Arthrex® AR-1934PI-30Recalls & reported problems
Arthrex, Inc. · PERC INSERT KIT FOR 3.0MM S-TAK · Class 1
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867024151), received between Sep 5, 2018 and Mar 19, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Fitting Problem1
- Physical Resistance/Sticking1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Discomfort1
- Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 19, 2026Break
ON (B)(6) 2026, IT WAS REPORTED BY ARTHREX LEGAL VIA EMAIL THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A PROCEDURE TO CORRECT A GLENOHUMERAL INSTABILITY ON (B)(6) 2022. THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF NECK AND SHOULDER PAIN FOR A PERIOD FOLLOWING THE SURGERY. A FOLLOW-UP X RAY IN 2023 REVEALED A BROKEN METAL FRAGMENT IN THE SHOULDER SPACE. THE ORIGIN DEVICE OF THE METAL FRAGMENT IS UNKNOWN. THERE WAS A REVISION PROCEDURE IN (B)(6) 2024 TO REMOVE THE FRAGMENT. THE PRODUCTS USED IN THE ORIGINAL PROCEDURE WERE: AR-1934PI-30 PERC INSERT KIT, (3) THREE AR-1938BC SUTURE ANCHOR, (3) THREE AR-3636 FIBERTAK ANCHORS, AND (2) TWO AR-6570F FLEXIBLE CANNULAS.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 24637949 ↗MalfunctionMay 23, 2024Fitting Problem; Fitting Problem
IT WAS REPORTED ON 07/15/2022 BY A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE VIA SEMS THAT AN AR-1934PI-30NITINOL WIRE WOULD NOT FIT THROUGH THE DILATOR IN THE PERCUTANEOUS KIT.. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING A CASE WITH NO PATIENT HARM. PER FACILITY: "DURING A SUPERIOR CAPSULAR RECONSTRUCTION, THE SURGEON WAS TRYING TO INSERT SOME 3.0 SUTURETAKS PERCUTANEOUSLY ON THE GLENOID. WHEN DOING THE SEQUENTIAL STEPS TO INSERT THE ANCHORS PERCUTANEOUSLY WITH THE KIT, THE NITINOL WIRE WOULD NOT FIT THROUGH THE DILATOR IN THE PERCUTANEOUS KIT. THE SIZING WAS VERY OFF IT SEEMS, THEREFORE THE KIT WAS UNABLE TO BE USED DUE TO IT NOT FUNCTIONING PROPERLY. WE HAD TO DISCARD THE KIT AND OPEN A NEW ONE. THE KIT WAS VERY CLEARLY DEFECTIVE"
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19387972 ↗MalfunctionNov 6, 2023Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking
ON (B)(6),2023 IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA (B)(4) THAT AN AR-1934PI-30 PERCUTANEOUS INSERTION KITS DRILL GOT STUCK IN THE GUIDE AND COULD NOT BE REMOVED. THIS OCCURRED DURING A CASE, AND ANOTHER DRILL WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT EFFECT REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18074015 ↗InjurySep 5, 2018Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS DISCOVERED DURING MAUDE REVIEW AND WAS RECEIVED VIA FDA MEDWATCH LETTER (MW5078672) THAT A PATIENT HAD UNDERGONE A RIGHT SHOULDER ARTHROSCOPY WITH INFERIOR LABRAL REPAIR. PATIENT WAS DOING WELL AND BEGAN HAVING INCREASING DISCOMFORT TO THIS RIGHT ELBOW OVER A PERIOD OF THREE DAYS WITH SIGNIFICANT PAIN AND LUMP NOTED PROXIMAL TO THE ANTECUBITAL FOSSA NEAR THE DISTAL BICEPS TENDON, WITH NO REPORT OF INJURY, WHICH PROMPTED PATIENT TO GO TO THE CLINIC. X-RAYS OBTAINED IN THE CLINIC INDICATED OBVIOUS METAL FOREIGN BODY LOCATED WITHIN THE RIGHT ELBOW. PATIENT WAS SCHEDULED FOR FOREIGN BODY REMOVAL FROM THE RIGHT ELBOW. OP NOTE INDICATED "THE OBJECT WAS A METAL NITINOL GUIDE-WIRE". SURGEON CONSULTED WITH PATIENT'S PARENTS. THE FOLLOWING WAS ALSO NOTED ON THE FDA MEDWATCH LETTER RECEIVED BY ARTHREX: EVENT WAS REPORTABLE TO THE STATE OF MN (4. RETENTION OF A FOREIGN OBJECT IN A PATIENT AFTER SURGERY OR OTHER INVASIVE PROCEDURE, EXCLUDING OBJECTS INTENTIONALLY IMPLANTED AS PART OF A PLANNED INTERVENTION AND OBJECT PRESENT PRIOR TO SURGERY THAT ARE INTENTIONALLY RETAINED). DEVICE WAS A FRAGMENT FROM A PERCUTANEOUS INSERTION KIT FOR 3 MM SUTURE-TAK LABRAL REPAIR. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Patient problems: Discomfort; Foreign Body In Patient; Pain
MAUDE report 7845653 ↗
Other ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices
- AML EXCEL 2001-42-000Depuy (Ireland) · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT2,009 reports
- NA 03.010.523Synthes GmbH · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT1,208 reports
- EXPRESSEW 214141Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT1,166 reports
- N/A 9560524Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT866 reports
- INHANCE 6500-11-104Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic manual surgical instrument831 reports
- INHANCE 6500-11-102Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic manual surgical instrument567 reports
- R3 71364450Smith & Nephew, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT520 reports
- N/A 9561524Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT494 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page