Skip to content

CoRoent 6770710CP2Recalls & reported problems

Nuvasive, Inc. · Interlock II Ti-C, 7x17x14mm 10° · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00887517812414), received between May 27, 2022 and Feb 9, 2026 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture2
  • Break1
  • Crack1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 9, 2026Break; Crack

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CAGE WAS ATTACHED PROPERLY TO INSERTER BY SCRUB TECH. THE SURGEON LIGHTLY MALLETS THE INSERTER TO IMPLANT INTO PATIENT. AS HE STRIKES THE INSERTER THE CAGE CRACKS IN 2 DIFFERENT PLACES. THE THIN SUPPORTS BETWEEN EACH SCREW HOLE ON THE ANTERIOR SIDE CRACKED DEEPLY INTO THE PEEK AND THE IMPLANT NEEDED TO BE EXPLANTED AND REPLACED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24296467 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 3, 2023Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN INITIAL INTERBODY FUSION PROCEDURE USING TWO (2) INTERLOCK II INTERBODIES. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT BOTH INTERBODIES FRACTURED UPON INSERTION OF THE FIXATION SCREWS. THE 7MM INTERBODY FRACTURED AT THE THIN POINT DIRECTLY ABOVE THE CENTER SCREW. THE 7MM CAGE WAS SUBSEQUENTLY EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A NEW IMPLANT. ADDITIONALLY, THE 8MM CAGE FRACTURED ABOVE THE SCREW, TO THE LEFT OF THE DIRECTIONAL ARROW ON THE IMPLANT. THE 8MM CAGE WAS RETAINED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF ADVERSE PATIENT IMPACT AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. REPORT 1 OF 2.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17455964 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 27, 2022Fracture; Fracture

    INITIALLY, IT WAS REPORTED THE CAGE CRACKED INTRAOPERATIVELY WHILE IMPACTING INTO THE DISC SPACE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY OR ADVERSE IMPACT. UPON EVALUATION BY THE MANUFACTURER OF THE RETURNED CAGE, IT WAS FOUND PORTIONS OF THE CAGE WERE FRACTURED OFF.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14522471 ↗

Other Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical devices

All Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page