Cubby Beds KIT10001Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 30 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00860007550263), received between Oct 21, 2022 and Jul 21, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 29 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (25 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 30 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• MalfunctionJul 21, 2026Break

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 25894798 ↗
• MalfunctionJul 21, 2026Break; Material Separation; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  Patient problems: Abrasion

  MAUDE report 25892514 ↗
• MalfunctionJul 17, 2026Break

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 25856155 ↗
• MalfunctionJun 22, 2026Break; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  THE PARENT REPORTED THAT HER CHILD BROKE THE HOUSING OF THE TECHNOLOGY HUB AND WAS ABLE TO ELOPE FROM THE BED. SHE STATED THAT HER CHILD DAMAGED AND BROKE THE SCREWS ON THE HOUSING THAT HOLDS THE CAMERA AND SHE BELIEVES THAT'S HOW THE CHILD WAS ABLE TO GET OUT. IN ADDITION, SHE REPORTED THAT THE ZIPPER ON THE DOOR BECAME DAMAGED AND PREVENTED THE DOOR FROM BEING ZIPPED CLOSED. THE PARENT ALSO CONFIRMED THAT THEY WERE ABLE TO FIX THE DOOR ZIPPER THAT WAS STUCK AND THE ZIPPER IS FUNCTIONING PROPERLY. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 25587334 ↗
• MalfunctionJun 18, 2026Break; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  PER PARENT, THE CHILD REMOVED THE THUMBSCREWS FROM THE TECHNOLOGY HUB AND PUSHED IT OUT FROM THE BED AND ELOPED THROUGH THE OPENING. THE PARENT ALSO REPORTED THAT ONE OF THE SCREWS BROKE, AND THE SCREW BROKE THE PLASTIC HOUSING. THE PARENT STATED SHE DID NOT HAVE THE CLOTH COVER TO INSTALL OVER THE TECHNOLOGY HUB PORTAL OPENING. FOUR (4) PICTURES WERE PROVIDED BY THE PARENT. 1) PHOTO SHOWS THE FRONT OF THE GRAY HOUSING WITH THE TOP CENTER SCREW HOLE COMPLETELY PUNCHED THROUGH. 2) PHOTO SHOWS A CLOSE-UP VIEW OF THE TOP CENTER SCREW LOCATION. 3) PHOTO OF THE TECHNOLOGY HUB PORTAL AREA THAT HAS THE BLACK ZIPPER RING ZIPPED TO THE PORTAL AREA. 4) PHOTO SHOWS THE TECHNOLOGY HUB REMOVED FROM THE BED, AND ALL THE THUMBSCREWS ARE REMOVED, AND IT APPEARS THAT AT LEAST ONE OF THE SCREWS IS PLACED NEXT TO THE HOUSING. THE PHOTOS CONFIRM THE THUMBSCREWS WERE REMOVED FROM THE TECHNOLOGY HUB, AND THAT THE TOP CENTER SCREW LOCATION HAS DAMAGE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 25549504 ↗
• MalfunctionMay 29, 2026Break; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  THE DURABLE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT (DME) REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT THEIR CLIENT DAMAGED THE TECHNOLOGY HUB AND ELOPED FROM THE BED THROUGH THE OPENING. THE REPRESENTATIVE STATED THAT THE CHILD TOOK OUT THE CASING, THE CAMERA AND THE LIGHT AND EXITED THE BED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 25339356 ↗
• MalfunctionMay 13, 2026Break

  THE PARENT REPORTED THAT HER SON DAMAGED THE HOUSING OF THE TECHNOLOGY HUB, CAUSING IT TO CRACK AND SEPARATE, AND ELOPED FROM THE BED THROUGH THE PORTAL AREA. THE PARENT EXPLAINED THAT SHE IS UNAWARE OF HOW HER CHILD WAS ABLE TO BREAK THE TECHNOLOGY HUB HOUSING. SHE CONFIRMED THAT THE PADLOCK WAS INSTALLED ON THE TECHNOLOGY HUB AT THE TIME OF THE REPORTED EVENT. THE PARENT PROVIDED ONE PHOTO OF THE DAMAGED TECHNOLOGY HUB. THE PHOTO CONFIRMS THE HOUSING IS CRACKED, AND A PIECE OF THE HOUSING IS BROKE OFF FROM THE DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 25164949 ↗
• MalfunctionApr 23, 2026Break

