Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-8724V-18Recalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · 2.4 X 18MM VAL SCREW, Ti · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
10
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867045613), received between Jan 9, 2020 and Dec 4, 2025 — classified as 4 injuries, 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Advance” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 3 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 2 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520263
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Advance3
  • Break2
  • Positioning Failure2
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Patient-Device Incompatibility1
  • Unintended Movement1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque2
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Impaired Healing1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Code Available1
  • Rash1
  • Reaction1

Recent adverse event reports

The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 4, 2025Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure

    ON (B)(6) 2025, A SALES REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED VIA PHONE THAT AN AR-8916VNL-03 VOLAR DISTAL RADIUS PLATE AND TWO AR-8724V-18 LOW PROFILE VA LOCKING SCREWS FAILED DURING A VOLAR DISTAL RADIUS ORIF PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025. WHILE INSERTING THE SCREWS INTO THE TWO MOST DISTAL HOLES OF THE PLATE USING AN AR-8916TL-011 TORQUE LIMITER, THE SCREWS DID NOT LOCK INTO THE PLATE AND PASSED STRAIGHT THROUGH. THE PLATE AND SCREWS WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT, AND THE CASE WAS COMPLETED USING A REPLACEMENT AR-8916VNL-03 PLATE AND TWO NEW LOW PROFILE VA LOCKING SCREWS. THE PATIENT HAD SOFTER BONE, WHICH HAD BEEN PREPARED USING AN ELEVATOR. THE CASE WAS DELAYED APPROXIMATELY 5¿10 MINUTES, REQUIRING ADDITIONAL ANESTHESIA. THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23718979 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 4, 2025Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure

    ON 11/17/2025, A SALES REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED VIA PHONE THAT AN AR-8916VNL-03 VOLAR DISTAL RADIUS PLATE AND TWO AR-8724V-18 LOW PROFILE VA LOCKING SCREWS FAILED DURING A VOLAR DISTAL RADIUS ORIF PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025. WHILE INSERTING THE SCREWS INTO THE TWO MOST DISTAL HOLES OF THE PLATE USING A AR-8916TL-011 TORQUE LIMITER, THE SCREWS DID NOT LOCK INTO THE PLATE AND PASSED STRAIGHT THROUGH. THE PLATE AND SCREWS WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT, AND THE CASE WAS COMPLETED USING A REPLACEMENT AR-8916VNL-03 PLATE AND TWO NEW LOW PROFILE VA LOCKING SCREWS. THE PATIENT HAD SOFTER BONE, WHICH HAD BEEN PREPARED USING AN ELEVATOR. THE CASE WAS DELAYED APPROXIMATELY 5¿10 MINUTES, REQUIRING ADDITIONAL ANESTHESIA. THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23718694 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 16, 2024Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement

    ON 3/31/2022, IT WAS REPORTED BY A DISTRIBUTOR VIA EMAIL THAT AN AR-8724V-18 LOW PROFILE VA LOCKING SCREW DID NOT LOCK INTO THE PLATE AND PASSED RIGHT THROUGH THE PLATE INTO THE BONE UNDER THE PLATE. SURGEON WAS ABLE TO REMOVE THE SCREW AND DID NOT HAVE TO REMOVE THE PLATE. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING A DISTAL RADIUS PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19331801 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 7, 2024Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance

    ON 02/23/2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA PHONE THAT AN AR-8724V-20 LOW PROFILE VA LOCKING SCREW WENT THROUGH THE PLATE, AND (3) AR-8724V-18 LOW PROFILE VA LOCKING SCREWS WOULD NOT LOCK INTO THE PLATE. THIS OCCURRED DURING A DISTAL RADIUS PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024, WHERE THE PLATE WAS STILL USED IN THE CASE HOWEVER, A SCREW WAS NOT PLACED IN THE AREA WHERE THE AR-8724V-20 WENT THROUGH. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED USING SCREWS FROM A MINI FRAG SET. THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18859860 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 7, 2024Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance

