Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-1320BCNFRecalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · SUTR ANCH MICROBIO-COMP S-TAK 2.4X 6.5MM · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867009813), received between Aug 31, 2016 and Jun 2, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break5
  • Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method2
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Expiration Date Error1
  • Loose or Intermittent Connection1
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • Insufficient Information2
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 2, 2025Break; Break

    ON 15TH MAY 2025, IT WAS REPORTED BY AN ARTHREX EMPLOYEE VIA EMAIL THAT FOR AN AR-1320BCNF, SUTURE ANCHOR, MICRO BIOCOMPOSITE SUTURETAK® 2.4 X 6.5 MM WITH 2-0 FIBER WIRE® WITH TWO TAPER POINT NEEDLES, ITS ANCHOR BROKE DURING INSERTION. THIS WAS DETECTED DURING A REPAIR SURGERY FOR ANTERIOR TALOFIBULAR LIGAMENT INJURY OF THE ANKLE JOINT SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2025. THE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY BY USING A NEW AR-1320BCNF. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM AND NO SECONDARY PROCEDURES NEEDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22123281 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 20, 2025Break; Break

    ON 10TH MARCH 2025, IT WAS REPORTED BY AN ARTHREX EMPLOYEE VIA EMAIL THAT FOR AN AR-1320BCNF, SUTURE ANCHOR, MICRO BIOCOMPOSITE SUTURETAK® 2.4 X 6.5 MM WITH 2-0 FIBER WIRE® WITH TWO TAPER POINT NEEDLES'S ANCHOR BROKE OFF DURING INSERTION. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING A REPAIRING OF ANTERIOR TALOFIBULAR LIGAMENT INJURY OF ANKLE JOINT SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2025. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY BY USING A NEW AR-1320BCNF. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM AND NO SECONDARY PROCEDURES NEEDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21650858 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 16, 2024Break; Break

    ON 2ND SEPTEMBER 2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY AN ARTHREX EMPLOYEE VIA EMAIL THAT FOR AN AR-1320BCNF, SUTURE ANCHOR, MICRO BIOCOMPOSITE SUTURETAK® 2.4 X 6.5 MM WITH 2-0 FIBER WIRE® WITH TWO TAPER POINT NEEDLES, THE ANCHOR WAS BROKEN DURING INSERTION. THIS WAS DETECTED DURING REPAIR OF ANTERIOR TALOFIBULAR LIGAMENT INJURY OF ANKLE JOINT SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2024. A 2.0MM DRILL HEAD FROM AR-1320DSC KIT WAS USED TO PREPARE BONE SOCKET. THE END OF THE ANCHOR BROKE DURING INSERTION. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO PATIENT HARM BY USING ANOTHER NEW AR-1320BCNF INSTEAD.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20225782 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 3, 2024Break; Break

    ON 9TH MAY 2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY AN ARTHREX EMPLOYEE VIA EMAIL THAT FOR AN AR-1320BCNF, SUTURE ANCHOR, MICRO BIOCOMPOSITE SUTURETAK® 2.4 X 6.5 MM WITH 2-0 FIBER WIRE® WITH TWO TAPER POINT NEEDLES, THE ANCHOR WAS BROKEN DURING INSERTION. THIS WAS DETECTED DURING USE IN AN ANKLE LIGAMENT REPAIR PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY AS ANOTHER BRAND'S PRODUCT WAS USED. . PIECES BROKE INSIDE THE PATIENT BUT ALL FRAGMENTS WERE RETRIEVED. NO PATIENT HARM AND NO SECONDARY PROCEDURE WERE NEEDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19454083 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 29, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    ON 2/13/2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL THAT AN AR-1320BCNF SUTURE ANCHOR PULLED OUT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 18810053 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 13, 2021Break; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    ON 11/23/2021 , IT WAS REPORTED BY AN ARTHREX EMPLOYEE VIA EMAIL THAT AN AR1320BCNF SUTURETAK ANCHOR WAS IMPLANTED AND THE INSERTER SHAFT GOT STUCK TO THE IMPLANT. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING ANKLE LIGAMENT REPAIR AND INTERNAL FIXATION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021. BECAUSE THE SHAFT COULD NOT BE TAKEN OUT, THE IMPLANT BROKE. SURGEON COMPLETED PROCEDURE BY OPENING A NEW AR-1320BCNF SUTURETAK FROM A DIFFERENT LOT NUMBER.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12984975 ↗
  • InjuryMay 2, 2019Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Expiration Date Error

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN EXPIRED AR-1320BCNF, SUTURE ANCHOR MICRO BIOCOMPOSITE SUTURETAK (LOT: 10128646) WAS IMPLANTED DURING AN INTER-POSITIONAL ARTHROPLASTY OF THE SECOND METATARSAL PROCEDURE. THE REP STATED THE DEVICE WAS FACILITY OWNED AND WAS TAKEN FROM THE FACILITY'S STOCK. THE DEVICE EXPIRED ON 02/28/2019. THE CIRCULATOR NOTICED THE EXPIRATION DATE LABELED ON THE IMPLANT STICKER AFTER THE SURGEON HAD ALREADY IMPLANTED THE DEVICE. THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE THE IMPLANT, BUT WAS ONLY ABLE TO REMOVE THE SUTURE. THE REP CONFIRMED THE ANCHOR BODY REMAINS IMPLANTED. IN THE ATTEMPTS MADE TO REMOVE THE ANCHOR BODY, THE SURGEON REMOVED MORE BONE THAN THEY ORIGINALLY PLANNED FOR THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8574246 ↗
  • InjuryAug 31, 2016Loose or Intermittent Connection; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A HAND TFCC RECONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE THE DISPOSABLE KIT AR-1320DSC LOT 1188386 ((B)(4)) DID NOT HAVE THE NECESSARY DRILL SLEEVE. THE SURGEON DRILLED FOR THE ANCHORS WITHOUT USING A DRILL SLEEVE. AS A RESULT THE ANCHORS AR-1320BCNF, LOT 1304766 (QTY 2) ((B)(4)) WERE NOT SECURE AND PULLED OUT. THE PROCEDURE WAS NOT COMPLETED AS PLANNED. INSTEAD THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY CHANGING THE TECHNIQUE AND USING BONE TUNNELS.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 5918103 ↗

Other FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE devices

All FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page