Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-13280-60Recalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · SCREW, CANCELLOUS 6.5 X 60MM · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867010581), received between Aug 18, 2020 and Aug 20, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break5
  • Entrapment of Device2

Patient problems

  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque2
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 20, 2024Break; Break

    ON 7/22/2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY AN ARTHREX SUBSIDIARY EMPLOYEE VIA EMAIL THAT AN AR-13280-60 CANCELLOUS SCREW BROKE IN THE PATIENT. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING AN OSTEOTOMY PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 8/1/2024: THE BROKEN SCREW FRAGMENTS WERE NOT REMOVED. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED USING A NEW PLATE AND SCREW. THE CASE WAS NOT DELAYED, AND ADDITIONAL ANESTHESIA WAS NOT NECESSARY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20003679 ↗
  • InjuryJul 15, 2024Break; Break

    ON 04/24/2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY A PATIENT VIA PHONE THAT AFTER UNDERGOING A DISTAL FEMUR OSTEOTOMY ON (B)(6) 2023 ONE OF THE SIX IMPLANTED SCREWS BROKE. THIS WAS DISCOVERED 3 1/2 MONTHS POST-OP IN AN X-RAY. ON (B)(6) 2023, WHEN THIS PROCEDURE TOOK PLACE, AN AR-13280-60 CANCELLOUS SCREW, AN AR-13380-54 CORTICAL SCREW, AN AR-13280-60 CANCELLEOUS SCREW, AN AR-13380-50 CORTICAL SCREW, AN AR-13280-65 CANCELLEOUS SCREW, AND AN AR-13380-46 CANCELLEOUS SCREW WERE IMPLANTED. IT HAS NOT BEEN CONFIRMED WHICH SCREW BROKE. A POST-OP X-RAY WAS TAKEN 2 MONTHS POST-OP WHERE EVERYTHING LOOKED GOOD; HOWEVER, THE X-RAY TAKEN 3 1/2 MONTHS POST SHOWED A BROKEN SCREW THAT HAD PARTIALLY MADE ITS WAY. THE INTEGRITY OF THE HEALING BONE WILL DETERMINE WHEN A REVISION WILL BE TAKING PLACE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BY THE PATIENT WHERE HE STATED THAT A TEST HAD BEEN RUN TO CONFIRM THERE WERE NO DEFICIENCIES WITH HIS HEALTH THAT WOULD CAUSE THIS FAILURE. THE PATIENT WILL BE UNDERGOING A REVISION SURGERY WITH A TRAUMA SURGEON. THERE PATIENT STATED HIS FEMUR IS NOW SHORT ON BOTH SIDES DUE TO THE BREAKAGE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED ON 06/27/2024, WHERE THE PATIENT REPORTED THAT A REVISION P

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 19740478 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 13, 2021Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE WAS BROKEN DURING THE REMOVAL OF THE PLATE AND THE SCREWS ONE YEAR AFTER A HIGH TIBIAL OSTEOTOMY SURGERY. THE SCREWS AND THE PLATE WERE DISCARDED AND THE REMAINING BROKEN PARTS WERE NOT REMOVED OUT OF THE PATIENT. ACCORDING TO THE SURGEON NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY OCCURRED. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY. UPDATE 25-NOV-2021: IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THE SCREWS WERE ALREADY BROKEN BEFORE THE SURGEON TRIED TO REMOVE THEM. THE SURGERY WAS NO REVISION, AS THE DEFECT OF THE DEVICES WAS NOT SEEN ON THE X-RAYS BEFORE SURGERY. THE CORRECTION OF THE HIGH TIBIAL OSTEOTOMY WAS STILL FINE.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 12983612 ↗
  • InjuryAug 18, 2020Break; Entrapment of Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER AN INITIAL HTO SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE PROXIMAL SCREWS BROKE POST OP AND REMAINS IN THE PATIENTS BODY. THE SCREWS COULD NOT BE REMOVED DURING THE REVISION SURGERY. IT'S UNCLEAR IF THE SCREWS BROKE IN SITU OR DURING THE REVISION SURGERY. NO MORE INFORMATION AVAILABLE. NO X-RAYS ARE AVAILABLE. DEVICES ARE ALREADY DISCARDED AND NOT AVAILABLE FOR INVESTIGATION. FURTHER QUESTIONS WILL BE ASKED UPDATE 12-AUG-2020: IT WAS REPORTED BY THE CUSTOMER THAT SOME PROXIMAL SCREWS WERE BROKEN. WHEN REMOVING THE PLATE AND SCREWS THEY ALL BROKE AROUND 1CM FROM SCREWHEAD. THE PLATE AND SCREWS WERE (PARTIALLY) TAKEN OUT. THE SURGEON DECIDED THAT HE DID NOT WANT TO PLACE ANOTHER PLATE DUE TO PARTIAL CONSOLIDATION.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque

    MAUDE report 10421987 ↗
  • InjuryAug 18, 2020Break; Entrapment of Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROXIMAL SCREWS BROKE POST OP AND REMAINS IN THE PATIENTS BODY. NO MORE INFORMATION ARE AVAILABLE. NO X-RAYS ARE AVAILABLE. DEVICES ARE ALREADY DISCARDED AND NOT AVAILABLE FOR INVESTIGATION. UPDATE 17-AUG-2020: DURING A REMOVAL SURGERY THE HEAD OF THE SCREWS BROKE OFF AT THE PROXIMAL END. THE DISTAL PART OF THE SCREWS COULD NOT BE REMOVED AND WILL BE LEFT INSIDE OF THE PATIENT. THE PLATE AND THE HEAD OF THE SCREWS WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque

    MAUDE report 10421502 ↗

Other PLATE, FIXATION, BONE devices

All PLATE, FIXATION, BONE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page