AcQCross Qx 900304Recalls & reported problems
Acutus Medical, Inc. · AcQCross Qx - FC 65cm · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00850027837147), received between Jun 7, 2023 and Nov 21, 2023 — classified as 3 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Advance” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Difficult to Advance1
- Material Deformation1
Patient problems
- Bruise/Contusion1
- Hematoma1
- Insufficient Information1
- Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension1
- Non specific EKG/ECG Changes1
- Perforation1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryNov 21, 2023Difficult to Advance; Difficult to Advance
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A CRYO ABLATION PROCEDURE, RESISTANCE WAS NOTED WHEN ATTEMPTING TO ACCESS THE RIGHT FEMORAL VEIN. THE ROOM STAFF WERE INSTRUCTED ON PROPER PREP AND USE OF THE FLEXCATH CROSS SYSTEM. THE PHYSICIAN WAS INSTRUCTED ON PROPER PREP, BEST PRACTICES AND RISK MITIGATION WHEN USING THE FLEXCATH CROSS SYSTEM. WHEN ATTEMPTING TO ACCESS THE RIGHT FEMORAL VEIN WITH THE FLEXCATH CROSS SYSTEM, RESISTANCE WAS MET, AND THE PHYSICIAN CONTINUED TO PUSH FORCE AGAINST THE RESISTANCE. THE PHYSICIAN WAS INSTRUCTED TO STOP, REASSESS, AND DILATE THE ACCESS SITE IF NEEDED. THE PHYSICIAN NOTED A KINK ON THE GUIDEWIRE WAS PRESENT WHEN THE FLEXCATH CROSS SYSTEM WAS PULLED OUT. THE GUIDEWIRE WAS REPLACED WITH A NON-MEDTRONIC GUIDEWIRE WHICH RESOLVED THE ISSUE. THE PHYSICIAN DILATED THE ACCESS SITE AND REINSERTED THE FLEXCATH CROSS WITHOUT ANY FURTHER ISSUES. TRANSSEPTAL WAS ACHIEVED AND PROCEDURE COMPLETED. A LATER COMMUNICATION WAS RECEIVED FROM THE HOSPITAL STATING THAT THE PATIENT HAD GROIN COMPLICATIONS REQUIRING SURGERY. THE PHYSICIAN WAS AWARE THAT THE PRODUCT WAS NOT A DIRECT CAUSE OF THE ISSUE. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 18187353 ↗InjuryAug 28, 2023Material Deformation; Material Deformation
IT WAS INITIALLY REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE GUIDEWIRE EXPERIENCED A KINK, LEADING TO A SUBSEQUENT KINK IN THE SHEATH. PER THE PHYSICIAN, THIS SERIES OF EVENTS RESULTED IN A PERFORATION OCCURRING IN THE RIGHT COMMON FEMORAL VEIN, WHICH IN TURN CAUSED BLEEDING FROM THE PATIENT'S RIGHT GROIN. PER FOLLOW-UP, IT WAS NOTED THAT THERE WERE NO COMPLICATIONS REGARDING ACCESS, WHICH WAS GUIDED BY ULTRASOUND. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT REPORTEDLY COUGHED LEADING TO THE DISCOVERY OF A HEMATOMA IN THE RIGHT GROIN. FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURE, TECHNICIANS APPLIED MANUAL PRESSURE FOR A DURATION OF 30 MINUTES IN AN ATTEMPT TO MANAGE THE BLEEDING. A VASCULAR SURGEON WAS CALLED TO ASSIST WHO ADDRESSED THE ACTIVE BLEEDING BY UTILIZING SUTURES. MULTIPLE ACCESS POINTS WERE CREATED IN THE RIGHT FEMORAL VEIN TO EFFECTIVELY HALT THE BLEEDING. AFTER THE PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT WAS PUT ON BED REST FOR FOUR HOURS AND KEPT OVERNIGHT IN THE HOSPITAL TO BE MONITORED. A FOLLOW-UP ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION CONDUCTED ON THE SUBSEQUENT DAY REVEALED THE ABSENCE OF A HEMATOMA OR PSEUDOANEURYSM, THOUGH SOME BRUISING WAS OBSERVED. THE PATIENT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY DISCHARGED FROM THE CLINIC.
Patient problems: Bruise/Contusion; Hematoma; Perforation
MAUDE report 17638588 ↗InjuryJun 7, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AS THE PHYSICIAN REMOVED THE WIRE AND DILATOR, AND WAS GETTING THE SIDE PORT FLUSH CONNECTED, THE PATIENT DESATURATED INTO THE LOW 90S/HIGH 80S AND BECAME HYPOTENSIVE IN THE 90S/60S. REPORTEDLY, THE FLEXCATH AND ACQCROSS WERE ADVANCED TO THE ATRIAL SEPTUM. THE PHYSICIAN TENTED THE SEPTUM, EXTENDED THE ACQCROSS NEEDLE, ADVANCED THE WIRE INTO THE LSPV (LEFT SUPERIOR PULMONARY VEIN), AND RETRACED THE NEEDLE. THEN THE PHYSICIAN ADVANCED THE FLEXCATH AND ACQCROSS TRANSEPTAL INTO THE LEFT ATRIUM, REMOVED THE WIRE AND DILATOR, AND HOOKED UP THE FLEXCATH SIDE PORT TO A HEPARIN FLUSH LINE. AT THE SAME TIME, THE PATIENT'S OXYGEN SATURATIONS DECREASED, AND THE PATIENT BECAME HYPOTENSIVE. THE PHYSICIAN LOOKED ON FLUOROSCOPY FOR PERICARDIAL EFFUSION AND DID NOT SEE ANY AIR MOVING IN THE PATIENT'S THORAX AND LOOKED AGAIN ON INTRACARDIAC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY(ICE) AND DID NOT SEE ANY EFFUSION. THE ANESTHETIST THEN GAVE A VASOPRESSOR TO ADDRESS THE PATIENT BECOMING HYPOTENSIVE AND THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE PROCEDURE AND BEGAN PREPPING THE CRYOBALLON. THEN THE PATIENT BEGAN HAVING ST SEGMENT ELEVATION THAT LASTED APPROXIMATELY A MINUTE. THE PHYSICIAN THEN CHECKE
Patient problems: Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension; Non specific EKG/ECG Changes
MAUDE report 17081408 ↗
Other Introducer, Catheter devices
- VIZIGO D138502Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER2 recalls4 deaths2,839 reports
- VIZIGO D138501Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER2 recalls2 deaths2,005 reports
- Swartz™ 407451St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER5 deaths728 reports
- Edwards eSheath+ Introducer set 914ESPEdwards Lifesciences LLC · Introducer, Catheter22 deaths532 reports
- Fast-Cath™ 406849St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER420 reports
- VIZIGO D138503Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER362 reports
- Agilis™ G408318St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER333 reports
- Agilis™ NxT Steerable Introducer Dual-Reach™ SI-1371-MSt. Jude Medical, Inc. · Introducer, catheter1 death301 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page