  THE COMPLAINT WAS REPORTED TO SENSORY MEDICAL BY A DURABLE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT (DME) REPRESENTATIVE. THE REPRESENTATIVE PROVIDED THE CONTACT INFORMATION OF THE PARENT OF THE CHILD. PER PARENT, THE CHILD WOKE UP IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT AND BROKE THE OUTER COVER OF THE TECH HUB AND THEN CHEWED THROUGH THE CORD FOR THE HUB. PER PARENT, SHE DOES NOT BELIEVE THE CHILD SWALLOWED ANY PIECES. PER PARENT, THE CHILD REMOVED THE SCREWS FROM THE HUB AFTER THE DAMAGE OCCURRED AND THEN ELOPED THROUGH THE TECH HUB PORTAL. PER PARENT, THEY HAVE DISCONTINUED USE OF THE TECH HUB. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 24974359 ↗
• MalfunctionApr 23, 2026Break

  THE DME REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT THE CLIENT WAS ABLE TO ELOPE FROM THE BED, AND THAT THE TECHNOLOGY HUB WAS BROKE AND PINCHED THE CHILD'S HAND.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 24968795 ↗
• MalfunctionApr 21, 2026Break

  THE COMPLAINT WAS REPORTED TO SENSORY MEDICAL BY A DURABLE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT (DME) REPRESENTATIVE. PER THE REPRESENTATIVE, THE CHILD BROKE THE TECH HUB CASING, AND ELOPED THROUGH THE TECH HUB PORTAL WINDOW. PER REPRESENTATIVE, THE EVENT CAUSED NO MEDICAL INJURY, THE CHILD ONLY SCRATCHED HIS LEG. PER REPRESENTATIVE, THIS IS THE ONLY INFORMATION THEY WERE ABLE TO GET FROM THE PARENT OF THE CHILD. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.

  Patient problems: Abrasion

  MAUDE report 24946646 ↗
• MalfunctionMar 24, 2026Break

  PER PARENT, HER CHILD BROKE THE TECH HUB CASING, AND ELOPED THROUGH THE TECH HUB PORTAL WINDOW. PER PARENT, THERE WERE NO SIGNS OF DAMAGE BEFORE THE ELOPEMENT EVENT. PER PARENT, THEY HAVE DISCONTINUED USE OF THE TECH HUB AND HAVE INSTALLED THE PROVIDED CLOTH COVER INSERT. ONE PHOTO OF THE TECH HUB WAS PROVIDED BY THE PARENT. THE PHOTO SHOWS THE TECH HUB HOUSING BROKEN IN TWO LOCATIONS, BOTH NEAR SCREW POINTS. THE TOP SCREW JUNCTION SHOWS DAMAGE AS WELL. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 24677201 ↗
• MalfunctionMar 5, 2026Break; Material Separation

  PER PARENT, HER SON KICKED THE TECH HUB REPEATEDLY LEADING TO THE SCREWS BREAKING. PER THE PARENT, HER SON WAS ABLE TO GET OUT OF THE CUBBY BED EVEN WHEN THE TECH HUB WAS ZIPPED INTO THE CANOPY AND LOCKED. PER PARENT, THE CHILD RECEIVED SMALL CUTS ON THEIR FEET THAT DID NOT REQUIRE MEDICAL ATTENTION. THE PARENT PROVIDED FOUR (4) PHOTOS THAT APPEAR TO CONFIRM THE DAMAGE TO THE TECH HUB. TWO (2) OF THE PHOTOS SHOW A DISASSEMBLED TECH HUB THAT WAS STILL ZIPPED IN. THERE IS EVIDENT DAMAGE AROUND THE SCREW JUNCTIONS, LEADING TO THE DISASSEMBLY. THE OTHER TWO (2) PHOTOS SHOW DAMAGE TO THE CAMERA CORD.

