Skip to content

Likorall™ overhead lift 3122501NARecalls & reported problems

Liko AB · Overhead track patient lifting/transfer system · Class 1

All models of Likorall overhead lift (25)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00887761979499), received between Nov 4, 2024 and Nov 4, 2024 — classified as 1 malfunction.

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Sep 14, 2026Open, Classified

    Potential issue involving motor shaft breakage combined with reduced performance of the Single Fault Safety (SFS) system may lead to instances where the lift strap lowers more quickly than expected during use. Patients are at some risk for injury if a significant fall/drop were to occur due to this issue.

    Z-0151-2027 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 4, 2024

    DURING TESTING OF THE BAXTER LIKORALL 250 ES OVERHEAD PATIENT LIFTS IN FEBRUARY 2022, THE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING (BME) STAFF ATTACHED WEIGHT AND ENGAGED THE EMERGENCY STOP (E-STOP). THEY OBSERVED THE CENTRAL SUSPENSION POINT (CSP) DRIFTING, WHICH EXCEEDED 50 MILLIMETERS (MM). THIS IS VIOLATING ISO-10535 4.6.1.3, WHICH STATES "WHEN LOADED WITH THE MAXIMUM LOAD, THE CSP OR THE POINT OF THE HOIST/BODY-SUPPORT UNIT THAT MOVES OVER THE LARGEST DISTANCE SHALL HAVE A VERTICAL STOPPING DISTANCE OF NOT MORE THAN 50 MM." BME WORKED WITH BAXTER, AND BAXTER STATED THE LIFTS ARE COMPLIANT WITH ISO-10535, 4.2.5.17, WHICH STATES ELECTRICALLY OPERATED HOISTS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AN EMERGENCY STOPPING DEVICE FOR FULFILLING THE REQUIREMENTS IN IEC 60601-1:2005+AMD1: 2012+ AMD2: 2020, 9.2.4¿ AND 4.7.1.1 ¿THE RATE OF LIFTING OR LOWERING THE CENTRAL SUSPENSION POINT (CSP) (REFERENCE POINT ON BATHTUB HOISTS) SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.15 M/S WHEN LOADED." THEY PROVIDED AN ADDITIONAL DOCUMENT WHERE THEY STATE "AS A RESULT OF ACTIVATING THE EMERGENCY STOP, THE SELF-BREAKING OF THE ELECTRICAL MOTOR WILL SHUT OFF WHICH MAY ALLOW THE MOTOR TO DRIFT WHEN HEAVY LOAD IS APPLIED. IF THE EMERGENCY STOP BUTTON IS ACTIVA

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20597980 ↗

Other Lift, patient, non-ac-powered devices

All Lift, patient, non-ac-powered devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page