Skip to content

Transducer S7-3t 989605439232Recalls & reported problems

Philips Ultrasound LLC · Class 2

All models of Transducer S7-3t (2)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

3 open recalls name this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
3

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00884838067530), received between Nov 17, 2017 and Jan 19, 2021 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Defective Device” (1 report).

3 FDA recall records name this device's identifier, 3 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Jul 3, 2025Class IIIOpen, Classified

    To provide clarification and labelling to define the useful life of ultrasound transducers in the field.

    Z-2395-2025 · Root cause: Device Design · Recall details · FDA record ↗

  2. May 28, 2025Class IIOpen, Classified

    Ultrasound transducer devices were refurbished beyond their useful life.

    Z-2060-2025 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

  3. May 28, 2025Class IIOpen, Classified

    Ultrasound transducer devices were refurbished beyond their useful life.

    Z-2061-2025 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Defective Device1
  • Device Operates Differently Than Expected1
  • Mechanical Jam1
  • Positioning Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 19, 2021Mechanical Jam; Mechanical Jam

    A CUSTOMER REPORTED AN S7-3T MODEL TRANSDUCER HAD AN ARTICULATION ISSUE DURING USE. THERE WAS NO INJURY ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 11197935 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 1, 2020Defective Device

    A CUSTOMER REPORTED AN S7-3T MODEL TRANSDUCER HAD NO ARTICULATION IN ANY DIRECTION. THERE WAS NO INJURY ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10221360 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 15, 2020Positioning Problem

    A CUSTOMER REPORTED AN S7-3T MODEL TRANSDUCER HAD A LOSS OF ANGLE MOVEMENT DURING A TEE EXAMINATION. THERE WAS NO INJURY ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 10063221 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 17, 2017Device Operates Differently Than Expected

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THE S7-3T TRANSDUCER WILL NOT ARTICULATE. THERE WAS NO INJURY ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7042650 ↗

Other System, imaging, pulsed doppler, ultrasonic devices

All System, imaging, pulsed doppler, ultrasonic devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page