  Patient problems: Abrasion

  MAUDE report 24523987 ↗
• MalfunctionJan 28, 2026Break; Material Separation

  THE COMPLAINT WAS REPORTED TO SENSORY MEDICAL BY A DURABLE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT (DME) REPRESENTATIVE. PER THE REPRESENTATIVE, THE CHILD IS KICKING OUT THE CAMERA AND GETTING OUT THROUGH THE TECH HUB PORTAL. A PICTURE PROVIDED SHOWS THE BLACK ZIPPER OF THE TECH HUB STILL ATTACHED TO THE CANOPY, WITH NO TECH HUB PRESENT. PER THE REPRESENTATIVE, THERE WERE NO SCREWS MISSING AT THE TIME OF THE EVENT, AND THE FAMILY HAS LOST THEIR TECH HUB CLOTH COVER. THE REPRESENTATIVE STATED THAT THE FAMILY HAS CONTINUED USE OF THE TECH HUB BY PLACING IT IN THE BED WITH THE CHILD, NOT ZIPPED IN. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 24205426 ↗
• MalfunctionJan 28, 2026Material Separation

  PER PARENT, THE CHILD IS ABLE TO PUSH THE TECHNOLOGY HUB OUT OF ITS ZIPPER AND CLIMB THROUGH THE HOLE. PARENT STATED THAT WHILE THE TECH HUB IS LOCKED, THE CHILD PEELS THE ZIPPER OF THE TECH HUB FROM THE INSIDE. THE PARENT MENTIONED HAVING DIFFICULTIES WITH THE INSTALLATION OF THE TECH HUB ZIPPER SINCE IT WAS RECEIVED. PER PARENT, THIS EVENT HAS HAPPENED TWICE. THE PARENT BELIEVES NO DAMAGE HAS BEEN INFLICTED UPON THE TECH HUB OR THE ZIPPER TEETH BY THE CHILD AND THE TECH HUB IS STILL ABLE TO BE ZIPPED IN. THE PARENT NEVER RECEIVED THE CLOTH COVER PIECE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 24201240 ↗
• MalfunctionDec 15, 2025Break; Material Separation; Break; Material Separation

  THE PARENT DESCRIBED THE EVENT AS HER SON APPLYING EXCESSIVE FORCE TO THE TECH HUB FROM THE INSIDE AND KICKING OUT THE SCREWS. ONCE THE SCREWS WERE REMOVED, THE CHILD WAS ABLE TO LOOSEN THE TECH HUB AND PUSH IT OUT OF THE CANOPY. THE PARENT CONFIRMED THAT THE CHILD WAS ABLE TO ELOPE THROUGH THE TECH HUB PORTAL HOLE AS A RESULT OF THE DAMAGE TO THE TECH HUB. THE SCREWS AND PLASTIC ARE BENT AND THEY ARE UNABLE TO PUT THE PRODUCT BACK TOGETHER. THE PARENT MISPLACED THEIR TECH HUB CLOTH COVER, LEAVING A HOLE THAT THE CHILD CAN CLIMB OUT OF DURING BEDTIME. THREE PICTURES WERE PROVIDED BY THE COMPLAINANT OF THE DAMAGE. IMAGES SHOW AN EMPTY TECH HUB HOUSING WITH MULTIPLE LOCATIONS OF PLASTIC DEFORMATION. ANOTHER IMAGE SHOWS THE TECH HUB PORTAL WINDOW WITH THE BLACK ZIPPER PIECE INSTALLED AND LOCKED INTO PLACE. NO APPARENT DAMAGE IS VISIBLE TO THE PORTAL ZIPPERS. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 23810334 ↗
• MalfunctionDec 4, 2025Break; Material Separation; Break; Material Separation