    ON 02/23/2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA PHONE THAT AN AR-8724V-20 LOW PROFILE VA LOCKING SCREW WENT THROUGH THE PLATE, AND (3) AR-8724V-18 LOW PROFILE VA LOCKING SCREWS WOULD NOT LOCK INTO THE PLATE. THIS OCCURRED DURING A DISTAL RADIUS PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024, WHERE THE PLATE WAS STILL USED IN THE CASE HOWEVER, A SCREW WAS NOT PLACED IN THE AREA WHERE THE AR-8724V-20 WENT THROUGH. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED USING SCREWS FROM A MINI FRAG SET. THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18859620 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 7, 2024Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance

    ON 02/23/2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA PHONE THAT AN AR-8724V-20 LOW PROFILE VA LOCKING SCREW WENT THROUGH THE PLATE, AND (3) AR-8724V-18 LOW PROFILE VA LOCKING SCREWS WOULD NOT LOCK INTO THE PLATE. THIS OCCURRED DURING A DISTAL RADIUS PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024, WHERE THE PLATE WAS STILL USED IN THE CASE HOWEVER, A SCREW WAS NOT PLACED IN THE AREA WHERE THE AR-8724V-20 WENT THROUGH. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED USING SCREWS FROM A MINI FRAG SET. THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18859440 ↗
  • InjuryAug 27, 2020Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT HAD UNDERGONE A PROCEDURE (B)(6) 2020. THE FIRST WEEK OF (B)(6) 2020 THE PATIENT HAD A FOLLOW UP VISIT AT THE SURGEON'S OFFICE AND X-RAYS TAKEN DURING THE FOLLOW UP SHOWED A FOREIGN BODY IS PRESENT. THE ITEM HAD NOT BEEN SEEN ON THE INTRAOPERATIVE X-RAYS TAKEN AT THE TIME OF PROCEDURE. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THE FOREIGN BODY IS NOT CAUSING ANY PAIN OR DISCOMFORT TO THE PATIENT. SURGEON BELIEVES THAT THE FOREIGN BODY MAY BE A THIN SHAVING FROM THE NARROW ULNAR PLATE/PLATE SCREWS THAT HAD BEEN IMPLANTED. SURGEON ALSO INDICATED THAT HE HAS SEEN THIS OCCUR PREVIOUSLY WITH THE ARTHREX SYSTEM THAT WAS USED. (INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED REGARDING THESE INSTANCES.) THE SHAVING WAS NOT NOTICED AT THE TIME OF OCCURRENCE TO DETERMINE THE SPECIFIC PRODUCT THE SHAVING MAY HAVE COME FROM. AT THIS TIME THE SURGEON DOES NOT HAVE PLANS TO REMOVE THE HARDWARE OR FOREIGN BODY BUT THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE HAS REQUESTED THAT THE SURGEON NOTIFY HIM IF A SECOND SURGERY IS SCHEDULED. THE FOLLOWING ARE THE PLATE AND SCREWS THAT WERE USED DURING THE (B)(6) 2020 PROCEDURE: AR-8916VNL-03, VOLAR DISTAL RADIUS PLATE, LOT 10440051. AR-8724-18, LOW PROFILE SCREW, LOT W652321.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque

    MAUDE report 10460714 ↗
  • InjuryAug 27, 2020Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT HAD UNDERGONE A PROCEDURE (B)(6) 2020. THE FIRST WEEK OF (B)(6) 2020 THE PATIENT HAD A FOLLOW UP VISIT AT THE SURGEON'S OFFICE AND X-RAYS TAKEN DURING THE FOLLOW UP SHOWED A FOREIGN BODY IS PRESENT. THE ITEM HAD NOT BEEN SEEN ON THE INTRAOPERATIVE X-RAYS TAKEN AT THE TIME OF PROCEDURE. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THE FOREIGN BODY IS NOT CAUSING ANY PAIN OR DISCOMFORT TO THE PATIENT. SURGEON BELIEVES THAT THE FOREIGN BODY MAY BE A THIN SHAVING FROM THE NARROW ULNAR PLATE/PLATE SCREWS THAT HAD BEEN IMPLANTED. SURGEON ALSO INDICATED THAT HE HAS SEEN THIS OCCUR PREVIOUSLY WITH THE ARTHREX SYSTEM THAT WAS USED. (INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED REGARDING THESE INSTANCES.) THE SHAVING WAS NOT NOTICED AT THE TIME OF OCCURRENCE TO DETERMINE THE SPECIFIC PRODUCT THE SHAVING MAY HAVE COME FROM. AT THIS TIME THE SURGEON DOES NOT HAVE PLANS TO REMOVE THE HARDWARE OR FOREIGN BODY BUT THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE HAS REQUESTED THAT THE SURGEON NOTIFY HIM IF A SECOND SURGERY IS SCHEDULED. THE FOLLOWING ARE THE PLATE AND SCREWS THAT WERE USED DURING THE (B)(6) 2020 PROCEDURE: AR-8916VNL-03, VOLAR DISTAL RADIUS PLATE, LOT 10440051. AR-8724-18, LOW PROFILE SCREW, LOT W652321.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque

