Tornier Perform MWH742Recalls & reported problems
Tornier, Inc. · KEELED PUNCH · Class 1
All models of Tornier Perform (40)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00846832071630), received between Apr 21, 2025 and Apr 21, 2025 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break1
- Degraded1
- Fracture1
Patient problems
- Insufficient Information1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 21, 2025Break; Degraded; Fracture; Break; Degraded; Fracture
DURING PRIMARY LEFT ANATOMIC SHOULDER REPLACEMENT, SURGEON WAS PREPARING THE GLENOID SURFACE TO RECEIVE A PERFORM + LEFT SMALL 15DEG POLY IMPLANT. PROCEDURE HAD PROCEEDED WITHOUT INCIDENT, UNTIL THE STEP TO UTILIZE THE KEELED OSTEOTOME AND PUNCH, WHICH ATTACHES ON TO THE HANDLE IN INSTRUMENTS. THE HANDLE WAS FOUND TO BE BROKEN. THE LOCKING SLEEVE WAS COMPLETELY SEPARATE TO THE MAIN HANDLE SHAFT. ATTEMPTS TO REATTACH THE SLEEVE ONTO THE HANDLE SO THE OSTEOTOME / PUNCH CAN BE LOCKED TO THE HANDLE, PROVED FRUITLESS. IN THE END, THE SURGEON FIRST PLACED THE OSTEOTOME (OVER THE GUIDE WIRE STILL INSITU) INTO THE SEMI-PREPARED "KEEL HOLE", THEN PLACED THE HANDLE ON TO THE END OF THE OSTEOTOME, AND IMPACTED THE OSTEOTOME. WITH THE HANDLE NOT ATTACHED TO THE OSTEOTOME, THE ONLY WAY TO REMOVE THE OSTEOTOME, WAS GRABBING IT WITH A PAIR OF HEAVY PLIERS, AND HITTING THE PLIERS WITH A MALLET TO BACK IT OUT. THIS PROCESS WAS REPEATED FOR THE PUNCH. THE SURGEON WAS HAPPY THAT THE KEEL-HOLE WAS ADEQUATELY PREPARED (THE TRIAL IMPLANT SEATED HOME FULLY WHEN INSERTED INTO THE GLENOID), BUT THE SURGEON WAS CONCERNED ABOUT POSSIBLE DAMAGE TO THE GLENOID SURFACE / VAULT, WHEN USING THE MALLET / PLIERS TO
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 21878329 ↗
Other PUNCH, SURGICAL devices
- SIGMA LCS HIGH PERFORMANCE 9505-02-012Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PUNCH, SURGICAL85 reports
- SIGMA LCS 9505-02-018Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PUNCH, SURGICAL1 recall10 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 801-05-040Encore Medical, L.P. · PUNCH, SURGICAL1 recall7 reports
- SIGMA LCS 9505-02-017Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PUNCH, SURGICAL1 recall1 report
- SIGMA LCS 9505-02-016Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PUNCH, SURGICAL1 recall0 reports
- SIGMA LCS 9505-02-021Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PUNCH, SURGICAL1 recall0 reports
- SIGMA LCS 9505-02-020Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PUNCH, SURGICAL1 recall0 reports
- SIGMA HIGH PERFORMANCE 9505-02-047Depuy (Ireland) · PUNCH, SURGICAL33 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page