  THE PARENT REPORTED THAT HER CHILD WAS ABLE TO ELOPE THROUGH THE TECHNOLOGY HUB PORTAL. THE PARENT REPORTED THAT THE TECHNOLOGY HUB WAS MISSING 2 THUMB SCREWS IN THE HOUSING, WHICH WAS CONFIRMED BY VIEWING A PHOTO PROVIDED BY THE PARENT. THE PARENT STATED THAT SHE DID NOT NOTICE THE MISSING THUMB SCREWS PRIOR TO THE REPORTED EVENT, AND SHE IS UNABLE TO LOCATE THEM. SHE STATED THAT THE SCREWS COULD HAVE COME LOOSE FROM THE CHILD SHAKING THE TECHNOLOGY HUB. SHE REPORTED THAT THE CHILD WAS ABLE TO ELOPE THROUGH THE TECHNOLOGY HUB PORTAL BY PUSHING HIS WAY THROUGH THE TECHNOLOGY HUB DUE TO MISSING SOME OF THE THUMB SCREWS AND THAT THE CHILD SQUEEZED THROUGH THE SEPARATED PLASTIC. THE PHOTO PROVIDED SHOWS THE SAFETY LOCK WAS IN PLACE ON THE TECHNOLOGY HUB ZIPPER. THE PARENT DID NOT REPORT ANY DAMAGE TO THE TECHNOLOGY HUB ZIPPER AT THE TIME OF ELOPEMENT. SUBSEQUENTLY, AFTER THE PARENT HAD INSTALLED THE ORIGINAL CLOTH COVER, AS DIRECTED BY SENSORY MEDICAL, SHE REPORTED THAT THE CHILD CHEWED THE ZIPPER TAB OFF FROM THE OUTSIDE. THE PARENT ALSO REPORTED THAT AFTER THE CHILD ELOPED, HE WAS ABLE TO ACCESS THE CORDS OUTSIDE OF THE TECHNOLOGY HUB AND BROKE THEM. THE CAMERA AND LIGHT CORDS WERE

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 23720887 ↗
• MalfunctionNov 13, 2025Break; Break

  THE COMPLAINT WAS ORIGINALLY REPORTED BY A DURABLE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT (DME) REPRESENTATIVE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE PARENT'S DAUGHTER BENT THE PLASTIC COVERING OF THE TECH HUB, PUSHED THE TECH HUB COMPONENTS THROUGH THE PORTAL AND ELOPED FROM THE BED. THE COMPLAINANT CONFIRMED THE DAUGHTER WAS NOT INJURED. ON OCTOBER 20, 2025 THE COMPLAINANT STATED THE DAMAGE OCCURRED APPROXIMATELY 1.5 WEEKS BEFORE. THE COMPLAINANT STATED NO LOCK WAS IN USE ON THE TECH HUB. THREE PHOTOS OF THE TECH HUB WERE PROVIDED BY THE DME REPRESENTATIVE. TWO PHOTOS SHOW THE DISCONNECTED INTERNAL HOUSING PANEL WITH A TEAR AND A HOLE ON THE BOTTOM RIGHT HAND SIDE. A THIRD PICTURE SHOWS THE EXTERNAL TECH HUB HOUSING PANEL, CAMERA, AND CIRCADIAN LIGHT & SPEAKER HANGING BY THE WIRES ON THE INSIDE OF THE BED. THE TECH HUB ZIPPER PANEL WAS NOT VISIBLE IN ANY OF THE PICTURES. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 23549352 ↗
• MalfunctionOct 28, 2025Break; Electrical /Electronic Property Problem; Material Separation; Break; Electrical /Electronic Property Problem; Material Separation

  PER COMPLAINANT, THE BED WAS RECEIVED SECONDHAND AS A GIFT IN NOVEMBER 2024, BUT IT DID NOT COME WITH A TECH HUB, PORTAL COVER, OR LOCKS. HE PURCHASED A TECH HUB FROM SENSORY MEDICAL ON (B)(6) 2024. REVIEW OF COMMUNICATIONS IN NOVEMBER WITH THE FAMILY INDICATES THAT THE FAMILY PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED A TECH HUB COVER AND LOCKS FROM CUBBY; HOWEVER, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT ANY WERE PROVIDED AT THAT TIME. THE FINAL COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMPLAINANT, DATED ON (B)(6) 2024, NOTED THAT LOCKS AND A PORTAL COVER WERE STILL NEEDED BUT COULD NOT PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF PURCHASE AS REQUIRED BY THE THEN ACTIVE SENSORY MEDICAL WARRANTY. EXAMINATION OF PAST SENSORY MEDICAL RECORDS CONFIRMS THAT NO ORDERS CONTAINING THESE ITEMS WERE ISSUED TO THE COMPLAINANT. COMPLAINANT STATED WHEN HE RECEIVED THE TECH HUB, HE ONLY RECEIVED 3 OF THE 5 SCREWS AND INSTALLED IT WITH TWO SCREWS MISSING. THE COMPLAINANT SHARED HIS SON IS NOW FORCING HIMSELF THROUGH THE TECH HUB PORTAL, IS ESCAPING THE BED AND HAS CAUSED DAMAGE TO THE TECH HUB ZIPPER AND CAMERA. COMPLAINANT SAID HE COULD NOT LOCATE THE THREE SCREWS AND HAD MISPLACED THE CONTROL INSERTS. PER COMPLAINANT, THIS DAMAGE OCCURRED ABOUT A WEEK BEFORE HE CALLED. S

