Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-1547PSRecalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · TENO SCRW,PEEK,VENT · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867018785), received between Mar 8, 2021 and Dec 8, 2023 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3
  • Crack1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 8, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SURGERY THE IMPLANT WAS FOUND TO BE BROKEN. THE SURGEON REPORTED THAT THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY. (B)(6) 2021 UPDATE DW FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED THAT THE IMPLANT CRACKED WHILE THE SURGEON TRIED TO IMPLANT IT. NOTHING BROKE OFF FROM THE SCREW.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18296601 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 28, 2021Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE AR-1547PS SCREW WAS BEING USED FOR AN LRTI. DURING IMPLANT, THE SCREW BROKE UP INTO PARTS. ALL THE PARTS WERE RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT AND ANOTHER AR-1547PS WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12076006 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 8, 2021Break; Crack

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT UPON INSERTING THE AR-1547PS, 4.75 PEEK TENODESIS SCREW INTO BONE THE LEADING THREADS STARTED TO CRACK ON THE SCREW. THE SURGEON APPARENTLY NOTICED AT THIS POINT, BACKED OUT THE SCREW AND OPENED A NEW SCREW WHICH WENT IN NO PROBLEM. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITH NO ISSUES TO THE PATIENT OR WITH ANY OTHER PRODUCTS. THE BONE QUALITY WAS HARD. THE REP REPORTED A SMALL PIECE OF THE FIRST THREAD OF THE SCREW BROKE OFF. THE REP STATED THE SURGEON DID NOT MAKE ANY MENTION OF AN UNRETRIEVED FRAGMENT.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 11435906 ↗

Other Screw, fixation, bone devices

All Screw, fixation, bone devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page