Skip to content

G7 Acetabular Liner 010000733Recalls & reported problems

Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · Class 2 · Implant

All models of G7 Acetabular Liner (85)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00880304524910), received between Jan 12, 2016 and Aug 25, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated3
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1

Patient problems

  • Joint Dislocation2
  • Subluxation2
  • No Code Available1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 25, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY SIX YEARS POST-IMPLANTATION, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A HIP CLOSED REDUCTION DUE TO DISLOCATION. COMPONENTS WERE NOT REMOVED. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 22891681 ↗
  • InjuryOct 31, 2022Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT EXPERIENCED A SUBLUXATION WITH NON-SURGICAL REPOSITIONING APPROXIMATELY 12 DAYS POST IMPLANTATION. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A SECOND SUBLUXATION WITH A LIFTING TASK APPROXIMATELY 6 YEARS LATER AND A THIRD SUBLUXATION APPROXIMATELY 8 MONTHS LATER. NON-SURGICAL REPOSITIONING WAS PERFORMED AFTER BOTH EPISODES OF SUBLUXATION. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE REPORTED EVENT IS UNAVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; Subluxation

    MAUDE report 15704244 ↗
  • InjuryJan 12, 2016Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT UNDERWENT RIGHT TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY ON (B)(6) 2015. SUBSEQUENTLY, PATIENT UNDERWENT NON-SURGICAL REPOSITIONING ON (B)(6) 2015 DUE TO LUXATION. NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Code Available; Pain; Subluxation

    MAUDE report 5359948 ↗

Other prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer, + additive devices

All prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer, + additive devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page