Skip to content

CERTAIN® BELLATEK® ENCODE® IEEHA563Recalls & reported problems

ZimVie US Corp LLC · CERTAIN® BELLATEK® ENCODE® EMERGENCE HEALING ABUTMENT 5MM(D) 6MM(P) 3MM(H) · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00844868045601), received between Sep 3, 2024 and May 5, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture1
  • Positioning Failure1
  • Unintended Movement1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 5, 2026Unintended Movement

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT CAME IN FOR FOLLOW UP AND THE ABUTMENT/SCREW HAD LOOSENED ON A PREVIOUSLY RESTORED IMPLANT. CLINICAL EVIDENCE SHOWS NO EVIDENCE OF FRACTURE OF THE IMPLANT OR ABUTMENT. TOOTH SITE #28.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25086639 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 20, 2025Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure

    NO FURTHER EVENT INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23334895 ↗
  • InjurySep 3, 2024Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT AT TOOTH SITE #UNKNOWN WAS REMOVED DUE TO A FRACTURED SCREW. THE REFERRING DENTIST OVER-TORQUED AND FRACTURED THE SCREW. THE FRACTURED SCREW FRAGMENT WAS UNABLE TO BE REMOVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20125723 ↗

Other Abutment, Implant, Dental, Endosseous devices

All Abutment, Implant, Dental, Endosseous devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page