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 23408509 ↗
• MalfunctionJul 8, 2025Break; Material Separation; Break; Material Separation

  THE PARENT REPORTED THAT THE ZIPPER ON THE TECHNOLOGY HUB BECAME PARTIALLY SEPARATED AND HER CHILD GOT HER HEAD STUCK BETWEEN THE CANOPY AND THE TECH HUB ASSEMBLY. THE PARENT REPORTED THAT THEY BROKE THE TECH HUB FRONT HOUSING IN ORDER TO FREE THE CHILD'S HEAD. THERE WERE THREE (3) PHOTOS PROVIDED BY THE PARENT. THE PHOTOS CONFIRM THAT THE TECH HUB ZIPPER WAS PARTIALLY SEPARATED, AND THE FRONT HOUSING PLATE WAS CRACKED AND BROKEN OFF. THE PHOTOS DO NOT SHOW OR CONFIRM IF THERE WAS DAMAGE TO THE TECH HUB ZIPPER. THE PARENT WAS INSTRUCTED TO REMOVE THE TECH HUB AND REPLACE WITH THE CLOTH COVER. THE PARENT REPORTED THAT THERE HAVE BEEN NO FURTHER ISSUES SINCE THE CLOTH COVER WAS INSTALLED. THERE WAS NO SERIOUS INJURY AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.

  Patient problems: Physical Entrapment

  MAUDE report 22440081 ↗
• MalfunctionJun 11, 2025Break; Break

  PER COMPLAINANT, APPROXIMATELY TWO MONTHS AFTER STARTING TO USE A TECH HUB, SHE NOTICED THE CAMERA WAS OFFLINE, WENT TO INVESTIGATE AND FOUND HER CHILD HAD DAMAGED THE TECH HUB AND HAD HIS ARM AND HEAD THROUGH THE OPENING. PER PARENT, SHE DID NOT OBSERVE THAT HER SON WAS HURT BUT STATED THEY COULD NOT LOCATE ONE OF THE SCREWS. PER COMPLAINANT, THE SCREWS WERE INSTALLED SECURELY. THE FAMILY IS PLANNING TO USE THE CLOTH INSERT UNTIL THEIR TECH HUB IS REPLACED. A PICTURE SHOWS AN INCOMPLETE PIECE OF THE INNER HOUSING SITTING ON THE FLOOR, BROKEN AT THE BASE OF THE LARGE HOLE. A PICTURE SHOWS THE CAMERA AND DAMAGED INNER HOUSING PANEL ON THE FLOOR. A PICTURE SHOWS THE DAMAGED TECH HUB ATTACHED TO THE BED AT THE BASE, WITH THE BOTTOM PORTION OF THE INNER HOUSING PANEL ATTACHED, THE SOUND MACHINE ATTACHED, AND THE CAMERA MISSING, AND THE ZIPPER STILL INTACT AND SECURED TO THE LOCKING LOOP WITH A LOCK. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 22188142 ↗
• MalfunctionMay 29, 2025Break; Material Separation; Break; Material Separation

