Arthrex® AR-1320BCNFRecalls & reported problems
Arthrex, Inc. · SUTR ANCH MICROBIO-COMP S-TAK 2.4X 6.5MM · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 8
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867009813), received between Aug 31, 2016 and Jun 2, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break5
- Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method2
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Expiration Date Error1
- Loose or Intermittent Connection1
- Physical Resistance/Sticking1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- Insufficient Information2
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJun 2, 2025Break; Break
ON 15TH MAY 2025, IT WAS REPORTED BY AN ARTHREX EMPLOYEE VIA EMAIL THAT FOR AN AR-1320BCNF, SUTURE ANCHOR, MICRO BIOCOMPOSITE SUTURETAK® 2.4 X 6.5 MM WITH 2-0 FIBER WIRE® WITH TWO TAPER POINT NEEDLES, ITS ANCHOR BROKE DURING INSERTION. THIS WAS DETECTED DURING A REPAIR SURGERY FOR ANTERIOR TALOFIBULAR LIGAMENT INJURY OF THE ANKLE JOINT SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2025. THE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY BY USING A NEW AR-1320BCNF. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM AND NO SECONDARY PROCEDURES NEEDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22123281 ↗MalfunctionMar 20, 2025Break; Break
ON 10TH MARCH 2025, IT WAS REPORTED BY AN ARTHREX EMPLOYEE VIA EMAIL THAT FOR AN AR-1320BCNF, SUTURE ANCHOR, MICRO BIOCOMPOSITE SUTURETAK® 2.4 X 6.5 MM WITH 2-0 FIBER WIRE® WITH TWO TAPER POINT NEEDLES'S ANCHOR BROKE OFF DURING INSERTION. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING A REPAIRING OF ANTERIOR TALOFIBULAR LIGAMENT INJURY OF ANKLE JOINT SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2025. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY BY USING A NEW AR-1320BCNF. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM AND NO SECONDARY PROCEDURES NEEDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21650858 ↗MalfunctionSep 16, 2024Break; Break
ON 2ND SEPTEMBER 2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY AN ARTHREX EMPLOYEE VIA EMAIL THAT FOR AN AR-1320BCNF, SUTURE ANCHOR, MICRO BIOCOMPOSITE SUTURETAK® 2.4 X 6.5 MM WITH 2-0 FIBER WIRE® WITH TWO TAPER POINT NEEDLES, THE ANCHOR WAS BROKEN DURING INSERTION. THIS WAS DETECTED DURING REPAIR OF ANTERIOR TALOFIBULAR LIGAMENT INJURY OF ANKLE JOINT SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2024. A 2.0MM DRILL HEAD FROM AR-1320DSC KIT WAS USED TO PREPARE BONE SOCKET. THE END OF THE ANCHOR BROKE DURING INSERTION. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO PATIENT HARM BY USING ANOTHER NEW AR-1320BCNF INSTEAD.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20225782 ↗MalfunctionJun 3, 2024Break; Break
ON 9TH MAY 2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY AN ARTHREX EMPLOYEE VIA EMAIL THAT FOR AN AR-1320BCNF, SUTURE ANCHOR, MICRO BIOCOMPOSITE SUTURETAK® 2.4 X 6.5 MM WITH 2-0 FIBER WIRE® WITH TWO TAPER POINT NEEDLES, THE ANCHOR WAS BROKEN DURING INSERTION. THIS WAS DETECTED DURING USE IN AN ANKLE LIGAMENT REPAIR PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY AS ANOTHER BRAND'S PRODUCT WAS USED. . PIECES BROKE INSIDE THE PATIENT BUT ALL FRAGMENTS WERE RETRIEVED. NO PATIENT HARM AND NO SECONDARY PROCEDURE WERE NEEDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19454083 ↗MalfunctionFeb 29, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
ON 2/13/2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL THAT AN AR-1320BCNF SUTURE ANCHOR PULLED OUT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 18810053 ↗MalfunctionDec 13, 2021Break; Physical Resistance/Sticking
ON 11/23/2021 , IT WAS REPORTED BY AN ARTHREX EMPLOYEE VIA EMAIL THAT AN AR1320BCNF SUTURETAK ANCHOR WAS IMPLANTED AND THE INSERTER SHAFT GOT STUCK TO THE IMPLANT. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING ANKLE LIGAMENT REPAIR AND INTERNAL FIXATION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021. BECAUSE THE SHAFT COULD NOT BE TAKEN OUT, THE IMPLANT BROKE. SURGEON COMPLETED PROCEDURE BY OPENING A NEW AR-1320BCNF SUTURETAK FROM A DIFFERENT LOT NUMBER.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 12984975 ↗InjuryMay 2, 2019Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Expiration Date Error
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN EXPIRED AR-1320BCNF, SUTURE ANCHOR MICRO BIOCOMPOSITE SUTURETAK (LOT: 10128646) WAS IMPLANTED DURING AN INTER-POSITIONAL ARTHROPLASTY OF THE SECOND METATARSAL PROCEDURE. THE REP STATED THE DEVICE WAS FACILITY OWNED AND WAS TAKEN FROM THE FACILITY'S STOCK. THE DEVICE EXPIRED ON 02/28/2019. THE CIRCULATOR NOTICED THE EXPIRATION DATE LABELED ON THE IMPLANT STICKER AFTER THE SURGEON HAD ALREADY IMPLANTED THE DEVICE. THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE THE IMPLANT, BUT WAS ONLY ABLE TO REMOVE THE SUTURE. THE REP CONFIRMED THE ANCHOR BODY REMAINS IMPLANTED. IN THE ATTEMPTS MADE TO REMOVE THE ANCHOR BODY, THE SURGEON REMOVED MORE BONE THAN THEY ORIGINALLY PLANNED FOR THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8574246 ↗InjuryAug 31, 2016Loose or Intermittent Connection; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A HAND TFCC RECONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE THE DISPOSABLE KIT AR-1320DSC LOT 1188386 ((B)(4)) DID NOT HAVE THE NECESSARY DRILL SLEEVE. THE SURGEON DRILLED FOR THE ANCHORS WITHOUT USING A DRILL SLEEVE. AS A RESULT THE ANCHORS AR-1320BCNF, LOT 1304766 (QTY 2) ((B)(4)) WERE NOT SECURE AND PULLED OUT. THE PROCEDURE WAS NOT COMPLETED AS PLANNED. INSTEAD THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY CHANGING THE TECHNIQUE AND USING BONE TUNNELS.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 5918103 ↗
Other FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE devices
- GRYPHON ORTHOCORD 210813Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE712 reports
- HEALIX ADVANCE 222330Depuy Mitek, LLC · FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE1 recall607 reports
- HEALIX ADVANCE ORTHOCORD 222295Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE640 reports
- HEALICOIL 72205137Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Fastener, fixation, biodegradable, soft tissue427 reports
- HEALIX ADVANCE ORTHOCORD 222296Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE320 reports
- TWINFIX 72202597Smith & Nephew, Inc. · FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE288 reports
- Arthrex® AR-2324BCCArthrex, Inc. · FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE254 reports
- HEALIX ADVANCE 222331Depuy Mitek, LLC · FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE1 recall196 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page