Skip to content

Visual-ICE® Cryoablation System FPRCH6000-02Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Cryoablation System · Class 2

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00859019006462), received between Dec 2, 2022 and May 27, 2025 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Cooling” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 2 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Cooling4
  • Temperature Problem2
  • Display or Visual Feedback Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 27, 2025Insufficient Cooling; Insufficient Cooling

    IT WAS REPORTED INSUFFICIENT ICE OCCURRED. A VISUAL-ICE CRYOABLATION SYSTEM WAS CHOSEN TO COMPLETE A RENAL TUMOR CRYOABLATION. THE PHYSICIAN AND ANOTHER PHYSICIAN NOTED THE ICE FORMATION WAS LESS THAN EXPECTED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE PHYSICIAN BELIEVED THE TREATMENT WAS ADEQUATE EVEN THOUGH THE ICE FORMATION WAS LESS THAN EXPECTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22090573 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 24, 2025Insufficient Cooling; Display or Visual Feedback Problem; Temperature Problem; Insufficient Cooling; Display or Visual Feedback Problem; Temperature Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT INSUFFICIENT ICE OCCURRED. A VISUAL-ICE CRYOABLATION SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR A CRYOABLATION PROCEDURE. DURING THE SECOND FREEZE OF THE PROCEDURE, THE CONSOLE DID NOT FREEZE AS EXPECTED AND INSUFFICIENT ICE OCCURRED. IT WAS NOTED THAT THIS ISSUE HAS OCCURRED WITH THE SAME SYSTEM ON MORE THAN ONE OCCASION. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21679785 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 13, 2025Insufficient Cooling; Temperature Problem; Insufficient Cooling; Temperature Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT INSUFFICIENT ICE OCCURRED. A VISUAL-ICE CRYOABLATION SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR A CRYOABLATION PROCEDURE TO TREAT A RENAL TUMOR. DURING THE SECOND FREEZE, HOWEVER, THE CONSOLE DID NOT FREEZE PROPERLY. THE CASE WAS NOT ABLE TO BE COMPLETED, AND THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21595800 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 2, 2022Insufficient Cooling; Insufficient Cooling

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SYSTEM WAS PRODUCING INSUFFICIENT ICE. THE VISUAL-ICE CRYOABLATION SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR A CRYOABLATION PROCEDURE TO TREAT A RENAL TUMOR. DURING TESTING, HOWEVER, THE SYSTEM WAS PRODUCING INSUFFICIENT ICE. THE FIRST PROBE WAS TESTED, AND NO ICE BALL WAS FORMED IN THE SALINE. A SECOND PROBE OF THE SAME LOT NUMBER WAS INSERTED INTO A DIFFERENT CHANNEL AND TESTED, AND THE SAME ISSUE OF NO ICE BALL FORMATION OCCURRED. A THIRD PROBE FROM A DIFFERENT LOT WAS TESTED AND THE SAME ISSUE OF NO ICE BALL FORMATION OCCURRED. THE SYSTEM WAS SHUT DOWN, THE ARGON GAS TANKS WERE DISCONNECTED AND RECONNECTED, AND THE SEAL ON THE TANKS AND THE MACHINE WERE CHECKED AGAIN. THE SYSTEM WAS TURNED BACK ON AND THE SECOND AND THIRD PROBES WERE RECONNECTED. WHEN INSERTING THE PROBES, THERE WAS RESISTANCE, BUT THEY WERE ABLE TO BE INSERTED AND TESTED AGAIN. HOWEVER, NO ICE BALL HAD FORMED AGAIN. THE RADIOLOGIST NOTED THAT THE PROBES FELT HOT DURING THE LAST TEST. THE CRYOABLATION SYSTEM WAS NOT USED FOR THE PROCEDURE, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED. THE DEFECTIVE NEEDLES WERE TESTED AGAIN WITH THE SAME VISUAL

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15905690 ↗

Other Unit, Cryosurgical, Accessories devices

All Unit, Cryosurgical, Accessories devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page