Skip to content

M SERIES BIPHASIC 60021311100123010Recalls & reported problems

Zoll Medical Corporation · Defibrillator ,MAIN,MNL-1, 12LEAD,ETCO2,SPO2,BIPHASIC,AC,PC,EL,RC,SM,CM,ENG,REFURB · Class 2

All models of M SERIES BIPHASIC (59)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847946014131), received between Aug 18, 2015 and Aug 28, 2019 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem1
  • Failure to Power Up1
  • Image Display Error/Artifact1
  • Self-Activation or Keying1

Patient problems

  • No Patient Involvement3
  • Vitrectomy1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 28, 2019Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem; Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE DISPLAYED A "BRIDGE TEST FAILED" MESSAGE. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 8939554 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 19, 2019Failure to Power Up; Failure to Power Up

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING FUNCTIONAL TESTING, THE DEVICE WOULD NOT POWER UP. COMPLAINANT DID NOT INDICATE THAT THERE WAS ANY PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 8808979 ↗
  • Aug 25, 2015Self-Activation or Keying

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE FAILED SELF TEST. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 5029662 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 18, 2015Image Display Error/Artifact

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE POWERED ON WITHOUT DISPLAY. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: Vitrectomy

    MAUDE report 5025457 ↗

Other PACEMAKER, CARDIAC, EXTERNAL TRANSCUTANEOUS (NON-INVASIVE) devices

All PACEMAKER, CARDIAC, EXTERNAL TRANSCUTANEOUS (NON-INVASIVE) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page