Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-8835L-18Recalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · LO-PRO LOCK SCRW,SS 3.5X 18MM · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
7
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867047563), received between Apr 18, 2019 and Mar 4, 2026 — classified as 7 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 2 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break5
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Loose or Intermittent Connection1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant3
  • Implant Pain2
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Code Available1

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 4, 2026Patient Device Interaction Problem

    ON 21-OCT-2025, A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED VIA EMAIL THAT A CLAVICLE PLATE IMPLANTED IN A PATIENT EXPERIENCED A FAILURE. ACCORDING TO THE REPORT, THE FAILURE OCCURRED APPROXIMATELY SIX MONTHS POST IMPLANTATION, AND NO TRAUMA WAS NOTED DURING THAT PERIOD. RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGES OF THE PLATE FAILURE WERE PROVIDED FOR REVIEW. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 24-OCT-2025: THE ORIGINAL SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2025, INVOLVING AN ORIF OF THE RIGHT CLAVICLE. THERE WERE NO INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS, INCLUDING NO CASE DELAYS, ADDED ANESTHESIA TIME, OR ADVERSE EVENTS. THE SPECIFIC ARTHREX PART NUMBERS USED DURING THE PROCEDURE WERE NOT PROVIDED. THE IMPLANT FAILURE WAS IDENTIFIED SIX MONTHS POSTOPERATIVELY, OCCURRING AT THE JUNCTION BETWEEN THE SCREW HOLES. A REVISION SURGERY HAS BEEN SCHEDULED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE EVENT IS AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 10/30/2025: THE SPECIFIC ARTHREX PART NUMBERS USED DURING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED AT THIS TIME. A REVISION SURGERY IS SCHEDULED TO TAKE PLACE IN TWO WEEKS. THE PATIENT DID NOT REPORT ANY PRIOR SYMPTOMS OR EXPERIENCE A POPPING SENSATION AT THE SITE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24506269 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 8, 2025Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A CLAVICLE FRACTURE SURGERY THE PLATE BROKE IN THE MIDDLE DURING FASTENING. THE BROKEN PARTS WERE RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22750456 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 16, 2024Break; Break

    ON 1/18/2024, AN FDA MEDWATCH NOTIFICATION WAS RECEIVED VIA EMAIL. A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT AN AR-2685DR-10 DISTAL CLAVICLE PLATE BROKE EIGHT WEEKS POST-OPERATIVE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2023 FOR AN OPEN REDUCTION WITH INTERNAL FIXATION OF THE RIGHT COMMINUTED MID-SHIFT CLAVICLE FRACTURE. EIGHT WEEKS LATER, THE PATIENT RETURNED TO THE CLINIC, EXPERIENCING PAINFUL POPS IN THE SHOULDER. ON (B)(6) 2023, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY TO REMOVE THE AR-2685DR-10 DISTAL CLAVICLE PLATE. THE REVISION SURGERY WAS A REVISION OPEN REDUCTION AND INTERNAL FIXATION OF THE RIGHT CLAVICLE FRACTURE WITH ILIAC BONE GRAFT AND RIGHT CLAVICLE HARDWARE REMOVAL. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 1/23/2024: DURING THE ORIGINAL PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2023, AN AR-2685DR-10 DISTAL CLAVICLE PLATE, AN AR-8827L-20 LOW PROFILE LOCKING SCREW, (4) AR-8827L-18 LOW PROFILE LOCKING SCREW, (2) AR-8835-16 LOW PROFILE SCREW, AN AR-8835-18 LOW PROFILE SCREW, (2) AR-8835L-18 LOW PROFILE LOCKING SCREW, AND AN AR-8835L-16 LOW PROFILE LOCKING SCREW WERE IMPLANTED. DURING THE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2023, ALL THE IMPLANTS WERE SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain

    MAUDE report 18725435 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 16, 2024Break; Break

    ON 1/18/2024, AN FDA MEDWATCH NOTIFICATION WAS RECEIVED VIA EMAIL. A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT AN AR-2685DR-10 DISTAL CLAVICLE PLATE BROKE EIGHT WEEKS POST-OPERATIVE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2023 FOR AN OPEN REDUCTION WITH INTERNAL FIXATION OF THE RIGHT COMMINUTED MID-SHIFT CLAVICLE FRACTURE. EIGHT WEEKS LATER, THE PATIENT RETURNED TO THE CLINIC, EXPERIENCING PAINFUL POPS IN THE SHOULDER. ON (B)(6) 2023, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY TO REMOVE THE AR-2685DR-10 DISTAL CLAVICLE PLATE. THE REVISION SURGERY WAS A REVISION OPEN REDUCTION AND INTERNAL FIXATION OF THE RIGHT CLAVICLE FRACTURE WITH ILIAC BONE GRAFT AND RIGHT CLAVICLE HARDWARE REMOVAL. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 1/23/2024: DURING THE ORIGINAL PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2023, AN AR-2685DR-10 DISTAL CLAVICLE PLATE, AN AR-8827L-20 LOW PROFILE LOCKING SCREW, (4) AR-8827L-18 LOW PROFILE LOCKING SCREW, (2) AR-8835-16 LOW PROFILE SCREW, AN AR-8835-18 LOW PROFILE SCREW, (2) AR-8835L-18 LOW PROFILE LOCKING SCREW, AND AN AR-8835L-16 LOW PROFILE LOCKING SCREW WERE IMPLANTED. DURING THE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2023, ALL THE IMPLANTS WERE SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain

    MAUDE report 18724724 ↗
  • InjuryMay 10, 2023Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE FOLLOWING DEVICES WERE IMPLANTED ON THE (B)(6) 2023: AR-2652CL (LOT: 5262102); AR-8835L-16 (LOT: 14975878); AR-8835L-18 (LOT: 14975879), AR-8835-16 (LOT: 14999011) AND AR-8835-18 (LOT: 14983034). THE PLATE BENT POST-OP WITHOUT EXTERNAL INFLUENCE. ON THE (B)(6) 2023 IT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A NEW CLAVICLE FRACTURE PLATE (AR-2652CL). NO FURTHER INFORMATION RECEIVED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 16904842 ↗
  • InjuryMay 10, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE FOLLOWING DEVICES WERE IMPLANTED ON THE (B)(6) 2022: AR-2651CL (LOT: 5262203); AR-8835-16 (ILOT: 14999011); AR-8835L-16 (LOT: 14975878) AND AR-8835L-18 (LOT: 14946776). THE PLATE BROKE POST-OP WITHOUT EXTERNAL INFLUENCE. ON THE (B)(6) 2023 IT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A NEW CLAVICLE FRACTURE PLATE (AR-2652CL). NO FURTHER INFORMATION RECEIVED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 16904810 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 13, 2022Break

    ON 5/24/2022, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL THAT AN AR-2652CR CLAVICLE FRACTURE PLATE WAS IMPLANTED IN PATIENT ON (B)(6) 2022 DURING A CLAVICLE FRACTURE. PATIENT FELT THE PLATE BREAK AND ON 5/23/2022, IT WAS CONFIRM VIA X-RAYS THAT THE PLATE HAD BROKEN. A REVISION SURGERY HAS BEEN SCHEDULE BY THE SAME SURGEON THAT PERFORMED THE ORIGINAL PROCEDURE AND IT WILL TAKE PLACE AT THE SAME FACILITY. THIS REVISION SURGERY HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR 5/24/2022 TO REMOVE ALL THE IMPLANTED SCREWS ALONG WITH THE BROKEN PLATE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 5/26/2022: DURING ORIGINAL PROCEDURE, SURGEON IMPLANTED THE FOLLOWING: ONEAR-2652CR CLAVICLE FRACTURE PLATE, ONE AR-2665-16H FRAGMENT SCREW, ONE AR-2665-18H FRAGMENT SCREW, ONE AR-2665-20H FRAGMENT SCREW, ONE AR-2665-22H FRAGMENT SCREW, ONE AR-8835-16 LOW PROFILE SCREW, ONE AR-8835-18 LOW PROFILE SCREW, TWO AR-8835-20 LOW PROFILE SCREWS, ONE AR-8835L-16 LOW PROFILE LOCKING SCREW, AND THREE AR-8835L-18 LOW PROFILE LOCKING SCREW. ALL THESE IMPLANTS WERE REMOVED DURING REVISION SURGERY ON 5/24/2022. CASE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY USING SYNTHES WITHOUT FURTHER ISSUES.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 14675278 ↗
  • InjuryJul 20, 2021Loose or Intermittent Connection

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT 6-8 WEEKS AFTER THE INITIAL IMPLANTATION THE DEVICE HAS COME LOOSE FROM THE THREAD. A REVISION SURGERY HAD TO BE PERFORMED ON THE (B)(6) 2021. DURING THE REVISION SURGERY THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND THE REVISION SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A LONGER CLAVICULA PLATE.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 12196615 ↗
  • InjuryApr 18, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2017 THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ANKLE FRACTURE PROCEDURE WHERE THE FOLLOWING DEVICES WERE IMPLANTED: AR-8943C-10 / LOT: 1338539 X1, AR-8835-20 / LOT: 10016008 X1, AR-8835L-14 / LOT: 141751 X1, AR-8835L-16 / LOT: 10003529 X3, AR-8835L-18 / LOT: 1382955 X3, AR-8926T / LOT: 17469 X1. PATIENT UNDERWENT A SECOND PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2019 FOR AN UNKNOWN REASON. ALL DEVICES LISTED ABOVE WERE EXPLANTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED 4/24/2019: THE SECOND SURGERY WAS CONFIRMED AND THE DEVICES LISTED WERE EXPLANTED. PATIENT WAS OPERATED AND TITANIUM IMPLANTS WERE PLACED TO REPLACE THE EXPLANTED STEEL IMPLANTS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRODUCTS WERE WITHDRAWN IN THE SECOND SURGERY FOR SAFETY AND TO AVOID METALLOSIS. NO FURTHER EXPLANATION WAS PROVIDED AS TO ANY ADDITIONAL REASON FOR THE SECOND SURGERY.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 8526630 ↗

Other Screw, fixation, bone devices

All Screw, fixation, bone devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page