Arthrex® AR-2600SBS-5Recalls & reported problems
Arthrex, Inc. · SPEEDBRG IMPL SYS W/BIO-COMPR SWVLK SP · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867027329), received between Nov 3, 2016 and Dec 29, 2023 — classified as 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Use of Device Problem” (2 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Mar 24, 2017Class IITerminated
Some eyelets broke from SwiveLock Anchor on insertion.
Z-2045-2017 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Use of Device Problem2
- Break1
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Unintended Movement1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- Insufficient Information1
- No Information1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 29, 2023Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SHOULDER SURGERY THE PUNCH (AR-1927PBS) OF THE SPEEDBRIDGE IMPLANT SYSTEM WAS LOOSE INSIDE THE HANDLE. THEREFORE IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO REMOVE BONE AS USUAL. THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY AND THE SAME DEVICE WAS USED ANYWAY. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18419685 ↗MalfunctionNov 21, 2023Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement
ON (B)(6) 2023, IT WAS REPORTED BY A DISTRIBUTOR VIA (B)(4) THAT THE HANDLE OF THE PUNCH FROM AN AR-2600SBS-5 SPEEDBRIDGE IMPLANT SYSTEM WITH BIOCOMPOSITE SWIVELOCK SP WAS ROTATING WHILE TRYING TO PULL IT OUT AFTER MALLET TO PREPARE THE SOCKET. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING AN RCR PROCEDURE ON 10/24/2023. AFTER THE PUNCH WAS REMOVED, THE CASE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITHOUT FURTHER ISSUES.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 18182028 ↗MalfunctionOct 23, 2023Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SURGERY THE BONE PUNCH OF THE DEVICE LOOSENED WHEN PUNCHING THE PILOT HOLE. ACCORDING TO THE SURGEON NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY OCCURRED. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH THE SAME DEVICE. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17987291 ↗MalfunctionJul 19, 2023Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR SURGERY THE BLUE HANDLE OF THE PUNCH FROM THE SPEEDBRIDGE KIT WAS NOT WORKING. THE HANDLE WAS NOT FIXED TO THE METAL, SO WHEN THEY TRIED TO REMOVE THE PUNCH FROM BONE, ONLY THE HANDLE ROTATED, NOT THE METAL PART. IT WAS HARD FOR THEM TO REMOVE THE PUNCH FROM THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH THE SAME DEVICE WAS USED ANYWAY. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17350927 ↗InjuryNov 3, 2016Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SHOULDER SCOPE, THE SURGEON WAS ATTEMPTING TO USE THE AR-2600SBS-5, SPEEDBRIDGE IMPLANT SYSTEM WITH BIO-COMPOSITE SWIVELOCK. THE SURGEON WAS INSERTING THE WHITE THREADED SWIVELOCK ANCHOR OF THE IMPLANT SYSTEM. THE SWIVELOCK ANCHOR WAS IMPLANTED APPROXIMATELY TWO THIRDS OF THE WAY WHEN THE REMAINING ONE THIRD OF THE ANCHOR BROKE OFF. THE SURGEON PULLED ON THE TWO THIRDS PORTION OF THE ANCHOR THAT WAS IMPLANTED AND FELT IT WAS SECURE AND SUFFICIENT TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 6076879 ↗
Other FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE devices
- GRYPHON ORTHOCORD 210813Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE712 reports
- HEALIX ADVANCE 222330Depuy Mitek, LLC · FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE1 recall607 reports
- HEALIX ADVANCE ORTHOCORD 222295Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE640 reports
- HEALICOIL 72205137Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Fastener, fixation, biodegradable, soft tissue427 reports
- HEALIX ADVANCE ORTHOCORD 222296Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE320 reports
- TWINFIX 72202597Smith & Nephew, Inc. · FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE288 reports
- Arthrex® AR-2324BCCArthrex, Inc. · FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE254 reports
- HEALIX ADVANCE 222331Depuy Mitek, LLC · FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE1 recall196 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page