Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-1934PI-30Recalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · PERC INSERT KIT FOR 3.0MM S-TAK · Class 1

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867024151), received between Sep 5, 2018 and Mar 19, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Fitting Problem1
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Discomfort1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 19, 2026Break

    ON (B)(6) 2026, IT WAS REPORTED BY ARTHREX LEGAL VIA EMAIL THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A PROCEDURE TO CORRECT A GLENOHUMERAL INSTABILITY ON (B)(6) 2022. THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF NECK AND SHOULDER PAIN FOR A PERIOD FOLLOWING THE SURGERY. A FOLLOW-UP X RAY IN 2023 REVEALED A BROKEN METAL FRAGMENT IN THE SHOULDER SPACE. THE ORIGIN DEVICE OF THE METAL FRAGMENT IS UNKNOWN. THERE WAS A REVISION PROCEDURE IN (B)(6) 2024 TO REMOVE THE FRAGMENT. THE PRODUCTS USED IN THE ORIGINAL PROCEDURE WERE: AR-1934PI-30 PERC INSERT KIT, (3) THREE AR-1938BC SUTURE ANCHOR, (3) THREE AR-3636 FIBERTAK ANCHORS, AND (2) TWO AR-6570F FLEXIBLE CANNULAS.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 24637949 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 23, 2024Fitting Problem; Fitting Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED ON 07/15/2022 BY A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE VIA SEMS THAT AN AR-1934PI-30NITINOL WIRE WOULD NOT FIT THROUGH THE DILATOR IN THE PERCUTANEOUS KIT.. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING A CASE WITH NO PATIENT HARM. PER FACILITY: "DURING A SUPERIOR CAPSULAR RECONSTRUCTION, THE SURGEON WAS TRYING TO INSERT SOME 3.0 SUTURETAKS PERCUTANEOUSLY ON THE GLENOID. WHEN DOING THE SEQUENTIAL STEPS TO INSERT THE ANCHORS PERCUTANEOUSLY WITH THE KIT, THE NITINOL WIRE WOULD NOT FIT THROUGH THE DILATOR IN THE PERCUTANEOUS KIT. THE SIZING WAS VERY OFF IT SEEMS, THEREFORE THE KIT WAS UNABLE TO BE USED DUE TO IT NOT FUNCTIONING PROPERLY. WE HAD TO DISCARD THE KIT AND OPEN A NEW ONE. THE KIT WAS VERY CLEARLY DEFECTIVE"

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19387972 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 6, 2023Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    ON (B)(6),2023 IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA (B)(4) THAT AN AR-1934PI-30 PERCUTANEOUS INSERTION KITS DRILL GOT STUCK IN THE GUIDE AND COULD NOT BE REMOVED. THIS OCCURRED DURING A CASE, AND ANOTHER DRILL WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT EFFECT REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18074015 ↗
  • InjurySep 5, 2018Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS DISCOVERED DURING MAUDE REVIEW AND WAS RECEIVED VIA FDA MEDWATCH LETTER (MW5078672) THAT A PATIENT HAD UNDERGONE A RIGHT SHOULDER ARTHROSCOPY WITH INFERIOR LABRAL REPAIR. PATIENT WAS DOING WELL AND BEGAN HAVING INCREASING DISCOMFORT TO THIS RIGHT ELBOW OVER A PERIOD OF THREE DAYS WITH SIGNIFICANT PAIN AND LUMP NOTED PROXIMAL TO THE ANTECUBITAL FOSSA NEAR THE DISTAL BICEPS TENDON, WITH NO REPORT OF INJURY, WHICH PROMPTED PATIENT TO GO TO THE CLINIC. X-RAYS OBTAINED IN THE CLINIC INDICATED OBVIOUS METAL FOREIGN BODY LOCATED WITHIN THE RIGHT ELBOW. PATIENT WAS SCHEDULED FOR FOREIGN BODY REMOVAL FROM THE RIGHT ELBOW. OP NOTE INDICATED "THE OBJECT WAS A METAL NITINOL GUIDE-WIRE". SURGEON CONSULTED WITH PATIENT'S PARENTS. THE FOLLOWING WAS ALSO NOTED ON THE FDA MEDWATCH LETTER RECEIVED BY ARTHREX: EVENT WAS REPORTABLE TO THE STATE OF MN (4. RETENTION OF A FOREIGN OBJECT IN A PATIENT AFTER SURGERY OR OTHER INVASIVE PROCEDURE, EXCLUDING OBJECTS INTENTIONALLY IMPLANTED AS PART OF A PLANNED INTERVENTION AND OBJECT PRESENT PRIOR TO SURGERY THAT ARE INTENTIONALLY RETAINED). DEVICE WAS A FRAGMENT FROM A PERCUTANEOUS INSERTION KIT FOR 3 MM SUTURE-TAK LABRAL REPAIR. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

    Patient problems: Discomfort; Foreign Body In Patient; Pain

    MAUDE report 7845653 ↗

Other ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices

All ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page