Skip to content

M SERIES BIPHASIC 40010511100103010Recalls & reported problems

Zoll Medical Corporation · Defibrillator ,MAIN,BASIC-4, 3/5LEAD,SPO2,NIBP,BIPHASIC,AC,PC,EL,RC,SM,CM,ENG · Class 2

All models of M SERIES BIPHASIC (59)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847946004163), received between Aug 19, 2015 and Oct 17, 2019 — classified as 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Power Up” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Power Up2
  • Energy Output Problem1
  • Failure of Device to Self-Test1
  • Failure to Charge1
  • Use of Incorrect Control/Treatment Settings1

Patient problems

  • No Patient Involvement5
  • No Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 17, 2019Failure to Charge; Failure to Charge

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE FAILED TO CHARGE. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 9203778 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 9, 2018Energy Output Problem; Energy Output Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO TREAT A PATIENT (AGE AND GENDER UNKNOWN), THE DEVICE DID NOT FOLLOW CORRECT CHARGING PROTOCOL. COMPLAINANT DID NOT INDICATE THAT THERE WAS ANY ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 7769018 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 20, 2017Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE FAILED SELF-TEST. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 7045700 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 30, 2017Failure to Power Up; Failure to Power Up

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT THE DEVICE WOULD NOT POWER UP. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 6986872 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 23, 2017Failure to Power Up; Failure to Power Up

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING A BATTERY WAS UNABLE TO BE SEATED IN THE BATTERY WELL TO POWER THE DEVICE ON. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 6586161 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 19, 2015Use of Incorrect Control/Treatment Settings

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE POWERED UP IN THE INCORRECT MODE AND WAS UNABLE TO SWITCH FROM LEADS TO PADS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 5035710 ↗

Other PACEMAKER, CARDIAC, EXTERNAL TRANSCUTANEOUS (NON-INVASIVE) devices

All PACEMAKER, CARDIAC, EXTERNAL TRANSCUTANEOUS (NON-INVASIVE) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page