Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-8827L-10Recalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · LO-PRO LOCK SCRW,SS 2.7X 10MM · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867047037), received between Jun 21, 2018 and May 22, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Mechanics Altered1
  • Migration or Expulsion of Device1

Patient problems

  • Anxiety1
  • Dizziness1
  • Fatigue1
  • Headache1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Code Available1
  • Reaction1
  • Tinnitus1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 22, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON/SCRUB TECH DID NOT REALIZE THEY WERE USING A CANNULATED DRIVER AND CROSS THREADED THE LOCKING SCREW INTO THE PLATE. THE TORQUE ON THE DRIVER BROKE THE DRIVER AND THE SCREW AND THEY WERE UNABLE TO GET THE SCREW OUT OF THE PLATE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 4/9/2021 IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANKLE FRACTURE REPAIR PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON/SCRUB TECH DID NOT REALIZE THEY WERE USING A CANNULATED DRIVER AND CROSS THREADED THE LOCKING SCREW INTO THE PLATE. THE IMPLANT SCREW WAS CROSS THREADED INTO THE PLATE AND THE WHOLE THING PULLED OUT OF THE PATIENT¿S BONE. THE TORQUE ON THE DRIVER BROKE THE DRIVER AND THE SCREW AND THEY WERE UNABLE TO GET THE SCREW OUT OF THE PLATE. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED USING A NEW PLATE, SCREW AND DRIVER.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19376170 ↗
  • InjuryJan 27, 2020Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    IT WAS REPORTED BY THE PATIENT THAT SHE HAD AN ORIGINAL ANKLE PROCEDURE (B)(6) 2017. DURING THE SURGERY SIX ARTHREX PRODUCTS WERE IMPLANTED. THE PATIENT DEVELOPED ALLERGIC LIKE REACTION SYMPTOMS AND RECENTLY HAD TO UNDERGO A SECOND SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019 TO EXPLANT THE ARTHREX DEVICES. PATIENT DID NOT HAVE AN FURTHER DETAILS AT THE TIME OF REPORT BUT WILL PROVIDE SOON. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1/8/2020: ORIGINAL PROCEDURE WAS ON (B)(6) 2017 AND WAS A LEFT ANKLE ORIF. FOLLOWING SURGERY THE PATIENT WAS IN THE HOSPITAL FOR THREE NIGHTS. SHE STARTED HAVING RINGING IN HER EARS AND DIZZINESS 3 MONTHS AFTER SURGERY. THIS WAS FOLLOWED BY TIREDNESS, MIGRAINES, AND TMJ ON HER RIGHT SIDE. SHE ALSO DEVELOPED NOTICEABLY DRIER, FLAKY SKIN AND MORE ANXIETY AFTER ABOUT 6 MONTHS. SHE DEVELOPED FOOD INTOLERANCE TO DAIRY AND DEVELOPED A THYROID NODULE AS WELL. PATIENT HAD A SECOND SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019 TO EXPLANT ALL OF THE ORIGINAL IMPLANT DEVICES. THE SECOND SURGERY WAS PERFORMED BY A DIFFERENT SURGEON AT A DIFFERENT FACILITY. THE FOLLOWING DEVICES WERE REPORTED TO HAVE BEEN IMPLANTED (B)(6) 2017 AND EXPLANTED (B)(6) 2019 (SPECIFIC ARTHREX PART NUMBERS WERE NOT PROVIDED): (B)(4), KNOTLESS TIGHTROPE

    Patient problems: Anxiety; Dizziness; Fatigue; Headache; Reaction; Tinnitus

    MAUDE report 9631383 ↗
  • InjuryJun 21, 2018Migration or Expulsion of Device; Mechanics Altered

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A REVISION LT ANKLE FX PROCEDURE A TOTAL OF QTY. 3 AR-8827L-12 (LOT: 031731, LOT: 10158067, LOT: 185363) AND QTY. 2 AR-8827L-14 (LOT: 031725) WOULD NOT STAY ENGAGED IN THE PLATE. THE BONE WAS PREPPED BY A 2.0MM DRILL. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED 6/12/2018: THE ORIGINAL SURGERY TOOK PLACE ON (B)(6) 2017. THE TYPE OF PROCEDURE BEING PERFORMED WAS A FIBULA FX. THE CASE TOOK PLACE AT (B)(6) HOSPITAL AND THE SURGERY WAS PERFORMED BY DR. (B)(6). THE FOLLOWING ARTHREX PART NUMBERS WERE IMPLANTED DURING THE (B)(6) 2017 PROCEDURE (LOT NUMBERS OF THE DEVICES ARE UNKNOWN). AR-8943BL-05. AR-8835-12 (QTY. 2). AR-8830-14 (QTY. 1). AR-8835-14 (QTY. 1). AR-8827L-14 (QTY. 3). AR-8827L-10 (QTY. 1). THE REVISION SURGERY TOOK PLACE ON (B)(6) 2018 TO FIX A HIGH NON UNION FIBULA FX. IT IS UNKNOWN IF OR WHAT SPECIFIC PART AND LOT NUMBERS WERE EXPLANTED DURING THE (B)(6) 2018 REVISION SURGERY. DURING THE REVISION SURGERY, A 2.7 LOCKING GUIDE WAS PLACED INTO THE LOCKING HOLE. THE BONE WAS DRILLED WITH A 2MM DRILL. A QUANTITY OF 3 AR-8827L-12, LOW PROFILE LOCKING SCREW(S) (LOT: 031731/LOT: 10158067/LOT: 185363) WOULD NOT FULLY ENGAGE INTO THE FIBULA PLATE. THE SURGEON BACKED

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 7625272 ↗

Other Screw, fixation, bone devices

All Screw, fixation, bone devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page