    MAUDE report 10460606 ↗
  • InjuryJun 23, 2020Patient-Device Incompatibility; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE PRODUCT TEAM THAT A SALES REP HAS REPORTED A POSSIBLE PATIENT REACTION INCIDENT INVOLVING AN ARTHREX VOLAR PLATE. THE MATERIAL COMPOSITION INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO THE SALES REP, FOR THE SURGEON, BY THE PRODUCT TEAM. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED 6/1/2020: THE PATIENT HAD UNDERGONE A DISTAL RADIUS FRACTURE ORIF PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2020. THE PATIENT HAD THE INITIAL POST OP VISIT ON (B)(6) 2020 AT WHICH TIME THE PATIENT WAS TAKEN TO THE OR FOR AND IRRIGATION AND DEBRIDEMENT FOR A PRESUMED INFECTION. CULTURES HAS ALL BEEN NEGATIVE: NEGATIVE AEROBIC, ANAEROBIC, FUNGAL AND AFB. SYMPTOMS OF DRAINAGE, BLISTERING, RASHES AND WOUND HEALING ISSUES HAVE ALL BEEN ASSESSED BY THE SURGEON, INFECTIOUS DISEASE AND DERMATOLOGY. PATIENT HAS BEEN TREATED TO DATE WITH STEROIDS AND ANTIBIOTICS (TOPICAL AND ORAL). IT IS UNKNOWN IF PATIENT HAS BEEN TESTED FOR SPECIFIC KNOWN ALLERGIES HOWEVER IT HAS BEEN REPORTED THAT PATIENT HAS DEVELOPED ALLERGIC REACTION TO ALMOST EVERYTHING (ADHESIVE, SUTURE, PREP, MULTIPLE ANTIBIOTICS). THE PATIENT HAS AN ALLERGIST VISIT SCHEDULED FOR (B)(6) 2020. THE FOLLOWING ARE THE ARTHREX DEVICES THAT WERE IMPLANTED DURING THE (B)(6) 2020 PROCEDU

    Patient problems: Impaired Healing; No Code Available; Rash; Reaction

    MAUDE report 10184188 ↗
  • InjuryJan 9, 2020Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON HAD TO REMOVE THE WRIST SPANNING PLATE, AR-8916SPN, BECAUSE THE SCREWS WERE BACKING OUT OF THE DISTAL HOLES. NO FURTHER INFORMATION, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED (B)(6) 2019: CASE DATE OF IMPLANTATION: (B)(6) 2019. CASE DATE OF EXPLANTATION: NOT YET DETERMINED THE FOLLOWING SCREWS WERE ALSO EXPLANTED DURING THE REVISION: AR-8724-12 LOT: 2542021. AR-8724V-12 LOT: 2605841. AR-8724V-18 LOT: 2605831. AR-8935-14 LOT: 10176201. AR-8935-14 LOT:10249431. THE SPECIFIC DATE OF THE SECOND SURGERY (EXPLANT) IS UNKNOWN, HOWEVER IT IS KNOWN THAT THE DATE WAS PRIOR TO (B)(6) 2019. FOR REPORTING PURPOSES (B)(6) 2019 HAS BEEN ENTERED AS THE DATE OF EVENT.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 9569899 ↗

Other PLATE, FIXATION, BONE devices

All PLATE, FIXATION, BONE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page