Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-2600SBS-5Recalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · SPEEDBRG IMPL SYS W/BIO-COMPR SWVLK SP · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867027329), received between Nov 3, 2016 and Dec 29, 2023 — classified as 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Use of Device Problem” (2 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Mar 24, 2017Class IITerminated

    Some eyelets broke from SwiveLock Anchor on insertion.

    Z-2045-2017 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Use of Device Problem2
  • Break1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Unintended Movement1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 29, 2023Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SHOULDER SURGERY THE PUNCH (AR-1927PBS) OF THE SPEEDBRIDGE IMPLANT SYSTEM WAS LOOSE INSIDE THE HANDLE. THEREFORE IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO REMOVE BONE AS USUAL. THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY AND THE SAME DEVICE WAS USED ANYWAY. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18419685 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 21, 2023Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement

    ON (B)(6) 2023, IT WAS REPORTED BY A DISTRIBUTOR VIA (B)(4) THAT THE HANDLE OF THE PUNCH FROM AN AR-2600SBS-5 SPEEDBRIDGE IMPLANT SYSTEM WITH BIOCOMPOSITE SWIVELOCK SP WAS ROTATING WHILE TRYING TO PULL IT OUT AFTER MALLET TO PREPARE THE SOCKET. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING AN RCR PROCEDURE ON 10/24/2023. AFTER THE PUNCH WAS REMOVED, THE CASE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITHOUT FURTHER ISSUES.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 18182028 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 23, 2023Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SURGERY THE BONE PUNCH OF THE DEVICE LOOSENED WHEN PUNCHING THE PILOT HOLE. ACCORDING TO THE SURGEON NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY OCCURRED. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH THE SAME DEVICE. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17987291 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 19, 2023Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR SURGERY THE BLUE HANDLE OF THE PUNCH FROM THE SPEEDBRIDGE KIT WAS NOT WORKING. THE HANDLE WAS NOT FIXED TO THE METAL, SO WHEN THEY TRIED TO REMOVE THE PUNCH FROM BONE, ONLY THE HANDLE ROTATED, NOT THE METAL PART. IT WAS HARD FOR THEM TO REMOVE THE PUNCH FROM THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH THE SAME DEVICE WAS USED ANYWAY. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17350927 ↗
  • InjuryNov 3, 2016Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SHOULDER SCOPE, THE SURGEON WAS ATTEMPTING TO USE THE AR-2600SBS-5, SPEEDBRIDGE IMPLANT SYSTEM WITH BIO-COMPOSITE SWIVELOCK. THE SURGEON WAS INSERTING THE WHITE THREADED SWIVELOCK ANCHOR OF THE IMPLANT SYSTEM. THE SWIVELOCK ANCHOR WAS IMPLANTED APPROXIMATELY TWO THIRDS OF THE WAY WHEN THE REMAINING ONE THIRD OF THE ANCHOR BROKE OFF. THE SURGEON PULLED ON THE TWO THIRDS PORTION OF THE ANCHOR THAT WAS IMPLANTED AND FELT IT WAS SECURE AND SUFFICIENT TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 6076879 ↗

Other FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE devices

All FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page