  PER COMPLAINANT, A DME REPRESENTATIVE, THE CHILD CRACKED AND PUSHED OUT THE TECH HUB THEN PROCEEDED TO CLIMB THROUGH THE TECH HUB HOLE, CLIMB TO THE TOP OF THE BED AND JUMP ON THE TOP OF THE CANOPY LEADING TO A TEAR THE ROOF AND THE CHILD FALLING THROUGH. PER COMPLAINANT, NO INJURIES WERE REPORTED. TWO PICTURES WERE PROVIDED THAT SHOW TORN FABRIC ALONG THE EDGE OF THE ROOF. A PICTURE SHOWS THE TECH HUB PORTAL WHERE THE ZIPPER PULL TAB AND LOCKING LOOP ARE LOCKED TO THE PADLOCK, BUT THE PULL TAB (TAB WHERE ZIPPER IS PULLED BY THE USER) IS DISCONNECTED FROM THE SLIDER (COMPONENT THE MOVES ALONG THE ZIPPER TEETH) AND THERE IS NO TECH HUB IN THE PORTAL. TWO PICTURES SHOW THE TECH HUB, WHICH IS NOT ATTACHED TO THE BED, WITH A CRACK IN THE BOTTOM LEFT INTERNAL CORNER OF THE HOUSING AND THE TWO SIDES OF THE HOUSING ARE SEPARATED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 22108509 ↗
• MalfunctionMay 23, 2025Break; Break

  PER COMPLAINANT, HER SON DAMAGED HIS TECHNOLOGY HUB WHILE ENCLOSED IN HIS BED BY CHEWING THE FACE PLATE AND CHEWING APART A FEW OF THE WIRES AND SHE NOTICED THE DAMAGE A FEW DAYS BEFORE CONTACTING SENSORY MEDICAL. COMPLAINANT STATED THE TECH HUB HAS BEEN REPLACED WITH THE CLOTH PORTAL COVER IN THE BED. PER COMPLAINANT, THE CHILD IS NOT INJURED. A PICTURE SHOWS A CRACK IN THE BOTTOM RIGHT INTERNAL CORNER OF THE TECH HUB HOUSING ASSEMBLY. ANOTHER PICTURE SHOWS THE WIRE (LIKELY THE RADIO WIRE) THE CHILD CHEWED ON AND THE CONTROL INSERT WHICH WAS REMOVED FROM THE TECH HUB. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 22081434 ↗
• MalfunctionMay 14, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation

  THE PARENT REPORTED THAT HER CHILD DAMAGED THE TECHNOLOGY HUB HOUSING BY KICKING IT AND PULLED THE CAMERA WIRE FROM THE CAMERA AND WAS ABLE TO ELOPE THROUGH THE TECHNOLOGY HUB PORTAL AREA. THE PARENT CONFIRMED THERE WAS NO INJURY OR MEDICAL INTERVENTION AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 22020254 ↗
• MalfunctionApr 30, 2025Break; Break

  THE DME REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT THERE WAS DAMAGE TO THE TECHNOLOGY HUB. THE CHILD CHEWED THE TECH HUB CORDS FOR THE CAMERA AND LIGHT. THE ZIPPER THAT GOES AROUND THE TECH HUB WAS MISSING A FEW MOUNTING SCREWS FOR THE ZIPPER THAT MOUNTS AROUND THE OUTSIDE OF IT. PHOTOS PROVIDED BY THE DME SHOW THAT THE TECH HUB WAS NOT INSTALLED AND THE CLOTH COVER WAS NOT IN PLACE (THE TECH HUB PORTAL SIDE OF THE BED WAS PLACED AGAINST A WALL AND DID NOT HAVE THE TECH HUB OR CLOTH COVER INSTALLED AND THE WALL HAD PIECES REMOVED / CHIPPED OUT). THE PHOTOS SHOW THE TECH HUB HOUSING HAS SEPARATED AND THE ZIPPER RING WAS PARTIALLY DETACHED CONFIRMING THE DME'S STATEMENT THAT SOME OF THE SCREWS THAT MOUNT THE ZIPPER RING WERE MISSING. ANOTHER PHOTO CONFIRMS WHAT APPEAR TO BE CHEW MARKS ON THE LIGHT AND CAMERA CORDS. THE DME REPORTED THAT THE CHILD HAS A CONDITION THAT CAUSES HIM TO EAT NON-FOOD ITEMS. THERE WAS NO INJURY AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 21938656 ↗
• MalfunctionApr 18, 2025Break; Break

  THE MOTHER REPORTED THAT HER SON FORCEFULLY REMOVED THE TECH HUB ASSEMBLY, AND SUBSEQUENTLY THE REPLACED CLOTH COVER, FROM THE CANOPY BED AND WAS ABLE TO ELOPE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 21867089 ↗