Skip to content

DISTRACTION, INTERNAL 51-564-30-09Recalls & reported problems

KLS-Martin L.P. · DIST, CRANIAL, ZURICH 2, END DRV, OPP RTCH, 1.5-1.8 MM SCREW, TI-6AL-4V · Class 2 · Implant

All models of DISTRACTION, INTERNAL (67)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888118082183), received between May 18, 2016 and Sep 23, 2022 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Break1
  • Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1

Patient problems

  • Impaired Healing2
  • No Code Available1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 23, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DISTRACTORS WOULD NOT ADVANCE, LIKELY DUE TO CONVERGENT VECTORS. THEY WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED.

    Patient problems: Impaired Healing

    MAUDE report 15473096 ↗
  • InjurySep 2, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DISTRACTORS STOPPED ADVANCING LIKELY DUE TO CONVERGENT VECTORS. THEY WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED.

    Patient problems: Impaired Healing

    MAUDE report 15352718 ↗
  • InjuryMay 18, 2016Break; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method

    A CRANIAL DISTRACTOR WAS IMPLANTED INTO A PEDIATRIC PATIENT. THE PATIENT'S PARENT ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE THE ACTIVATION ARM AND BROKE THE DISTRACTOR. THE SURGEON INSTRUCTED THEM NOT TO ATTEMPT TO REMOVE THE ACTIVATION ARM OR CARDANIC EXTENSION AGAIN TO AVOID ANOTHER BREAKAGE OF DEVICE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A SECONDARY SURGERY TO REPLACE THE BROKEN DEVICE.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 5662622 ↗

Other EXTERNAL MANDIBULAR FIXATOR AND/OR DISTRACTOR devices

All EXTERNAL MANDIBULAR FIXATOR AND/OR DISTRACTOR devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page