUBE ON THE SYSMEX CA-660 SYSTEM USING THROMBOREL S REAGENT, BUT THE SYSTEM DID NOT YIELD NUMERIC RESULTS AND GENERATED AN ERROR MESSAGE. THE SAME SAMPLE WAS THEN REPEATED FOR PT, INR, AND PT% USING THE SAME SYSTEM AND REAGENT. THE PT AND INR RECOVERED HIGHER AND THE PT% RECOVERED LOWER. THESE RESULTS WERE NOT REPORTED TO THE PHYSICIAN(S). THE FOLLOWING DAY, A NEW SAMPLE FROM THE SAME PATIENT WAS RUN FOR INR, RECOVERING LOWER THAN THE INR RESULTS FROM THE PREVIOUS DAY. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THIS RESULT WAS REPORTED TO THE PHYSICIAN(S). THERE ARE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT INTERVENTION OR ADVERSE HEALTH CO
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10442774 ↗MalfunctionAug 24, 2020Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings
A DISCORDANT, FALSELY ELEVATED PROTHROMBIN TIME (PT) AND PROTHROMBIN TIME INTERNATIONAL NORMALIZED RATIO (INR) RESULT, AS WELL AS A DISCORDANT, FALSELY LOW PROTHROMBIN TIME PERCENT (PT%) RESULT WERE OBTAINED ON A PATIENT SAMPLE ON A SYSMEX CA-660 SYSTEM USING THROMBOREL S REAGENT. THE SAME SAMPLE WAS REPEATED FOR PT, INR, AND PT% USING THE SAME SYSTEM AND REAGENT. THE PT AND INR RECOVERED LOWER AND THE PT% RECOVERED HIGHER. THE REPEAT PT, INR, AND PT% RESULTS WERE REPORTED, AS THE CORRECT RESULTS, TO THE PHYSICIAN(S). THE SAME PATIENT SAMPLE WAS THEN RUN FOR PT, INR, AND PT% IN AN ALTERNATE TUBE ON THE SYSMEX CA-660 SYSTEM USING THROMBOREL S REAGENT, BUT THE SYSTEM DID NOT YIELD NUMERIC RESULTS AND GENERATED AN ERROR MESSAGE. THE SAME SAMPLE WAS THEN REPEATED FOR PT, INR, AND PT% USING THE SAME SYSTEM AND REAGENT. THE PT AND INR RECOVERED HIGHER AND THE PT% RECOVERED LOWER. THESE RESULTS WERE NOT REPORTED TO THE PHYSICIAN(S). THE FOLLOWING DAY, A NEW SAMPLE FROM THE SAME PATIENT WAS RUN FOR INR, RECOVERING LOWER THAN THE INR RESULTS FROM THE PREVIOUS DAY. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THIS RESULT WAS REPORTED TO THE PHYSICIAN(S). THERE ARE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT INTERVENTION OR ADVERSE HEALTH CO
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10442773 ↗MalfunctionAug 24, 2020Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings
A DISCORDANT, FALSELY ELEVATED PROTHROMBIN TIME (PT) AND PROTHROMBIN TIME INTERNATIONAL NORMALIZED RATIO (INR) RESULT, AS WELL AS A DISCORDANT, FALSELY LOW PROTHROMBIN TIME PERCENT (PT%) RESULT WERE OBTAINED ON A PATIENT SAMPLE ON A SYSMEX CA-660 SYSTEM USING THROMBOREL S REAGENT. PRIOR TO OBTAINING THE DISCORDANT RESULTS, THE SAMPLE WAS RUN FOR PT, INR, AND PT%, BUT THE SYSTEM DID NOT YIELD NUMERIC RESULTS AND GENERATED AN ERROR MESSAGE. AFTER THE INITIAL DISCORDANT RESULTS WERE OBTAINED, THE SAME SAMPLE WAS REPEATED FOR PT, INR, AND PT% USING THE SAME SYSTEM AND REAGENT. THE PT AND INR RECOVERED LOWER AND THE PT% RECOVERED HIGHER. THE SAME SAMPLE WAS THEN REPEATED AGAIN FOR PT, INR, AND PT% USING THE SAME SYSTEM AND REAGENT. THE PT AND INR RECOVERED LOWER AND THE PT% RECOVERED HIGHER. THESE FINAL PT, INR, AND PT% RESULTS WERE REPORTED, AS THE CORRECT RESULTS, TO THE PHYSICIAN(S). A DISCORDANT, FALSELY LOW PROTHROMBIN TIME (PT) AND PROTHROMBIN TIME INTERNATIONAL NORMALIZED RATIO (INR) RESULT, AS WELL AS A DISCORDANT, FALSELY ELEVATED PROTHROMBIN TIME PERCENT (PT%) RESULT WERE THEN OBTAINED WHEN RUNNING THE SAME PATIENT SAMPLE IN AN ALTERNATE TUBE ON THE SYSMEX CA-660 SYSTEM USING
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10442770 ↗
Other TEST, TIME, PROTHROMBIN devices
- COAGUCHEK XS PT TEST 6 STRIP 4625374160Roche Diagnostics GmbH · TEST, TIME, PROTHROMBIN3 deaths1,681 reports
- CoaguChek XS PT strips 4625315160Roche Diagnostics GmbH · TEST, TIME, PROTHROMBIN604 reports
- CoaguChek XS Patient Self Testing Care Kit 03666794001Roche Diagnostics GmbH · Test, Time, Prothrombin212 reports
- CoaguChek XS Patient Self Testing Care Kit 4837738001Roche Diagnostics GmbH · TEST, TIME, PROTHROMBIN134 reports
- i-STAT 03P89-24Abbott Point Of Care Inc. · TEST, TIME, PROTHROMBIN127 reports
- HemosIL ReadiPlasTin (20 mL) 00020301400Instrumentation Laboratory Company · TEST, TIME, PROTHROMBIN2 recalls2 reports
- Coag-Sense Test Strip Kit, 50 ct. 100218Coagusense Inc. · Test, Time, Prothrombin1 recall0 reports
- STA® - Néoplastine® CI Plus 10 00667Diagnostica Stago · TEST, TIME, PROTHROMBIN1 recall0 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.