Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-2654CRRecalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · CLAV FRAC PLT,CENTRAL THIRD,RT,SS · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867027473), received between Jan 15, 2019 and Sep 9, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Fracture1

Patient problems

  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 9, 2024Break; Break

    UPDATE AVOE 20-SEP-2024: FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED THAT THE INITIAL SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON THE (B)(6) 2024 AND THE DEVICE IMPLANTED WAS THE PLATE AR-2654CR (LOT 15151774).

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 20169984 ↗
  • InjuryJan 27, 2020Break; Fracture; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PLATE FRACTURE CLAVICLE OCCURRED FIVE WEEKS AFTER THE PRIMARY IMPLANTATION IN A YOUNG, HEALTHY PATIENT WITH AN ACUTE FRACTURE. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE PLATE WAS NOT PRE-BENT. THE BROKEN PLATE SHOWS THAT A PLASTIC DEFORMITY OCCURRED BEFORE THE FRACTURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 10-JAN-2020. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE OSTEOSYNTHESIS CLAVICLE SURGERY WAS INITIALLY SUCCESSFULLY PERFORMED IN (B)(6) 2019. DUE TO THE INITIALLY REPORTED EVENT A REOSTEOSYNTHESIS WITH A SYNTHESIS PLATE WAS NEEDED AND THE REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED SUCCESSFULLY ON (B)(6) 2019.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 9631338 ↗
  • InjuryJan 15, 2019Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT NEEDED A REVISION TO REPLACE THE AR-2654CR CLAVICLE PLATE WITH AN AR-2653CR PLATE. THE PLATE BROKE; PER THE PATIENT, HE WOKE UP ONE DAY IN PAIN AND X-RAYS CONFIRMED THE PLATE HAD BROKEN. CASE WAS A CLAVICLE ORIF; ORIGINAL DATE OF SURGERY WAS (B)(6) 2018. BOTH THE ORIGINAL CASE AND THE REVISION WERE DONE AT THE SAME FACILITY WITH THE SAME SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 8247838 ↗

Other Plate, fixation, bone devices

All Plate, fixation, bone devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page