Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-8933L-18Recalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · LO-PRO LOCK SCRW,TI,3.0MMX 18MM · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867050068), received between Mar 5, 2019 and Oct 27, 2023 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Patient-Device Incompatibility” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Patient-Device Incompatibility2
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant1
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • Necrosis1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Skin Discoloration1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 27, 2023Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE THREAD OF THE SCREW LOOSENED DURING INSERTION INTO THE PLATE. NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY WAS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18022423 ↗
  • InjuryAug 26, 2019Patient-Device Incompatibility

    IT HAS BEEN REPORTED THAT A PATIENT HAD UNDERGONE A PREVIOUS KNEE SURGERY USING ANOTHER MANUFACTURER¿S PRODUCT. APPROXIMATELY ONE WEEK LATER THE PATIENT THEN UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE USING AN ARTHREX PATELLA SUTUREPLATE STAR SMALL, ON (B)(6) 2019 (CASE (B)(4)). AT TIME OF SURGERY THE INTER-OPERATIVE X-RAY LOOKED GOOD. HOWEVER, ONE DAY AFTER THE SURGERY IT WAS NOTICED ON A SECOND X-RAY THAT THE FRACTURE GAP WAS OPEN AND TOO FAR APART. THE PATIENT WAS SCHEDULED FOR A REVISION SURGERY. ON (B)(6) 2019 THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE TO REMOVE THE FOLLOWING IMPLANTS: AR-13059S (LOT 6045180600 - QTY1) PATELLA SUTUREPLATE STAR SMALL (NOT SOLD IN US); AR-8935L-22 (LOT W46320 - QTY 2) LOCKING SCREW; AR-8935L-20 (LOT 10224133 -QTY 3) LOCKING SCREW; AR-8935L-20 (LOT 1009169 - QTY 1) LOCKING SCREW; AR-8935L-18 (LOT 1011926 -QTY 1) LOCKING SCREW; AR-8935L-18 (LOT W584981 -QTY1) LOCKING SCREW. TO COMPLETE THE REVISION PROCEDURE THE SURGEON IMPLANTED AN ARTHREX PATELLA SUTUREPLATE II (SIZE L) WITH CORRESPONDING ARTHREX SCREWS. THE SURGEON TOOK AN X-RAY AND NOTICED THAT THE SIZE L PLATE WAS TOO BIG. SURGEON REMOVED THE PATELLA SUTUREPLATE II (SIZE L) AND SCREWS. SURGEON THEN CHANG

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 8930502 ↗
  • InjuryMar 5, 2019Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED BY THE PATIENT¿S LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A LEFT 1ST METATARSOPHALANGEAL JOINT REVISION FUSION AND HARDWARE REMOVAL, EXTRACTION OF GRAFT AND WEIL OSTEOTOMY ON (B)(6) 2017 DUE TO PAINFUL NONUNION OF HER LEFT FIRST METATARSOPHALANGEAL JOINT FUSION. DURING THE PROCEDURE THE SURGEON EXPLANTED A PLATE AND LAG SCREWS FROM A PREVIOUS PROCEDURE (DATE OF PREVIOUS PROCEDURE AND EXPLANTED DEVICE MANUFACTURER UNKNOWN AT TIME OF INITIAL REPORT). THE SURGEON UTILIZED A 1.7 MM DRILL BIT, AR-1201-7DC, FOR MICRO DRILLING THROUGH THE FUSION SITE IN ORDER TO PROMOTE INGROWTH AND THE DRILL BIT SNAPPED OFF INTRAMEDULLARY. THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE THE DRILL BIT FRAGMENT BUT WAS UNABLE TO BECAUSE OF THE LOCATION. THE OPERATIVE REPORT DATED (B)(6) 2017 NOTED THAT REMOVAL OF THE DRILL BIT FRAGMENT WOULD CAUSE MORE HARM TO THE PATIENT. THE SURGEON FINISHED THE SURGERY BY PERFORMING A CAPSULOTOMY AND WEILL OSTEOTOMY AND IMPLANTED THE FOLLOWING ARTHREX PLATE AND SCREWS: AR-8944CL-L (LOW PROFILE MTP PLATE), AR-8730-38PT (QUICKFIX SCREW), AR-8933-24 (LOW PROFILE SCREW), AR-8933-18 (LOW PROFILE SCREW), AND AR-8933L-18 (QTY 2) (LOW PROFILE LOCKING SCREW). IN (B)(6) 20

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; Necrosis; Skin Discoloration

    MAUDE report 8391614 ↗

Other Screw, fixation, bone devices

All Screw, fixation, bone devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page